← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·Rozsudok·22.9.1976

C-10/76

ECLI:EU:C:1976:125

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61976CJ0010

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 SEPTEMBER 1976 1

Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

'Public works contracts'

Case 10/76

Summary

Directives — Mandatory nature — Time-limits — Compliance therewith (EEC Treaty, Article 189)

The mandatory nature of directives contained therein in order that their entails the obligation for all Member implementation shall be achieved States to comply with the time-limits uniformly within the whole Community.

In Case 10/76

Commission of the European Communities, represented by its Legal Adviser, Antonino Abate, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Mario Cervino, Legal Adviser of the Commission, Bâtiment CFL, place de la Gare,

applicant, v

Italian Republic, represented by its Ambassador Adolfo Maresca, acting as Agent, assisted by Ivo Maria Braguglia, Viceavvocato dello Stato, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Italian Embassy,

defendant,

Application for a declaration that the Government of the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive No 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 682,

1 — Language of the Case: Italian.

JUDGMENT OF 22. 9. 1976 — CASE 10/76

THE COURT

composed of: R. Lecourt, President, H. Kutscher and A. O'Keeffe, Presidents of Chambers, A. M. Donner, J. Mertens de Wilmars, P. Pescatore, M. Sørensen, A. J. Mackenzie Stuart and F. Capotorti, Judges,

Advocate-General: G. Reischl

Registrar: A. Van Houtte

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Facts

The facts and the arguments put forward — Advertising of notices of contracts on by the parties in the course of the written the Community level by publication procedure may be summarized as in the Official Journal of the follows: European Communities (Article 12); — Introduction of objective criteria for the selection of undertakings and the I — Facts and procedure award of contracts by national administrations (Article 23 et seq.); 1. On 26 July 1971 the Council of the — Introduction of a procedure designed European Communities adopted two to ensure that these principles are Directives for attaining freedom of observed, particularly through the establishment and freedom to provide intervention of the Advisory services in the matter of public works Committee set up by Council contracts. The first, No 71/304/EEC (OJ, Decision No 71/306/EEC of 26 July English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 678), 1971 (OJ, English Special Edition implements, with regard to public works 1971 (II), p. 693). contracts, the principle of the prohibition of discrimination based on nationality in The directive was devised to bring into the matter of freedom to provide services. line the law of the Member States on this The second, No 71/305/EEC (OJ, matter and required the Member States English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 682), to adopt the measures necessary to provides for the coordination of national comply with it within twelve months of procedures for the award of public works its notification; this period expired on 29 contracts based on the following basic July 1972. principles: — Prohibition of national technical 2. By a Law of 2 February 1973, the specifications having a discrimi­ Italian legislature prescribed the 'Rules natory effect (Articles 10 and 11); relating to the procedures for the award

COMMISSION v ITALY

of public contracts by restricted The written procedure followed the invitation to tender' (Norme sui normal course. Upon hearing the report procedimenti di gara negli appalte di of the Judge-Rapporteur and the views of opere pubbliche mediante licitazione the Advocate-General, the Court decided privata, Gazzetta Ufficiale of 24 February to open the oral procedure without any 1973, No 51). The Commission took the preparatory inquiry. view that this Law did not fulfil the objectives of Directive No 71/305/EEC and by a letter of 10 June 1974, pursuant II — Conclusions of the parties to Article 169 of the EEC Treaty, invited the Italian Government to submit its The Commission claims that the Court observations within 30 days of receipt of should: the said letter. (a) declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under By a letter of 5 July 1974 from its Council Directive No 71/305/EEC of Permanent Representation, the Italian 26 July 1971, concerning the Government conveyed to the coordination of procedures for the Commission a draft bill intended to award of public works contracts; implement the Community rules 'fully', (b) order the Italian Republic to pay the which, according to the Commission, costs.

satisfied to a large extent the conditions laid down by the directive in question. In its defence, the Italian Government As this bill had not yet been passed in sets out its point of view, but does not March 1975, the Commission, by a however submit any conclusion on the reasoned opinion of 1 April 1975, invited issues of the action. the Italian Republic to adopt the necessary measures within a month. Ill — Submissions and argu­ By a letter of 29 April 1975 from the ments of the parties Permanent Representation, the Italian Government conveyed to the In the submission of the Commission, Commission the bill presented to the first of all the Italian Republic failed to Chamber of Deputies on 1 August 1974, fulfil its obligation to enact before 29 entitled: 'Rules of adapting procedures July 1972 the measures necessary to give for the award of public works contracts to effect to the directive and, furthermore, the directives of the European Law No 14 of 2 February 1973 only Community' (Norme di adequamento fulfilled its obligations under that delle procedure di aggiudicazione degli directive very incompletely. appalti di lavori pubblici alle direttive della Comunità Europea) a text Indeed:

corresponding to the draft bill sent to the (a; whereas the directive applies to all Commission on 5 July 1974. At the procedures for the award of contracts, same time an assurance was given that both 'open' and 'restricted' (Article 5), the Office of the President of the the Italian Law applies only to the Council of Ministers, the Ministry of procedure for award by restricted Construction and the Ministry for invitation to tender, termed Foreign Affairs would make every effort 'licitazione privata'; to set in motion the procedure for the (b) Article 29 (3) of Directive No passing of the bill by Parliament. 71/305/EEC provides for the progressive abolition of the Italian The application dated 30 January 1976 'anonymous envelope' procedure, but was lodged at the Court Registry on 5 the Italian Law makes no mention of February 1976. this subject;

JUDGMENT OF 22. 9. 1976 -CASE 10/76

(c) The second paragraph of Article 12 of The Italian authorities moreover the directive provides for the implicitly accepted the findings of the publication of notices of contracts in Commission and realized the need to the Official Journal of the Euro adjust the Italian legal system to the pean Communities: the Italian Law Community provisions, as is shown by limits itself (Article 7) to providing the existence of the bill submitted to the for the publication of notices in the Chamber of Deputies on 13 August 1974 Official Journal of the Italian and not yet passed.

Republic; (d) In Articles 16 (d) and 17 (a) the As appears from the judgment of the directive lays down the obligation to Court of Justice of 21 June 1973 (Case indicate the time-limit for the 79/72, Commission v Italian Republic completion of the works. The Italian [1973] ECR 667 at p. 672) the failure to Law makes no provision in this observe the time-limit laid down first by connexion; the Directive (29 July 1972) and (e) The criteria for qualitative selection, subsequently by the reasoned opinion (1 specified as essential in Articles 20, May 1975) constitutes a serious failure by 24, 25 and 26 of the directive

a Member State to fulfil its obligations. (vocational aptitude, financial and economic standing and technical knowledge or ability), which must be In its defence the Italian Government observed by the authority awarding points out that the bill presented to the contracts, are not mentioned in the Chamber of Deputies on 13 August 1974 Italian Law, which thus maintains the is designed to amend existing law to the wide discretionary powers conferred extent necessary to put the directive into effect. on authorities awarding contracts by

the previous provisions; (f) Under the last paragraph of Article It was for reasons of legal certainty that 15 of the directive, requests for the provisions of the directive were participation and invitations to tender reiterated in a Law, a procedure which may be made by telegram, telex offers greater guarantees but takes longer. message or telephone. As the Italian The Italian Government hopes that the Law makes no mention of this bill will be passed as soon as possible, so subject, the Commission is of the that the subject-matter of the action may opinion that the prohibition on be considered as having ceased to exist. tendering by telegram is still in force in Italy; In its reply the Commission points out (g) The time-limit fixed by authorities that the defendant does not challenge the for receipt of requests to participate validity of the submissions and must not, according to the direc

conclusions formulated in the tive (first paragraph of Article 14) be application. It stresses, as has already less than twenty-one days from the been done in the reasoned opinion of 1 date of sending the notice of April 1975, that Bill No 3219 submitted contract; the Italian Law limits itself to the Chamber of Deputies on 13 to providing a minimum time-limit August 1974 would in large measure of 10 days from the publication of satisfy, both as to substance and as to the notice; form, the conditions set by Council (h) The Italian Law does not lay down Directive No 71/305.

The Commission any obligation formulated in Article acknowledges that the nature of the 29 (5) of Directive No 71/305/EEC to Italian legal system is such that it is justify to the Advisory Committee the impossible to carry out the necessary rejection of tenders considered to be amendments and adjustments in national too low. law by any instrument other than a Law:

COMMISSION v ITALY

no possibility exists of adopting lesser If it is true, as the Italian Government measures, such as administrative states in its defence, that other Member measures. States have not considered it appropriate to give effect to the directive by way of It observes however that the choice of legislation, it should however be observed form and methods for giving effect to that, on the practical level and as to its Community directives left to national substance, the directive is nevertheless authorities by Article 189 of the EEC applied in those Member States. Treaty is subject to limitations. One limitation of an external kind is Whilst joining with the Italian constituted by the subject-matter of the Government in hoping for the directive If for example the directive is immediate passing of Bill No 3219 by aimed at circumscribing the extent of the both Houses, the Commission feels that discretionary power of public authorities, it must emphasize the seriousness of the the national measures for giving effect to infringement committed by the Italian it inevitably have the nature of legislative Republic. Directive No 71/305 acts, that is to say, acts which are introduces machinery appropriate to mandatory and binding on the stimulate effective competition between administration and capable of creating undertakings in the Community, by rights for individuals which are coordinating procedures for the award of enforceable in a court of law. One public contracts. Failure to put it into limitation which might be described as effect hinders and delays the process of 'internal' is constituted by the state of interpenetration in the sphere of public national substantive law governing the works contracts. subject-matter of the directive. The choice of the methods used to adjust the The Italian Government did not lodge a internal legal system will be conditioned rejoinder. by the form of the instruments already in existence; the choice will have to obey In the oral procedure, on 6 July 1976, the principle of the hierarchy of the the parties enlarged upon the arguments sources of law in force in each national put forward in the written procedure. At legal system. the request of the Court, the Commission produced a list of the It follows from these considerations that measures taken in the Member States to an instrument having force of law give effect to Directive No 71/305/EEC. appears to constitute the only method capable of allowing proper application of The Advocate-General delivered his Directive No 71/305. opinion at the hearing on 13 July 1976.

Law

1 By an application which was received at the Registry on 5 February 1976 the Commission has brought before the Court under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty an action seeking a declaration that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive No 71/305/EEC of the Council of 26 July 1971 (OJ, English Special Edition, 1971 (II), p. 682).

JUDGMENT OF 22. 9. 1976 -CASE 10/76

2 In conjunction with Directive No 71/304/EEC of the same date concerning the abolition of restrictions on freedom to provide services in respect of public works contracts, Directive No 71/305/EEC seeks to coordinate the national procedures for the award of these contracts. Under Article 32 Member States were to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the directive within twelve months of its notification to them, which period expired on 29 July 1972.

3 Subsequent to this directive the Italian Republic adopted the Law of 2 February 1973 relating to the procedures for the award of public contracts by restricted invitation to tender (licitazione privata) the text of which was conveyed to the Commission on 16 August 1973.

In application of Article 169 of the EEC Treaty the Commission, however, informed the Italian Republic by letter of 10 June 1974 that it considered that the obligations arising from the abovementioned directive had not been satisfied by the adoption of the Law.

4 In the first place it was claimed that the defendant had excluded from the scope of the Law procedures for the award of public works contracts other than by restricted invitation to tender.

5 Secondly, it was alleged that the defendant had not complied with Article 29 of the directive whereby the Italian 'anonymous envelope' procedure had to be abolished by 29 July 1975 or 29 July 1979 according to the estimated value of the contract as the Italian Law of 2 February 1973 made no provision in this respect.

6 In addition, under Article 12 of the directive, authorities awarding contracts who wish to award a public works contract by open or restricted procedure must make their intention known by means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the Communities whereas the Italian Law limits itself to providing for the publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the Italian Republic.

7 The Italian Law does not contain the provisions referred to in Articles 14, 15, 16 and 17 of the directive concerning the time-limit for the receipt of requests to participate, the form required for tenders and the compulsory indication of the time-limit for the completion of the works put out to tender.

COMMISSION v ITALY

8 Finally, Articles 20, 24, 25 and 26 of the directive lay down the criteria for qualitative selection which allow certain undertakings to be excluded from participation in the contracts, while the Italian Law contains no provision to this effect and retains the wide discretion conferred on authorities awarding contracts by Article 89 of the Royal Decree of 23 May 1924.

9 The defendant did not contest the alleged failures and, on 5 July 1974, conveyed to the Commission a preliminary draft of a bill 'containing the Community rules in full.'

10 The draft, which according to the Commission satisfies the essential requirements of the directive, was conveyed to the Italian Parliament on 13 August 1974 but has still not been adopted with the result that the measures intended to ensure the implementation of the directive are not yet in force at the date of this judgment.

11 Article 189 of the Treaty provides that a directive shall be binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to which it is addressed but leaves to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.

12 The mandatory nature of directives entails the obligation for all Member States to comply with the time-limits contained therein in order that the implementation shall be achieved uniformly within the whole Community.

13 It follows that as the Italian Republic has failed to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive No 71/305/EEC of the Council concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, it has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaty.

Costs

14 Under Article 69 (2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs.

The defendant has failed in its submissions.

It must therefore be ordered to pay the costs.

OPINION OF MR REISCHL -CASE 10/76

On those grounds,

THE COURT

hereby rules:

1. As the Italian Republic has failed to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive No 71/305/EEC of the Council concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, it has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaty.

2. The defendant shall pay the costs.

Lecourt Kutscher O'Keeffe Donner Mertens de Wilmars

Pescatore Sørensen Mackenzie Stuart Capotorti

Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 22 September 1976.

A. Van Houtte R. Lecourt

Registrar President

OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE-GENERAL REISCHL

DELIVERED ON 13 JULY 1976 1

Mr President, mention on the one hand Council Members of the Court, Directive No 71/304 of 26 July 1971 (OJ, English Special Edition, 1971 (II), p. Several Community measures were 678), which relates to the abolition of adopted in 1971 to further the restrictions on freedom to provide implementation of the important services in respect of public works principle of the right of establishment contracts. Next Council Directive No and of freedom to provide services in 71/305 of 26 July 1971 (OJ, English respect of public works contracts. I may Special Edition, 1971 (II), p. 682), issued

1 — Translated from the German.

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Rozsudok C-10/76 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik