← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·11.12.1986

C-215/85

ECLI:EU:C:1986:481

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61985CC0215

BALM v RAIFFEISEN HAUPTGENOSSENSCHAFT

OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL MANCINI delivered on 11 December 1986 *

Mr President, bility of the dough; and (c) the degree of Members of the Court, hardening, which is measured in amylogram units, depends on the relationship between the temperature and the viscosity of the dough. Hardening is measured by the 1. In this dispute between the Bundesanstalt Brabender method. A rye-flour suspension is für landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung heated in an amylograph vessel at a [Federal Office for the Organization of constantly rising temperature. As the Agricultural Markets, hereinafter referred to temperature rises, the progressive swelling as 'the Federal Office'], that is to say the of the starch grains increases the viscosity of German intervention agency, and Raiffeisen the paste. Beyond a certain temperature, Hauptgenossenschaft eG [hereinafter further swelling causes the grains to burst referred to as 'Raiffeisen'], the Bundesver­ and spill out their contents, which reduces waltungsgericht [Federal Administrative the viscosity of the paste. The degree of Court] is asking the Court to give a ruling viscosity is measured by a curve consisting on the interpretation and validity of the fifth of four sections, which rises in the first two indent of Article 6 (1) of Commission Regu­ sections and falls in the next two. The lation (EEC) No 1570/77 of 11 July 1977 maximum of 200 amylogram units is on price increases and reductions applicable reached in the first section, surpassed in the to intervention in cereals (Official Journal second and third sections and reached once 1977, L 174, p. 18). According to that more in the final section. provision, national intervention agencies 'may apply, at the time of intervention, a special increase of 3.11 units of account per tonne in respect of rye in production 2. Facts of the case: between August 1978 regions ... where that cereal is regularly and January 1979 the Federal Office bought sold for bread-making ... '. However, the into intervention from Raiffeisen over grant of that increase is subject to one 29 000 tonnes of bread rye harvested in condition, namely the rye must be of 1978. On several occasions Raiffeisen 'particularly good quality' which means that applied for the price increase referred to in 'the amylogram units, based on full milling, Regulation No 1570/77. However, its including the germ, with a hardening applications were rejected by the Federal temperature of the starch of at least 63° C, Office on the ground that the rye of which are not less than 200 units'. it had taken delivery did not satisfy the requirements laid down in the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) of that regulation. Tests carried out on the rye revealed an That wording may seem obscure. In fact, in amylogram curve showing that the order to understand the scope of that maximum of 360 amylogram units had provision, it is sufficient to bear in mind already been reached at a temperature of that: (a) the requirement to which it refers 60°C, whilst at the temperature required by concerns the suitability for baking of flour the aforesaid provision, namely 63° C, the made from bread rye; (b) the suitability of number of units on the now redescending the flour depends on the hardening capa­ amylogram curve was only 280.

* Translated from the Italian.

OPINION OF MR MANCINI —CASE 215/85

Raiffeisen then instituted proceedings in the The Bundesverwaltungsgericht is a court of Verwaltungsgericht [Administrative Court], last instance. It therefore stayed the Frankfurt am Main, challenging the proceedings and decided, pursuant to the importance attached by the Federal Office third paragraph of Article 177 of the EEC to the path of the curve and asking for the Treaty, to refer the following questions to Federal Office's decisions to be annulled. the Court for a preliminary ruling: However, the action was dismissed by judgment of 24 September 1981. The court took the view that, at a temperature of at '1 . How is the expression "hardening least 63°C, the number of amylogram units temperature" contained in the fifth was to reach 200 for the first time, and indent of Article 6 (1) of Commission consequently the required coordinate (200 Regulation (EEC) No 1570/77 of 11 units at a temperature of 63° C) had to be July 1977 on price increases and on a rising amylogram curve. reductions applicable to intervention in cereals, as originally enacted, that is to say before its amendment by Article 1 (4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) Raiffeisen appealed against that judgment to No 2160/84 of 26 July 1984, to be the Verwaltungsgerichtshof [Higher Admin­ interpreted, and in particular is it to be istrative Court] Hessen. That court allowed interpreted as meaning that: the appeal and ordered the Federal Office to grant the price increase sought by Raiff­ eisen. It held that the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) does not expressly provide that the (a) all temperatures passed through figure of 200 amylogram units at a during the hardening process con­ temperature of 63° C, which is a precon­ stitute "hardening temperatures", or dition for the grant of the increase, must be reached in the first section of the curve. The condition laid down by that provision may (b) only the temperature reached at the therefore be regarded as satisfied even time of maximum viscosity consti­ where the figures concerned are found tutes the "hardening temperature"? together on a falling amylogram curve.

2. If part (a) of Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, how is the fifth indent of The Federal Office appealed against that Article 6 (1) as a whole to be in­ judgment. In the proceedings before the terpreted, and in particular is it to be in­ Bundesverwaltungsgericht, it argued that terpreted as meaning that: the only rational interpretation of the contested provision was that the number of amylogram units is to be measured at the summit of the curve and that the (a) the coordinate of not less than 200 temperature is to be recorded at the time of units at a hardening temperature of maximum viscosity. The reason for that at least 63° C must be reached on a requirement is simple: rye-flour becomes rising amylogram curve, or less suitable for baking where the curve is falling. It follows that where rye has already passed the figure of 200 amylogram units on (b) is it sufficient if, at a hardening reaching the threshold temperature of 63° C, temperature of at least 63°C, the it no longer has the properties needed for units on a redescending amylogram the grant of a price increase. curve are not less than 200?

BALM v RAIFFEISEN HAUPTGENOSSENSCHAFT

3. If part (b) of Question 1 or part (a) of are of the same quality and should Question 2 is answered in the therefore qualify for the same price affirmative, does Community law increase based on quality?' contain a general principle of equality corresponding to Article 3 (1) of the Grundgesetz [Basic Law] of the Federal 3. I propose to consider Question 1 first. I Republic of Germany, to the effect that would recall that Raiffeisen favours the the Council and the Commission, when interpretation set out in Question 1 (a) (the enacting regulations, are under an obli­ expression 'hardening temperature' encom­ gation, in laying down the rules passes all the temperatures passed through applicable to factual situations, to treat during the hardening process), whilst the the same (equivalent) situations in the Commission and the Federal Office favour same manner and therefore to attach the the opposite interpretation (that expression same legal consequences to them? refers only to the temperature reached at the time of maximum viscosity of the dough). 4. If Question 3 is answered in the affirmative, is the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) of the aforementioned regulation Raiffeisen starts from the 'factual' premise contrary to the obligation of equal that hardening does not occur suddenly but treatment and therefore unlawful in so is the result of a process consisting of far as, as is alleged by the plaintiff, various stages (setting in motion, swelling, shrinking) and spans a certain period of time. If, therefore, it is to reflect that state of affairs, the expression 'hardening (a) the bread rye referred to in that temperature' can refer only to a group of provision, the amylogram units of temperatures, namely those which are which (based on full milling, recorded between 48°C and 75° C, which including the germ) are not less than correspond to the start of the increase in 200 on the rising amylogram curve hardening and the abrupt end of the process at a hardening temperature of at respectively. least 63° C, and

That interpretation, moreover, is supported (b) the bread rye at issue, the by a number of factors, starting with the amylogram units of which (based on wording of the contested provision. full milling, including the germ) in According to Raiffeisen, it is indisputable certain cases that, had it considered the temperature at the time of maximum viscosity to be decisive, the legislature would have used the (i) reach 610 or 470 units on the expression 'final hardening temperature' or rising amylogram curve at a would have required the temperature of hardening temperature of 61°C, 63°C to be measured 'at the summit of the and, subsequently, curve'. That is borne out by the fact that those expressions are used in the amendment which was made to the provision in question, albeit after the (ii) still reach 560 or 390 units on material events in this case, by Commission the falling amylogram curve at a Regulation (EEC) No 2160/84 of 26 July hardening temperature of 63° C 1984.

OPINION OF MR MANCINI —CASE 215/85

Further proof is furnished by earlier versions Another factor which inclines me in favour of the fifth indent of Article 6 (1). Orig­ of the interpretation suggested by the inally, the Commission had laid down that Commission and by the Federal Office can the number of amylogram units shown on be derived from Regulation No 2160/84. I the curve should not be less than 330 (see am well aware that the latter regulation was the fourth indent of Article 6 (1) of Regu­ adopted subsequently, in relation to the lation (EEC) No 1415/69 of 22 July 1969, material events in this case, and I do not Journal Officiel 1969, L 182, p. 11; and the therefore intend to have recourse to the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) of Regulation words ('summit of the curve') which it (EEC) No 1493/71 of 13 July 1971, Official inserted in the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) in Journal, English Special Edition 1971 (II), order to clarify the scope of that provision p. 509). The requirement that the (see, moreover, paragraph 6 of the Court's temperature was to be at least 63°C for the judgment of 15 September 1983 in Case grant of that increase was introduced only 293/82 Papierfabrik Schoellershammer [1983] with the adoption of Regulation (EEC) No ECR 4219). Instead I would draw the 1833/76 of 28 July 1976 (Official Journal Court's attention to the third recital in the 1976, L 203, p. 28), which at the same time preamble to that regulation which states that reduced the number of amylogram units to 'it is established practice' to measure the 200. viscosity of the dough with a Brabender amylograph.

Finally, Raiffeisen relies, in support of its argument, on the objectives pursued by Regulation No 1570/77, which contains the provision at issue. The preamble to that regulation states that the price increase is to That practice can be traced back to March be granted where the rye 'meets minimum 1976, when the International Association physical and 'technological criteria as to for Cereal Chemistry adopted Standard quality'. Raiffeisen points out that that Method ICC No 126, which was taken over sentence is deliberately couched in general by the Commission a few months later. That terms. Thus the legislature's purpose would is borne out by the first recital in the be frustrated if a court did not treat as preamble to Regulation No 1833/76, which eligible for the price increase all rye which, states that since 'the criteria as to quality having regard to the degree of hardening of required for granting the ... increase no the dough, may be considered suitable for longer correspond to present commercial bread-making. practices', it is necessary to amend the rules in force 'in accordance with market practices'. If that is so, and if the Community legislature has been referring to the Brabender method since the mid-1970s, 4. I am not swayed by those arguments. In Raiffeisen's reference to the earlier versions the first place I would point out that, in of the contested provision becomes wholly specifying the threshold temperature at irrelevant. It is indisputable from a technical which the number of amylogram units must point of view that, according to that be not less than 200, the legislature refers to method, at a temperature of at least 63°C 'a hardening temperature'. Hence, in my the 200 amylogram units must be measured view, to interpret those words as referring for the first time on the rising amylogram to a range of temperatures is dangerous to curve, and consequently at the time of say the least. maximum viscosity of the dough.

BALM v RAIFFEISEN HAUPTGENOSSENSCHAFT

The plaintiff's final argument is as weak as the first time at a temperature of at least the other arguments which it has advanced. 63°C is of 'particularly good quality'. That I do not believe that, merely by stating that was recognized by Raiffeisen's own expert rye must meet 'minimum physical and tech­ who acknowledged at the hearing that nological criteria as to quality', the fifth 'where the number of amylogram units in recital in the preamble to Regulation No products is high but the hardening 1570/77 is laying down a general or, to use temperature of those products is less than Raiffeisen's own words, an 'abstract' 63° C at the summit of the amylogram requirement. That expression is defined by curve, the crust detaches itself appreciably, the contested provision which requires not there is a tendency for water to accumulate that rye should be 'generally suitable' for beneath the crust and the elasticity of the bread-making but that it should be of crumb is very weak or even defective'. 'particularly good quality' (I would draw attention to the difference between those 5. My conclusion renders Question 2 words and the wording — 'sound, fair and devoid of purpose. With regard to of marketable quality' — used in Article 5 Questions 3 and 4, I would merely point (2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No out that the principle of equality exists in 1629/77 of 20 July 1977, Official Journal Community law and is in no way 1981, L 181, p. 26, to define the properties encroached upon by the fifth indent of which common wheat of bread-making Article 6 (1). Since the price increase is quality must possess in order to qualify for granted to producers of rye which is of intervention). 'particularly good quality', the different There is no doubt that only rye dough treatment accorded to rye of lesser quality which has reached maximum viscosity for would appear to be objectively justified.

6. In the light of all the foregoing considerations, I suggest that the Court answer the questions submitted to it by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht by order of 9 May 1985 in the proceedings between the Bundesanstalt für landwirtschaftliche Markt­ ordnung and Raiffeisen Hauptgenossenschaft eG in the following manner:

The expression 'hardening temperature' in the fifth indent of Article 6 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1570/77 of 11 July 1977 on price increases and reductions applicable to intervention in cereals must be interpreted as referring to a temperature of at least 63°C which is reached, on the curve described by a Brabender amylograph, at the time of maximum viscosity of the dough.

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Navrhy_ga C-215/85 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik