C-63/77
ECLI:EU:C:1977:214
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61977CJ0063
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (FIRST CHAMBER) OF 15 DECEMBER 1977 1
Firma Ludwig Poppe v Oberfinanzdirektion, Cologne (preliminary ruling requested by the Bundesfinanzhof)
Case 63/77
Common Customs Tariff — Description of goods — Tariff heading 48.15 — Interpretation
Tariff heading 48.15 of the Common carbon paper and the other flimsy paper, Customs Tariff must be interpreted as as such goods must be classified under meaning that it does not include goods tariff heading 48.18 as 'other stationery of consisting of two sheets of DIN A 4 paper'. format stuck together, one of which is
In Case 63/77
Reference to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that court between
FIRMA LUDWIG POPPE, Wedel (Hamburg),
and
Oberfinanzdirektion (Regional Finance Office), Koln,
on the interpretation of the Common Customs Tariff for the purpose of classifying sheets of paper joined together in sets,
THE COURT
composed of: G. Bosco, President of Chamber, J. Mertens de Wilmars and A. O'Keeffe, Judges,
Advocate-General: J.-P. Warner Registrar: A. Van Houtte
gives the following
I — Language of the Case: German.
JUDGMENT OF 15. 12. 1977 - CASE 63/77
JUDGMENT
Facts and issues
The facts, the procedure and the written The Oberfinanzdirektion dismissed the observations submitted under Article 20 objection by a decision of 28 August of the protocol on the Statute of the 1975 pointing out that having regard to Court of Justice of the EEC may be their dimensions the goods could not be summarized as follows: classified under Part I of Chapter 48 which covers large size papers (rolls or sheets). As regards classification in Part II I — Facts and procedure of the same chapter they could not fall within tariff heading 48.13, which 1. On 3 January 1975 Firma Ludwig comprises carbon paper cut to size as Poppe applied to the Oberfinanz copying paper but not carbon paper direktion, Cologne, for a binding stuck to a sheet of ordinary paper falling customs tariff notification relating to within tariff heading 48.15. Furthermore 'single copy' copying paper known as classification of the goods under heading 'Huron Copysette'. 48.15 was ruled out because they were no longer ordinary paper within the The goods, which are designed for meaning of that tariff heading, since they producing typed copies, consist of a set consisted of a set of one sheet of writing of two sheets of paper of DIN A 4 format paper and one sheet of carbon paper. — one sheet of flimsy paper and one sheet of 'single copy' carbon paper, stuck Poppe, on the other hand, submitted that together at three points underneath. After classification of the goods under tariff the copy has been made the 'single copy' heading 48.13 was justified because carbon paper is detached and thrown they were only used with the addition of away. an original letter and thus were employed for the same purpose as the In its binding customs tariff notification goods mentioned in that heading, the Oberfinanzdirektion classified the namely the production of copies goods as 'other stationery of paper' under (duplication). On the other hand tariff heading 48.18 of the Common classification of the goods under Customs Tariff. The rate of duty subheading 48.15 B might be considered applicable to such goods is 21 % because of their form and of the material (autonomous) or 15 % (conventional). used. Moreover they claimed that if goods were not expressly mentioned in a On 10 March 1975 the Firma Poppe tariff heading they must be classified lodged an objection against that under the tariff heading of which they notification, claiming that the goods have at least two of the distinguishing should be classified under tariff heading features; in this case tariff heading 48.13 48.13 as 'other copying papers ... cut to or subheading 48.15 B. They could not, size, whether or not put up in boxes ...', on the other hand, be classified under or at least under subheading 48.15 B, as tariff heading 48.18 since the 'Other paper ... cut to size or shape'. distinguishing feature of goods referred The rate of duty applicable to such goods to in that heading was their binding (by is 19 % (autonomous) or 12 % (con the use of paper and paperboard which ventional). were lacking in this case).
POPPE v OBERFINANZDIREKTION COLOGNE
2. The issue was taken to the accordance with Article 20 of the Bundesfinanzhof which by an order of Protocol on the Statute of the Court of 5 April 1977 entered at the Court Justice of the EEC. Registry on 17 May 1977 decided to stay proceedings and to refer to the Court of Having heard the report of the Justice for a preliminary ruling the Judge-Rapporteur and the views of the following question: Advocate-General, the Court decided to assign the case to the First Chamber in 'Is tariff heading 48.15 of the Common accordance with Article 95 of the Rules Customs Tariff to be interpreted as of Procedure and to open the oral including only paper of a single kind procedure without any preparatory such as the adhesive strips referred to in inquiry. tariff subheading 48.15 A, and not sets consisting of sheets of different kinds of paper stuck together, each of which is II — Written observations sub
expressly named in or falls under a mitted pursuant to Article different tariff heading, such as carbon 20 of the Protocol on the paper of tariff heading 48.13 and flimsy Statute of the Court of paper cut to size or shape of tariff Justice of the EEC subheading 48.15 B, or do such sets automatically fall under tariff heading (a) Firma Ludwig Poppe takes the view 48.18 as other stationery of paper?' that, since the goods at issue allow copying to be effected by the transfer of The Bundesfinanzhof in the grounds of the carbon coating of the carbon paper to its order states: the other sheet of paper, they must be — The tariff headings to be taken into classified under tariff heading 48.13. In account for the classification of the so far as the sheets of paper which are sets at issue are tariff headings 48.13, used for such purposes comply with the 48.15 and 48.18; requirements as to size they are in fact Carbon paper cut to size is included comprehensively in that tariff mentioned in tariff heading 48.13 heading. whereas flimsy writing paper, as paper cut to size falls within tariff Furthermore the goods are 'put up in heading 48.15; boxes' in a manner which corresponds to — Although the sets consisting of the the type of packaging mentioned in tariff two aforesaid types of paper may also heading 48.13. Moreover, it is in this be classified as 'Other' paper under tariff heading that the imported goods subheading 48.15 B, it is equally true are in fact classified in Switzerland, Spain that, since the carbon paper in this and France.
case has been stuck to the flimsy paper which falls within tariff Should it appear to be impossible to heading 48.15, it has undergone a classify the imported goods under tariff different method of preparation heading 48.13, they should at least be which could justify its classification classified under tariff heading 48.15. The under tariff heading 48.18 as 'other goods in question are in fact cut for stationery of paper'. the purpose of making copies; the requirements as to size are complied with 3. Firma Ludwig Poppe, represented by where the size is 21 × 29.7 cm. Debroschke and Partners and Mr Müller-Kern and the Commission of the On the other hand they do not satisfy European Communities represented by the requirements of tariff heading 48.18. its Legal Adviser, Manfred Beschel, The main feature of the goods covered submitted written observations in by that heading, namely a significant
JUDGMENT OF 15. 12. 1977 - CASE 63/77
transformation, is missing, since they are whereas tariff heading 48.18 comprises neither bound nor printed. Furthermore stationery of paper which in addition to this case is not concerned with a set of being cut has undergone processing for a forms ready for use on an office machine, specific use. which according to the 'Classification slips' of the Nomenclature Committee As for tariff heading 48.13 it is clear from of 18 May and 9 June 1972 is a its wording that the main feature of the determinative criterion in such a case. In goods which it covers is that they are a fact 'Huron Copysette' paper does not of 'means' of copying manufactured from a itself enable a copy to be made. given substance (paper) and presented in
a particular form. The technique of (b) The Commission points out that the copying is of little importance. technical progress made in the manufacture of industrial products means In the case of the goods at issue the the appearance on the market of goods copying paper is only a part thereof, the with new features. The paper at issue is other part consisting of writing paper such an example: it is made up of two (copying paper). Only the sheet of carbon kinds of paper, manufactured separately paper in the set fulfils the conditions of (carbon paper and flimsy paper for tariff heading 48.13; the other sheet is no copying) and stuck together in such a longer a means of copying but a sheet of way that the copying is made easier by paper designed to record the result of the eliminating the risk that the sheets might copying. However, classification of the slip. goods under tariff heading 48.13 presupposes that 'taken as a whole' they The reason why it is difficult to interpret fulfil the conditions referred to in that and apply the Common Customs Tariff tariff heading. Since the set in question is that the proper place for such new includes both the means and the result goods has to be found within the ambit of the copying, classification under tariff of the static provisions of the tariff. For heading 48.13 is consequently ruled out. such purposes it is advisable to rely in For the same reason a classification for the first place on the wording, the structure and the objectives of the tariff. tariff purposes under subheading 48.15 B Where necessary reference must be made is out of the question.
Sheets of copying to the Explanatory Notes to the paper covered by that subheading are in Common Customs Tariff, the fact paper which has not undergone any Explanatory Notes to the Brussels process other than cutting. Since the Nomenclature and to the Classification flimsy paper is attached to a sheet of slips of the Nomenclature Committee as carbon paper, it is no longer paper which auxiliary means of interpretation. has merely been cut with the result that the set of two sheets, that is to say the The Commission remarks that the goods at issue, cannot be classified under question referred to the Court turns on subheading 48.15 B. Furthermore this the delimitation of the three tariff subheading covers only 'Other paper', headings, 48.13, 48.15 B and 48.18 and that is to say paper which has not already unlike tariff heading 48.13 which covers been mentioned in any other tariff specific goods, the features whereof are heading, whereas the sheet of 'carbon accurately described, subheading 48.15 B paper' which is part of the set in and tariff heading 48.18 are 'residual' question is, at all events in its own right, tariff headings intended for those goods already referred to in tariff heading 48.13. of a kind not specifically mentioned
elsewhere. Subheading 48.15 B is On the other hand the fact that the
distinguished in turn from tariff heading goods in question have features found in 48.18 in that it only includes paper two tariff headings does not justify their whose sole feature is that it has been cut, classification under one or other of those
POPPE v OBERFINANZDIREKTION COLOGNE
headings having regard to Note 3 to mentioned in (a) above of certain articles Chapter 48 which states that: 'Paper or expressly referred to in the expression paperboard answering to a description in 'other stationery of paper' is included. two or more of the headings Nos 48.01 The Explanatory Notes to the Brussels to 48.07 is to be classified under that one Nomenclature also give the expression of such headings which occurs latest in 'other stationery of paper' a very wide the Tariff. meaning. Furthermore tariff heading
48.18 also mentions articles in the In the first place it is impossible to apply making up of which there has been no that Note directly since only tariff binding (for example blotting-pads). headings 48.01 to 48.07 are expressly mentioned in it. In the second place an These conclusions concerning the scope application by analogy is also out of the of this tariff heading are not invalidated question, since the tariff, by subdividing by the 'Classification slips' of the Chapter 48 into two sub-Chapters, makes Nomenclature Committee of 18 May and a clear and systematic distinction defined 9 June 1972. The scope of this means of
in Note 4. That distinction would be interpretation is limited to the specific disregarded if Notes, the application case to be determined and in no way whereof is expressly limited to goods in prejudges other cases which are different. sub-Chapter I, could be used by way of interpretation for the classification of In the first slip the reason given for the classification, of the article concerned goods falling within sub-Chapter II. Furthermore an application by analogy of under tariff heading 48.18 was that two Note 3 could only be considered if the kinds of different paper were used at the goods in question were not completely same time to make a new article ready covered by tariff heading 48.18 which is for use. In the second slip concerning in fact the position in this case. 'continuous sets of forms' composed of strips of paper superimposed, bound The latter tariff heading in fact covers together by embossing, ordinary stapling two kinds of goods, namely: or sticking, the article was also classified (a) on the one hand certain articles under tariff heading 48.18 the binding which according to the Explanatory not being a factor in this respect. Notes to the Brussels Nomenclature On the basis of these observations the have the common feature of being 'bound books (including loose-leaf) or Commission proposes that the question referred to the Court be answered as
blocks', and follows: (b) on the other hand all the 'other stationery of paper' which is not 'Sets consisting of two sheets of paper of specifically described in any other DIN A 4 format simply stuck together, tariff heading and has not been one of them being carbon paper and the produced by merely cutting the other flimsy paper must be classified paper. under tariff heading 48.18 as other It follows from this that all paper which stationery of paper'. has been cut and undergone a process of working not covered by a specific tariff Ill — Oral procedure heading must be classified under that tariff heading.
The type of working and The Commission of the European the kind of paper play little part for this Communities submitted oral observations purpose and this is in conformity with at the hearing on 20 October 1977. the residual function of that heading. This function cannot be adequately The Advocate-General delivered his performed if, by means of a somewhat opinion at the hearing on 1 December strained interpretation, the feature 1977.
JUDGMENT OF 15. 12. 1977 - CASE 63/77
Decision
1 By order of 5 April 1977 which reached the Court on 17 May 1977 the Bundesfinanzhof, pursuant to Article 177 of the EEC Treaty, referred the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
'Is tariff heading 48.15 of the Common Customs Tariff to be interpreted as including only paper of a single kind such as the adhesive strips referred to in tariff subheading 48.15 A, and not sets consisting of sheets of different kinds of paper stuck together, each of which is expressly named in or falls under a different tariff heading, such as carbon paper of tariff heading 48.13 and flimsy paper cut to size or shape of tariff subheading 48.15 B, or do such sets automatically fall under tariff heading 48.18 as other stationery of paper?'
2 This question has been referred to the Court in connexion with a dispute relating to the tariff classification of goods known as 'Huron Copysette' designed to make typed copies and consisting of a set of one sheet of flimsy paper and one sheet of carbon paper, each of DIN A 4 format, the carbon paper being detached and thrown away after the copy has been made.
The competent customs authorities in their opinion on the tariff classification of these goods assigned them to subheading 48.18 of the Common Customs Tariff as 'other stationery of paper'.
The undertaking concerned on the other hand maintains that the goods should be classified under tariff heading 48.13 as 'Carbon and other copying papers ... cut to size, whether or not put up in boxes' or at least under heading 48.15 as 'Other paper and paperboard, cut to size or shape', paragraph B.
3 Copying paper is specifically referred to in tariff heading 48.13 of the Common Customs Tariff.
It is clear from the wording of that tariff heading and from the Explanatory Notes to the Brussels Nomenclature relating thereto that it includes only 'paper coated or sometimes impregnated in such a way that one or more copies of an original document can be made by applying pressure ...'.
Since the goods at issue consist of a set of two sheets of paper, only one of which is a means of copying, whereas the other is intended to record
POPPE v OBERFINANZDIREKTION COLOGNE
the results of such copying, they cannot be classified under tariff heading 48.13.
4 Since tariff heading 48.15, on the other hand, refers to 'Other paper and paperboard, cut to size or shape', it applies only to goods which have not been specifically listed in one of the preceding tariff headings of Part II of the same Chapter.
Since carbon paper is specifically listed in tariff heading 48.13, sets of paper such as those at issue in this case cannot therefore be considered as 'Other
paper ...' within the meaning of tariff heading 48.15 and classified under that heading.
Such sets do not fall under either tariff heading 48.13 or heading 48.15, since General Rule 3 of the Rules for the Interpretation of the Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff, which refers to goods classifiable under two or more tariff headings, does not apply to them.
In these circumstances these sets must be classified for tariff purposes under one of the tariff headings 48.16 to 48.21 of the same chapter.
5 Tariff heading 48.18 covers not only certain articles expressly defined therein but also 'other stationery of paper ...' which has not been specifically listed in an other tariff heading of the Chapter and which is not made up simply by cutting but involves more elaborate working.
The Explanatory Notes to the Brussels Nomenclature which define the scope of tariff heading 48.18 state that it covers inter alia 'a variety of paper stationery ... or blocks'.
Having regard to the way in which the goods are made up and to the working process which they have undergone they represent goods referred to in that heading.
6 For these reasons the answer to the question referred to the Court should be that tariff heading 48.15 of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as meaning that it does not include goods consisting of two sheets of DIN A 4 format stuck together, one of which is carbon paper and the other flimsy
JUDGMENT OF 15. 12. 1977 - CASE 63/77
paper, as such goods must be classified under tariff heading 48.18 as 'other stationery of paper'.
Costs
7 The costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities which has submitted observations to the Court are not recoverable.
Since these proceedings are, in so far as the parties to the main action are concerned, a step in the action pending before the national court, costs are a matter for that court.
On those grounds,
THE COURT (First Chamber),
in answer to the question referred to it by the Bundesfinanzhof, by order of 5 April 1977, hereby rules:
Tariff heading 48.15 of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as meaning that it does not include goods consisting of two sheets of DIN A 4 format stuck together, one of which is carbon paper and the other flimsy paper, as such goods must be classified under tariff heading 48.18 as 'other stationery of paper'.
Bosco Mertens de Wilmars O'Keeffe
Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 15 December 1977.
A. Van Houtte G. Bosco
Registrar President of the First Chamber