C-25/65
ECLI:EU:C:1967:13
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61965CO0025
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
ORDER OF THECOURT (SECONDCHAMBER) 26 MAY1967 1
Società Industriale Metallurgica di Napoli (Simet) v HighAuthorityof the European Goal and Steel Community 2
Case 25/65
In Case 25/65
SOCIETÀ INDUSTRIALEMETALLURGICAdi Napoli ( SIMET)
v
High Authorityof the European Coal andSteel Community,
Having regard to thejudgment deliveredbythe Court on 2 March 1967 in Joined Cases 25and 26/65 (Società IndustrialeMetallurgica di Napoli, Simet,and Aciaierie Ferriere diRoma, Feram, v High Authority) 2;
Whereasby theaforesaid judgment, theHigh Authority of the European Coal and SteelCommunity wasordered to paythe costsof Case25/65;
Whereasin replyto thestatement of fees and expenses sent on 27 March 1967 byArturo Cottrau, counsel for theSimet company,to the High Auth ority, the Agent of the latter, Italo Telchini, byletter dated 6 April 1967, informed Mr Cottrau 'that in pursuanceof apractice hithertoadopted in similarcases, the HighAuthority waits until the Court haspronounced upon thesettlementof fees before consideringthequestion of paying them' and that itwas thereforeappropriate that he should make an application to the Court inthis matter,'in conformitywith Article 74 of the Rules of Procedure';
Whereas MrCottrau, on 14 April 1967, madeanapplication to the Court for anorder fromwhich no appeal shall lie regardingpayment of the costswhich hestates he has advanced;
Whereas, inits observations lodged on25 April1967, the High Authority stated,asregards the amountof thecosts, that it was content to leave the matterfor the decisionof theCourt, butthatit was opposedto the liquidated fees and expenses being paid to MrCottrau personally;
1 —Language ofthe Case: Italian. 2 — [1967]E.C.R.
ORDER OF 26. 5.1967— CASE 25/65
Whereas, under Article74 (1)of the Rules of Procedure, the Chamber to which thecase has beenassigned shallmake an order concerning the costs to berecovered only'ifthere isa dispute';
Whereas, inthis case,at the dateon which the applicant applied to the Court for anorder, thereexisted between the parties no dispute regarding either the amount of the costs to be recovered or their payment;
Whereas, therefore,as theconditions laid down inArticle 74 (1) of the Rules of Procedureare not fulfilled, theapplication mustbe dismissed as inadmiss ible;
On those grounds,
Upon hearing the reportof theJudge-Rapporteur; Upon hearingthe opinionof the Advocate-General;
THE COURT (SecondChamber)
composed of:R. Monaco,President, Ch. L.Hammes (Rapporteur) and A. M. Donner, Judges,
Advocate-General: J. Gand Registrar: A. VanHoutte
hereby orders :
The application madeby the applicant inthe main actionfor an. order concerning the costs to berecovered is dismissed.
Luxembourg 26 May 1967
A.Van Houtte R. Monaco
Registrar President of theSecond Chamber