← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·Uznesenie·24.9.1963

C-67/63

ECLI:EU:C:1963:22

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61963CO0067

ORDER OF 24.9.63 — CASE 67/63

would have meant, taking the content of outlined by that Decision. Nor has the that Decision alone, that the High applicant alleged that this time-limit

Authority intended to await the adop­ was too short, for example, as far as tion of new trading rules for the Ruhr. concerns the requirements for making

When it was apparent that these new preparations to leave. rules, precisely because they accorded

with the previously existing transitional 3. All the arguments submitted do not

rules, could no more justify a transition­ therefore warrant the annulment of

al period in favour of SOREMA's Decision No 8/63, whilst those which

membership (as stated in the preamble one might have expected to hear based

to Decision No 3/62), the High Author­ on the meaning of the transitional rules ity ordered SOREMA to leave the OKU made for SOREMA's benefit, for ex­

within a relatively short time. So far as ample that the transitional period did concerns the calculation of the period not give enough time to fulfil the

of validity of Decision No 3/62, this ordinary conditions for admission, have accords with the programme not been raised at all. exactly

III—Consequently, my opinion is that the application by SOREMA is

admissible but that it should be dismissed as unfounded, with the conse­

in in Article 69 the Rules Pro­ quences the matter of costs as stated of of

cedure.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT 1 24 SEPTEMBER 1963

In Case 67/63 R

SOCIÉTÉ RHÉNANE D'EXPLOITATION ET DE MANUTENTION 'SOREMA', a

limited liability company having its registered office in Strasbourg at 11 rue

Fischart, represented by its managers, and by R. Garnon of the Strasbourg Bar, 8 rue du Marché, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Nicholas Wennmacher, huissier, 17 boulevard Royal,

applicant,

v

HIGH Authority of the European Coal and Steel COMMUNITY , rep­

resented by its Legal Advisers, Messrs Matthies and Olivier, with an address for service in Luxembourg at its registered office, 2 place de Metz,

defendant,

Application for suspension of operation of Decision No 8/63 of 30 April 1963

of the High Authority, contested in the application in the main action,

1 — Language of the Case: French.

SOREMA v HIGH AUTHORITY

Issues of fact and of law

Whereas the applicant, by application plicant on 4 May 1963 and published at the Court Registry on 4 June 1963, in the Official Journal of 11 May made an application for annulment of 1963 be suspended, pending the

Decision No 8/63 of 30 April 1963 of the ruling of the Court on application

High Authority of the European Coal No 67/63; and Steel Community, concerning mem­ — Reserve the costs until the main

bership of the Oberrheinische Kohlen- action; union, Bettag, Puton & Co., Mannheim, Whereas the defendant on 21 August

on the part of the Société Rhénane lodged its observations on the request

d'Exploitation et de Manutention, for the adoption of the interim measure,

Strasbourg; contending that the request for suspen­

'SOREMA'

Whereas in the application for suspen­ sion made by the company sion lodged at the Court Registry on should be dismissed with all legal 9 August 1963, the applicant claimed consequences, in particular as regards

that the Court should: cost ; — Order that the operation of Decision Whereas the parties having been duly No 8/63 of 3 April 1963 of the High summoned on 24 September 1963 before

Authority of the European Coal and the President and submitted their oral

Steel Community notified to the ap- observations;

Grounds

It appears from the record that the associates of the Oberrheinische Kohlen-

union, Bettag, Puton & Co., passed the following resolution in writing:

'Die SOREMA scheidet gemäß Entscheidung der Hohen Behörde Nr 8/63 vom 30 April 1963 zum 30 Juni 1963 aus der Oberrheinischen Kohlenunion

Bettag, Puton & Co., aus.

Der Kapitalanteil der SOREMA in Hohe DM (ein­ von 900.000, —

gezahlt die Hälfte) wird von den iibrigen Gesellschaften im Verhältnis ihrer Großhändleranteile übernommen. Ein Großhändleranteil des Kapitalan­

teils der SOREMA (110 Anteile) beträgt DM 8.181,82 (davon ist die Hälfte DM 4.090,91 je Anteil einzuzahlen);'

=

'(In accordance with Decision No 8/63 of 30 April 1963, SOREMA shall

leave the Oberrheinische Kohlenunion on 30 June 1963;

SOREMA's share of capital amounting to DM 900000 (one half paid up) be taken over by the remaining companies in proportion to their shares shall

as wholesale merchants. One wholesale merchant's share of SOREMA's half= share of capital (110 shares) amounts to DM 8181.82 (whereof one DM 4090.91 is payable per share);'

ORDER OF 24.9.63 — CASE 67/63

This resolution constitutes implementation of Decision No 8/63 of 30 April 1963 of the High Authority.

The applicant, who had received notice of the intention to pass the above quoted resolution by letter of 10 July 1963 from the OKU did not lodge its application for suspension at the Court Registry until 9 August 1963.

The request is therefore out of time.

The request for suspension having failed ab initio in its purpose, it must be declared inadmissible.

On those grounds,

Having regard to Articles 33 and 39 of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and Article 33 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Com unity;

Having regard to Articles 83, 84 and 86 of the Rules of Procedure,

The President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities

hereby orders:

1. The application is inadmis ble;

2. The costs are reserved.

Luxembourg 24 September 1963.

A. Van Houtte A. M. Donner Registrar President

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Uznesenie C-67/63 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik