← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·Rozsudok·27.5.1982

C-49/81

ECLI:EU:C:1982:203

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61981CJ0049

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (FIRST CHAMBER) 27 MAY 1982 '

Paul Kaders GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Waltershof (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof)

(Common Customs Tariff — Vegetable extracts and resinoids)

Case 49/81

Common Customs Tariff— Tariff headings — "Essential oils and resinoids" within the meaning of heading 33.01 — Concept — Gingerol — Exclusion

"Essential oils and resinoids" of products character of the product, do not fall which contain, in addition to odoriferous within heading 33.01 of the Common substances, a far higher proportion of Customs Tariff. In particular, a product other plant substances, such as such as gingerol is not among the chlorophyll, tannins, bitter principles or odoriferous substances which fall within other flavouring substances, carbo­ the said tariff heading, since its essential hydrates and other extractive matter characteristics are determined largely by which help to determine the typical taste and not by smell.

In Case 49/81

R E F E R E N C E to the Court under Anicie 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof [Federal Finance Court] for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

PAUL KADERS G M B H , Hamburg,

and

HAUPTZOLLAMT [Principal Customs Office] HAMBURG-WALTERSHOF,

I — Linžuilte et' tnr Ca»r Gfrmar

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 1982 — CASE 49/81

on the interpretation of tariff heading 13.03 (vegetable extracts) and tariff subheading 33.01 C (resinoids) of the Common Customs Tariff laid down in Council Regulation No 2723/76 of 8 November 1976 (Official Journal 1976, L 314),

THE COURT (First Chamber)

composed of: G. Bosco, President of Chamber, A. O'Keeffe and T. Koopmans, Judges,

Advocate General: P. VerLoren van Themaat Registrar: H. A. Rühi, Principal Administrator

gives the following

JUDGMENT

Facts and Issues

The facts of the case, the course of which contains all the constituent sub- the procedure and the observations stances of the ginger root, which include submitted pursuant to Anicie 20 of the essential oils, as well as gingerol, resin, Protocol on the Statute of the Court of starch etc. A maximum of 25°/: of the Justice of the European Economic extract consists of essential oil. Community may be summarized as follows: The defendant in the main action. :he Haupizollami [Principal Customs Office] Hamburg-Waltershof (hereinafter re- ferred to as "the Hauptzollamt") I — Facts and written p r o c e d u r e classified the product in question as a vegetable extract falling under tariff heading 13.23 of the Common Customs The plaintiff in the main action imports Tariff. Subsequently, following an imo the Federal Republic oi Germanv. expert's repon b\ the Zolltechnische among other extracts o! spices, extract of Prufungs- und Lehranstalt (Customs ginger In Mav 1977 u imponed a Laboratory and Training Collect"! product described as extract ot ginger Hamburg, the Haupizollami classified from the United States of America. The the product as resinoid under tariff sub- product consists of extract oi the pinger heading 33.Cl C and made a retroactive rooi extracted by means ot a solvent. lew of customs dun .

KADERS v HALTTZOLLAMT HAMBURG-VAITERSHOF

lanrr heading 13.03 covers vegetable the literature on the subject as vegetable saps and extracis apart from the products extracts which were used as spices in the listed in Notes (a) to (ij) of Chapter 13. manufacture of food-stuffs. In the Under Note (h) to that Chapter, a Federal Republic of Germany, they were vegetable extract falls under tariff also known as extracts of spices and heading 33.01, not tariff heading 13.03, were used for the same purpose as if it constitutes essential oils, concretes, natural spices, but brought out the absolutes and resinoids. fragrance of the extracted substance

more fully. The plaintiff lodged an abjection and action before the Finanzgericht [Finance The Finanzgericht considered that the Court] Hamburg, both of which were imponed product exhibited the charac- unsuccessful, claiming that the imported teristics of resinoids or oleoresins. It extract of ginger was to be classified as a found that it indisputably contained 23% vegetable extract because, as well as the oil of ginger and other substances which essentia!

oil of ginger, the product could be extracted from ginger. contained all the typical contents and constituent substances of ginger, that is to say chlorophyll, tanins, bitter principles, carbohydrates and so on, and In its appeal on a point of law to the was used chiefly as a spice for meat Bundesfinanzhof, the plaintiff claimed products, soups, vegetables, sauces, etc. that the product was a vegetable extract containing all the contents of ginger, as . well as essential oils to a maximum of The Finanzgericht took the view that the about 25%, and that unless it could be imported extract of ginger was considered as essential oil or resinoid it indisputably a vegetable extract which, had to be classified under tariff heading however, according to Note (h) to 13.03. According to the plaintiff, Chapter 13 of the Common Customs essential oils under tariff heading 33.01 Tariff did not fall within tariff heading were products in which the presence of 13.03 if it displayed the characteristics of fragrant substances constituted an resinoids under tariff heading 33.01. essential characteristic. The essential oils

According to the Explanatory Notes to contained in the imponed extract of the Customs Cooperation Council ginger did not make it a resinoid. since it Nomenclature, products similar to was not extracted on account of its concretes extracted, usually by solvent negligible odoriferous constituents action, from various dried parts of plants (essential oils) or used for that reason as were described as resinoids. According to a fragrant substance in the perfume the Explanatory Notes to the Customs industry. The extract of ginger was Tariff of the European Communities, characterized rather by us other resinoids were remarkable inasmuch as contents, including the gingerol which they reproduced the fragrance of the determined its taste and equallv caused it extracted substance.

Resinoids were to be used as a spice. It ought therefore often called oleoresins. In the Annex to to be classified under tariff heading the Explanatory Notes to Chapter 33 of 13.C3. the Customs Cooperation Council Nomenclature, the list of resinoids also included inter MÍJ resinoids ol ginger. According to the Explanatory Notes on tariff headings 13.C3 and 33.CI, the decisive factor for the purpose of tariff In accordance with those considerations, classification was not the plant from resinoids or oleoresins were described in which the vegetable extract was

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 1982 — CASE 49/8!

obtained, but only the proportion of heading 13.03 that the character of odoriferous substances (essential oils) resinoids was determined by their contained therein. As a result, it was not fragrant (as regards smell and taste) significant that in the Annex to the substances. The proportion of Explanatory Notes to the Customs odoriferous substances contained in an Cooperation Council Nomenclature extract was not decisive. (Chapter 33) ginger was also mentioned, In the Hauptzollamt's opinion, the since it was indisputable that oil of Finanzgericht had made no error with ginger was also extracted from the regard to the content, meaning and ginger root and used as a fragrant scope of the Explanatory Notes to the substance in the perfume industry. Customs Tariff of the European However, oil of ginger had nothing in Communities on tariff heading 33.01. common with extract of ginger which They were intended only as clarification contained all the typical constituent sub- and might therefore be applied stances of ginger and was used as a retroactively.

spice. The plaintiff also stated that the Expla- The Bundesfinanzhof consideres that the natory Notes to the Customs Tariff, to reply to the question concerning the wnich the Finanzgericht referred, were lawfulness of the contested notice of no adopted until 4 April 1978. At the assessment depends on the interpretation time of importation, in May 1977, they of the concepts "vegetable extracts" and did not exist. As a result, it was "resinoids" contained in the Customs. impossible for the Finanzgericht to refer Tariff. to them retroactively in order to By order of 10 February 1981, the Bun- interpret the Customs Tariff. That also desfinanzhof decided to stay the applied to the Explanatory Notes to the proceedings pending before it and refer Customs Tariff of the European to the Court for a preliminar}· ruling the Communities on tariff heading 13.03. following questions: The Hauptzollamt argued before the Bundesfinanzhof that the imponed "How must tariff heading 13.03 oleoresin of ginger was an extra« from (vegetable extracts) and tariff subheading an aromatic plant, obtained by means of 33.01 C (resinoids) be interpreted and organic solvents, and containing all the delimited in relation to one another?

Is a typical constituent substances of ginger product described as extract of ginger root and was remarkable in so far as it containing, in addition to 25% essential contained in a highly concentrated form oils, all the soluble contents of the ginger all the fragrant constituents of the root to be regarded as vegetable extract natural spice, whose fragrance it coming within tariff heading 13.03, or. reproduced more fully than could the oil having regard to the amounts of present in the raw material. By its odoriferous substances of fragrant method of extraction, its properties and constituents, as resinoid falling within its use. such a product was characterized tariff heading 33.C1 C, even though as as a resinoid. vegetable extract it contains all the tv-pical contents and constituent sub- According to the Hauptzollamt.

Note stances of the ginger root? In addition to (hi to Chapter 13 expressiv provided that the essential oils, does for example tariff heading \i.Zi did not applv to "Gingerol" also belong to the retinoids, which were to be classified odoriferous substances or fragrant under tariff heading 33.21. constituents?" It was clear from the French and English versions of the Explanatory- Notes to the The order for reference was lodged at Customs Cooperation Council on tariff the Court Registry on <* March 1981.

KADERS v HAUPTZOUAMT HAMBURG-VALTERSHOF

In its order for reference, the Bun- and the wording of tariff heading 33.01, desfinanzhof takes the view that it is not under tariff heading 13.C3 but under impossible to classify the imported tariff heading 33.01. According to the product as essential oil because, in Explanatory Notes, resinoids differ from addition to oil of ginger as an essential vegetable extracts under tariff heading oil, it contains other constituent sub- No 13.03 inasmuch as they are stances of ginger. Classification of the essentially composed of odoriferous sub- product in question under tariff heading stances. It is further noted in the Expla- 33.01 is therefore possible only if for the natory Notes that, according to whether purposes of the tariff it may be the steam distillation or the solvent considered to be a resinoid. Neither the process is employed, certain plants can wording of Note (h) on Chapter 13 nor give either the essential oils of heading tariff heading 33.01 indicate the way in 33.01 or the extracts falling within which the term "resinoid" is to be heading 13.03. An extract differs from an interpreted. essential oil in that it contains, apan from the odoriferous constituents, a far According to the Bundesfinanzhof it higher proportion of other plant sub- follows from the fact that tariff heading stances (for example chlorophyll, 33.01 includes resinoids as well as tannins, bitter principles, carbohydrates essential oils that the composition of the and other extractive matter). former must be different from that of

essential oils. Nevertheless, it cannot be The plaintiff's opinion that vegetable inferred from the wording of tariff extracts fall under tariff heading 13.03 in headings 13.03 and 33.01 that vegetable so far as they contain all the typical extracts must necessarily always be constituents of the original product and classified as resinoids under tariff may be considered to be essential oils heading 33.01 where, as in the case of and resinoids only if they contain solely the extract of ginger in question, they the truly odoriferous constituents may be have a 25% content of essential oils. If supported by the fact that, on the one the situation were otherwise all vegetable hand, valerian and garlic extracts, for extracts would always be classified under example, fall under tariff heading 13.03

(cf. Subparagraph (8) of the second tariff heading 33.01 if they contained paragraph of Subheading A of the Expla- even trifling quantities of essential oils, natory Notes to the Customs Co- with the result that tariff heading 13.03 operation Council Nomenclature regard- would be largely reduced to a mere ing tariff heading 13.C3) and, on the cipher. other, valerian and garlic oils or resinoids are listed in the Annex to the The Bundesfinanzhof considers that the Explanatory Notes to the Customs Co- Explanatory Notes to the Customs Co- operation Council Nomenclature operation Council Nomenclature and regarding Chapter 33 as falling under those to the Customs Tariff of the tariff heading 33.01. European Communities are not capable

of solving the existing problems of interpretation. The Explanatory Notes to the Customs Tariff of the European Communities on According io the Explanatory Notes to tariff subheading 33.: 1 C. adopted in the Customs Cooperation Council June I97S. that is io say after the time of Nomenclature regarding tarifi heading importation, which is determinam, also 13.C3, (subheading (A), note (k) on fail io remove the existing doubts as to excluded products), which were in force the classification of extract of ginger. ai the time of importation, resinoids fall, According to the notes, resinoids according to Noie (hi on Chapter 13 extracted from certain parts of plants are

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 19S2 — CASE 49/S1

remarkable in that they reproduce the Advocate General, the Coun decided to fragrance of the extracted substances open the oral procedure without anv more fully than does the essential oil preparatory inquiry. By order of alone which is generally present in the 26 October 1981, the Coun decided to raw material. As the Finanzgericht also assign the case to the First Chamber. The considered, those Explanatory Notes are panies and the Commission were to some extent incompatible with the requested to provide funher information Explanatory Notes to the Customs Co- on the practice in the various Member operation Council Nomenclature on States in relation to the tariff classi- tariff heading 13.03. As regards the fication of the product concerned. concept, for tariff classification purposes, of resinoids, those notes state, albeit not unequivocally, that they must be composed essentially of odoriferous sub- stances. The Explanatory Notes to the II — W r i t t e n observations sub- Customs Tariff of the European mitted to the Court Communities on tariff heading 33.01 do not go into that point. Furthermore, they establish a connexion between the fragrance and the essential oil contained Paul Kaders GmbH, the plaintiff in the in the raw material, which leads to the main action, claims that in this case it is conclusion that in the main only essential necessary to determine what is meant by oils and not other flavouring substances vegetable extracts described as resinoids such as gingerol, for example, are to be under tariff subheading 33.01 C of the considered as odoriferous substances Common Customs Tariff and how they indicative of resinoids. should be delimited in relation to other vegetable extracts under tariff heading 13.03. Finally, the Bundesfinanzhof considers that there is also doubt whether the Explanatory Notes to the Customs Tariff In that regard, reference should first be of the European Communities should be made to tariff heading 13.03. which applied retroactively, since they were not includes all vegetable saps and extracts published until after the time of impor- except for the products listed in Notes tation. (a) to (ij) to Chapter 13 which are classified under a more specific tariff heading. Those goods may be divided on In accordance with Anicie 20 of the a systematic basis into four groups, Protocol on the Statute of the Court of group (d) of which covers vegetable Justice of the EEC, written observations extracts containing cenain constituents »ere submitted by Paul Kaders GmbH, (Notes (g) and (h)). Apan from tanning represented by H. Heemann. of Messrs. or dyeing extracts, the lauer group Modest, Rechtsanwälte, Hamburg, and covers essential oils, concretes, absolutes by the Commission of the European and resinoids which should be classified Communities, represented by P. under tariff heading 33.03. Karpcnstein. Legal Adviser, acting as Acent. assisted bv Rolf Streckmann, tax consultant. Franktun am Main. The plaintiff claims that the title of Chapter 33, "Essential oils and resinoids; perfumery, cosmetic or toilet prep- Upon heanng the repon of the Judge- arations", shows that the Customs Tariff Rapponeur and the views of the equates essential oils and resinoids and

KADERS v HAUPTZOLLAMT HAMBURG-TALTERSHOF

that it classifies them among perfumery, odoriferous substances, they also contain cosmetic or toilet preparations. all the other constituent elements and because resinoids differ from vegetable extracts under Chapter 13 in so far as, in It is clear from definitions to be found in essence, they contain only odoriferous dictionaries that resinoids are obtained substances and not in addition the other from odoriferous resins and balsams and constituent elements of the raw material. are used as fragrant and odoriferous substances in the perfume and soap industry for the manufacture of perfumen', toilet and- cosmetic The plaintiff states that as regards the

preparations. The same is true of classification of a vegetable extract as a essential oils extracted from various resinoid under tariff subheading 33.01 C, plants by reason of their odoriferous it is not essential that in addition to its nature, which are chiefly used as scented other constituent elements it should also products in the soap, perfume and contain at least the odoriferous sub- cosmetic industry. stances typical of its fragrance (essential oils), but only that it should be extracted precisely because of its odoriferous sub- stances, and that in the process its other Essential oils and resinoids thus share an constituents should be removed in whole essential characteristic in so far as they or in pan and that it should be used as a contain wholly or mainly odoriferous fragrant or scenting substance. constituents (essential oils) of the raw material, they are extracted for that reason and are used as scented products, in particular in the perfumery and soap As a result, according to the plaintiff, the

industry. As a result, they are different extract of ginger which it imported is not both in their composition and the use to a resinoid under tariff subheading which they are put from all the other 33.Cl C, because it was not extracted by vegetable extracts under tariff heading reason of its odoriferous constituent 13.03, which do not contain wholly or elements and also because it is not used mainly odoriferous constituents of as a scenting product in the perfume plants, which are not extracted by reason industn· by reason of the typical of the existence of the latter and which constituents of its fragrance (essential are not used as odoriferous products.

As oils). a result, the mere fact that other vegetable extracts also contain odoriferous substances (essential oils; is The imported extract of ginger is of no importance with regard to the characterized far more by its other distinction between tariff headings 13.03 constituents, including the gingerol and 33.01. which determines its taste. It is extracted by reason of its constituents and is used exclusively as a fragrant substance. That The authors of the Common Customs is why it is a vegetable extract which falls Tariff classified the typical raw materials within tariff subheading 13.03 and ot resinoids. thai is to sa\ resins and which, like all other vegetable extracts balsams, under Chapter 13 and noi obtained by reason of their fragrant sub- among resinoids. That shows that even stances and used as spices, does not fall balsams characterized by their odor- under a more specific tariff heading bv iferous substances are not classified virtue of the provisions of Chapter 13. among resinoids under tariff subheading Indeed. Notes (gi and (hi on Chapter 13 33.Cl C because, in addition to contain onl\ an exception for vegetable

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 1982 — CASE 49/81

extracts characterized by their dyeing, raw material. Resinoids intended for the tanning and odoriferous substances and food industry are also often called used accordingly. oleoresins."

The plaintiff contends that it is clear The decisive criterion characterizing a from the Explanatory Notes to the resinoid is thus the fact that it Customs Cooperation Council No- reproduces the fragrance more fully than menclature that in order to determine the essential oils contained in the raw whether a vegetable extract should be material are generally able to do. The classified under tariff heading 13.03 or point of reference which makes it under tariff heading 33.01, only the possible to say that the fragrance is proportion of odoriferous constituents reproduced more completely is (essential oils) of the vegetable extract is constituted by the essential oils of the

determinant. If, in addition to the raw material which in their turn common odoriferous constituents determine the odoriferous nature of the (essential oils), it contains a far higher extract, as is shown by the definition of proportion of other plant substances, the essential oils in the Explanatory Notes to vegetable extract concerned should be the Customs Tariff of the European classified under tariff heading 13.03. If, Communities on tariff subheading on the other hand, it is made up mainly 33.01 B: of odoriferous constituents (essential "Essential oils are rather complex oils), and contains only trifling quantities mixtures, the constituents of which are of other plant substances, it should be of varying importance, from the perfume classified under tariff heading 33.01 as

point of view. Some, by nature, spoil an essential oil or resinoid. The question the fragrance and are preferably whether a vegetable extract should be removed . . . " classified under tariff heading 13.03 or under tariff heading 33.01 is therefore That means simply that the essential oil determined not by the plant from which determining the odoriferous character of it is extracted but only by the proportion the vegetable extract contains in pan of odoriferous substance (essential oils) constituent substances which may affect which it contains. its fragrance, that is to say its The differentiation between tariff odoriferous character, and which must headings 13.03 and 33.C1 made by the therefore be removed.

That shows that Explanatory Notes assimilates resinoids the concepts of "fragrance" and of and essential oils and treats them equally "perfume" used in the Explana: ry from the point of view of tariff classi- Notes to the Customs Tariff of the fication, regardless of the differences European Communities on tariff sub- which exist between them in an headings 33.C1 B and C have the same individual case. meaning and refer to the general impression of essential oil or resinoid The Explanatory Notes to the Common provided by the smell. Customs Tariff on tariff subheading 33.: 1 C describe resinoids as follows: The same result is achieved on the basis of the concept of "oleoresins". _ newly- "Resinoide are extracted from certain introduced in the Explanatory Notes to pans of plants or trom cenam animal the Customs Tariff. substances by means of solvents They are remarkable in that they reproduce The concept of "oleoresin" has several the fragrance ot' the extracted substances meanings. The plaintiff cites the more tulK than does the essential oil definition provided by the Römpp alone which is generaliv present in the Chemistry Dictionary

KADERS v RWPTZOLLAMT HAMBURG-OTALTERSHOF

"Ambiguous concept which is used to constituents of the ginger root. For refer to balsams on the one hand and that reason it should be classified as concentrated extracts of spices on the a vegetable extract falling within other..." tariff heading 13.03, regardless of the fact that among its natural In English, it is in general customary to constituent elements there are also describe extracts of spices as oleoresins odoriferous substances (essential whereas in German the use of the word oils). "extract" remains prevalent to describe spices obtained from vegetable extracts. 3. The gingerol contained in the However, apart from that, the English extract of ginger is a flavouring customs authorities regard extracts of substance and not a scenting spices (usually called "oleoresins" in substance. Therefore gingerol is not English) as vegetable extracts falling among the odoriferous substances within tariff heading 13.03 and not as (essential oils) of the ginger root." resinoids. That shows that neither the name of The Commission observes that the Bun- oleoresin given by the American manu- desfinanzhofs first question concerns the facturer to the extract of ginger imported delimitation of tariff heading 13.03 in by the plaintiff nor the use of the relation to tariff subheading 33.01 C and concept of oleoresin in the Explanatory raises a problem of the interpretation Notes to the Customs Tariff of the of secondary legislation. The second European Communities on tariff heading question should be understood as 33.01 is decisive in relation to the classi- follows: fication of the spice-extract at issue and the dividing-line between tariff headings "Must a vegetable extract which contains 13.03 and 33.01. all the typical constituent elements and substances of the fruit or plant be In conclusion, the plaintiff suggests that classified as resinoid under tariff sub- the questions referred to the Court for heading 33.01 C, having regard to all of a preliminar)· ruling by the Bun- its odoriferous substances or fragrant desfinanzhof should be answered as ingredients?" follows: "1. Tariff heading 13.03 covers all In the Commission's view the third vegetable extracts which are question asks whether the odoriferous obtained by means of solvents and substances of an extract, such as contain all the typical plant sub- gingerol, may also be taken into stances (constituents). consideration to justify classification of Tariff subheading 33.01 C covers the extract as resinoid. vegetable extracts which are extracted by reason of their Seen in that way, the questions submitted odoriferous substances and used as concern first the delimitation of tariff scenting or odoriferous substances. heading 13.03 (vegetable extracts) and They differ from vegetable extracts tariff subheading 33.01 C (resinoids) of falling within tariff heading 13.03 in the Common Customs Tariff. The so far as they contain essentially wording of the two tariff' headings is the only the odoriferous substances of same today as it was at the time of the the plant. imports in question.

2. The extract of ginger at issue in this The Explanatory Notes to the Customs case contains all the typical Tariff' of' the European Communities on

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 1982 — CASE «1/81

tariff subheading 33.01 C were not capable of perceiving only pure tastes, amended until after the imports in that is to say, those which are sour, question, that is to say in April 1978. sweet, salty and bitter. The Commission contends that those Notes and the Explanatory Notes to The olfactory cells are to be found in the the Customs Cooperation Council back nasai cavity. The nose is connected Nomenclature and the Classification to the buccal cavity through the naso- Opinions thereon are only explanatory pharyngeal cavity. Vhen one chews or or clarificatory and cannot amend the drinks, fragrant substances reach the provisions of the Common Customs olfactory cells in the course of breathing Tariff itself. Therefore the Commission through the naso-pharyngeal cavity and considers that the Notes in question are produce an olfactory sensation which not decisive for the ruling to be given on combines with the gustative sensation the questions put to the Court; the and is absorbed by the latter.

All essential factor is the classification under gustative sensations, except the four pure the Common Customs Tariff. Tariff sensations referred to above, are mixed heading 13.03 refers only to vegetable perceptions of smell and taste. Much is saps and extracts. The introductory notes thought to be tasted when in fact it is to Chapter 13 provide that it does not smelted, but the two perceptions cannot apply to a series of vegetable saps and be separated since they are produced extracts, which are to be classified under jointly and simultaneously.

That is other headings. The essential oils and clearly demonstrated by the well-known resinoids are to be classified under apple-onion experiment: no difference in subheading 33.01 C. Other products taste is perceptible if the sense of smell is classified under Chapter 33 are neutralized by blocking the nostrils." distinguished from vegetable extracts classified under heading 13.03 by a pleasant smell or taste and are used as Consequently odoriferous and fragrant fragrant substances in the perfume substances cannot be clearly separated, industry or as flavouring substances in particularly because a large number of the food industry or constitute finished odoriferous substances are also fragrant products in themselves.

All those substances and vice versa. The two sub- products are specifically characterized by stances combined, but equally each of the qualitv of their smell or taste, in them individually, are described as the shon by their aroma. Under the scheme aroma of a substance. The words of the Customs Tariff itself, fragrant raw "odoriferous", "pleasant-tasting" and materials are referred to in the first three "fragrant" are virtually synonymous in tariff headings of Chapter 33, whereas German, English and French. mixtures and basic substances intended tor certain industries are cited in the The Common Customs Tariff itself does tariti heading and finished products in not make a clear distinction beieren the TWOtinal tariff headings. those concepts, because that «ould be

impossible. That is shown by the description of tariff heading 33.04 of the The Commission gives certain Common Customs Tariff, which, in the physiological details on human taste and German version, refers to "Riech- oder smell Aromastoftrn" ' [odoriferous or fragrant substances] in relation to the perfumen "The sense of taste is perceived b\ taste and Jood industriei. bud* » hich arc to be found mostk on the hack par. ai the tongue and root of I — l - j - . j : - · . -.-.r :- 1 -L- -,- \frvr- .'· irr :j*i·· the mouih Ho» ever, taste buds are

KADERS v HAUPTZOLIA-MT HAMBURG-TTALTERSHOF

The Commission contends that all the fragrant constituents of a plant; in tariff headings in Chapter 33 refer to addition to the essential oils which are products characterized by their not always present, they also contain fragrance. Therefore resinoids must not soluble resins, dyes and other substances, be considered as substances intended that is to say all plant substances which exclusively for the manufacture of are soluble in the solvent used. perfume or soaps. According to the well-established The Explanatory Notes to the Customs case-law of the Court, the objective Cooperation Council Nomenclature on quaJities of products, their objective tariff heading 13.03 provide that essential characteristics and properties (judgment oils and resinoids differ from the of 10 December 1975 in Case 53/75 vegetable extract covered by tariff Belgium v Vandertaelen and Maes [1975] heading 13.03 "in that they are ECR 1647) are the decisive criteria for essentially composed of odoriferous sub- their customs classification. The stances." characteristic of resinoids consists in their fragrance. Consequently, vegetable extracts of parts of plants or fruits, The Commission considers that odor- characterized by their properties of iferous constituents and "odoriferous flavour and smell, must be classified as substances" are synonymous. The resinoids within the meaning of tariff Common Customs Tariff again equates subheading 33.Cl C of the Common odoriferous substances with fragrant Customs Tariff. substances. It follows from that that "odoriferous" is synonymous with The Commission suggests that the "fragrant" for the purpose of the questions submitted to the Court for a Customs Tariff. The Commission preliminar)' ruling should be answered as considers that, in restricting the word follows: "odoriferous" to the sense of smell and refusing to attribute it also to the sense of taste, the plaintiff is mistaken. "1. Vegetable extracts whose character is determined by their fragrance fall. as resinoids. within tariff heading The Commission believes that the tariff 33.01 of the Common Customs classification of a vegetable extract as Tariff. resinoid is determined simply by the existence of odoriferous fragrant 2. The fragrance of resinoids under constituents. Unlike the plaintiff, which tariff heading 33.01 is determined by seeks to rely only on the proportion of all the fragrant extractive substances: essential oils, the Commission considers the fact that there is a pre- that the classifiction of a vegetable ponderance in weight or quantitv of extract as resinoid depends on all of its the fragrant substances of an extract fragrant constituents and thus, apan is not a decisive factor. from essential oils, on the existence of other extractive substances, particularly the substances which confer upon the 3 Characteristic fragrant substances product its characteristic taste or smell such a' gingerol ma\ also be taKcn and determine its value, and accordingly into account lor the customs classi- its marketing and use. fication o! the vegetable extrae: as resinoid under tariff heading }}Z\. in so far as thev contribute to the Resinoids are therefore extracts which fragrant propenie« ot a vegetable contain in a concentrated ¡orm aH tne extract "

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. 1982 — CASE 49/81

III — Oral procedure R. Streckmann, tax consultant of Frank- fun am Main, for the Commission of the At the sitting on 17 December 1981 oral European Communities. argument was presented by H. Heemann of Messrs. Modest, Rechtsanwälte, Hamburg, for the plaintiff in the main The Advocate General delivered his action, and P. Karpenstein, Legal opinion at the sitting on 18 February Adviser, acting as Agent, assisted by 1982.

Decision

1 By an order of 10 February 1981, which was received at the Court Registry on 9 March 1981, the Bundesfinanzhof [Federal Finance Court] referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty a number of questions on the interpretation of heading 13.03 (vegetable extracts) and subheading 33.01 C (resinoids) of the Common Customs Tariff.

2 In May 1977 the plaintiff in the main action imported from the United States of America a product described as "extract of ginger". The Hauptzollamt [Principal Customs Office] Hamburg-Waltershof classified the product in question as vegetable extract falling within tariff heading 13.C3 of the Common Customs Tariff. Subsequently, on the basis of a report of the Zolltechnische Prüfungs- und Lehranstalt [Customs Laboratory and Training College] Hamburg, the Hauptzollamt classified the product as resinoid falling within tariff subheading 33.01 C and made a retroactive levy of customs duty.

) The administrative objection to that second classification and the subsequent action before the Finanzgericht [Finance Court] Hamburg were unsuccessful. Before the Bundesfinanzhof, the plaintiff in the main action contended that the ginger extract was to be classified under tariff heading 13.03, because of its composition, characteristics and properties.

. Considering that the solution of the dispute depended essentially on the interpretation of the concepts of "vegetable extracts" and "resinoids" and on the determination of the appropriate criteria by a comparison of the respective concepts, the Bundesfinanzhof referred to the Court tor a pre- liminary ruling the following questions:

KADERS v HALTTZOLLAKfT HAMBURG-TALTERSHOF

" H o w must tariff heading 13.03 (vegetable extracts) and tariff subheading 33.01 C (resinoids) be interpreted and delimited in relation to one another? Is a product described as extract of ginger containing, in addition to 2 5 % essential oils, all the soluble contents of the ginger root to be regarded as vegetable extract coming within tariff heading 13.03 or, having regard to the amounts of odoriferous substances or fragrant constituents, as resinoid falling within tariff subheading 33.01 C, even though as vegetable extract it contains all the typical contents and constituent substances of the ginger root? In addition'to the essential oils, does for example "Gingerol" also belong to the odoriferous substances or fragrant constituents?"

s Chapter 13 of the Common Customs Tariff covers "lacs; gums, resins and other vegetable saps and extracts". According to Note (h) on the Chapter, it does not cover "essential oils, concretes, absolutes and resinoids (heading No 33.01) or aqueous distillates and aqueous solutions of essential oils". Subheading 13.03 A VIII covers "vegetable saps and extracts . . . Other".

6 Chapter 33 covers "Essential oils and resinoids; perfumen·, cosmetic or toilet preparations". Heading 33.C1, "Essential oils (terpeneless or not), concretes and absolutes; resinoids" includes subheading 33.01 C, "resinoids".

7 The plaintiff in the main proceedings claims that the product in question falls within subheading 13.03 A VIII because, in addition to the common odoriferous constituents (essential oils), it includes a far larger proportion of other plant substances. If, on the other hand, it consisted essentially of odoriferous constituents (essential oils) and contained only trifling quantmes of the plant, it should be classified under tariff heading 33.01 as an essential oil or resinoid.

? The Commission, on the other hand, considers that vegetable extracts whose character is determined bv their fragrance fall as resinoids within tariff heading 33.C1. The fragrance of resinoids under thai tariff heading is determined bv all of the extracted fragrant substances. The tact that there is or is not a preponderance in weight or quantity of fragrant substances of an extract is not a decisive factor. The Commission relies on the consideration that the taste of a substance cannot be judged separately from its smell. That is corroborated bv the tact that, in the Explanatory Notes to the Customs

JUDGMENT OF 27. 5. I9S2 — CASE 49/81

Cooperation Council Nomenclature, the title of tariff heading 33.04 includes, in the German version, the reference to "Riech- oder Aromastoffen" (odoriferous or fragrant substances). It infers from this that the essential characteristic of resinoids consists both in their smell and in their taste.

·> That view cannot be accepted. It does not take into account the fact that the other linguistic versions of the Explanatory Notes to the Customs Co- operation Council Nomenclature do not speak of "odoriferous or fragrant substances" but only of "odoriferous substances". Moreover, it is incompatible with Note (k) on heading 13.C3, which states that "An extract differs from an essential oil in that it contains, apart from the odoriferous constituents, a far higher proportion of other plant substances (for example chlorophyll, tannins, bitter principles, carbohydrates and other extractive matter)". In the same note it is stated that essences and resinoids falling within heading 33.01 differ from extracts under heading 13.C3 inasmuch as they are essentially composed of odoriferous substances.

10 From those considerations it may be inferred that "essential oils and resinoids" of products which contain, apart from odoriferous substances, a far higher proportion of other plant substances, such as chlorophyll, tannins, bitter principles or other flavouring substances, carbohydrates and other extractive matter which help to determine the typical character of the product do not fall within heading 33.CI of the Common Customs Tariff.

n In particular, a product such as gingerol is not among the odoriferous sub- stances which fall within the said tariff heading, since its essential charac- teristics are determined largely by taste and not by smell.

Costs

The costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities, which submitted observations to the Court, are not recoverable. As these proceedings are, in so far as the parties to the main proceedings are concerned, in the nature of a step in the action pending before the national court, costs are a matter for that court.

KADERS v HAĽPTZOLLAMT HAMBURG—WALTERS H O F

On those grounds,

T H E C O U R T (First Chamber)

in answer to the question submitted to it by the Bundesfinanzhof by order of 10 Februan' 1981 hereby rules:

1. "Essential oils and resinoids" of products which contain, in addition to odoriferous substances, a far higher proportion of other plant substances, such as chlorophyll, tannins, bitter principles or other flavouring substances, carbohydrates and other extractive matter which help to determine the typical character of the product, do not fall within heading 33.01 of the Common Customs Tariff.

2. A product such as gingerol is not among the odoriferous substances which fall within the said tariff heading, since its essential characteristics are determined largely by taste and not by smell.

Bosco O'Keeffe Koopmans

Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 27 May 1982.

For the Registrar

H. A. Rühi G. Bosco Principal Administrator President of lhe First Chamber

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.