C-213/87

OPINION OF MR TESAURO —CASE C-213/87

2. Although the Court has consistently held regard not only to its wording but also to (see in particular the judgment of 25 its context and to all the legal rules October 1984 in Case 185/83 University governing the matter in question. of Groningen [1984] ECR 3623) that the statement of grounds required by Article 190 of the Treaty must disclose in a clear The conciseness of the statement of and unequivocal fashion the reasoning reasons for a decision by which the followed by the Community authority Commission refuses assistance from the which adopted the measure in question in European Social Fund for a vocational such a way as to make the persons training course is an unavoidable conse- concerned aware of the reasons for the quence of the processing by computer of measure and thus enable them to defend several thousand applications for their rights and the Court to exercise its assistance upon which the Commission supervisory jurisdiction, nevertheless the must adjudicate within a short period. A authority is not required to give details more detailed statement of reasons in of all relevant factual and legal aspects. support of each individual decision The question whether the statement of would therefore be likely to compromise grounds for a decision meets those the rational and efficient allocation of requirements must be assessed with the financial assistance from the Fund.

O P I N I O N OF T H E ADVOCATE GENERAL

M r Advocate General T e s a u r o delivered his Opinion on 13 December 1989. ^ H e proposed that the C o u r t should dismiss the application and order the applicants to pay the costs.