C-19/88

OPINION OF MR DARMON — CASE 19/88

OPINION OF THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

Mr Advocate General Darmon delivered his Opinion on 14 December 1988. * He proposed that the Court should rule that:

Electronic apparatus which fulfils functions of checking and monitoring electronic components by measuring electrical quantities does not fall under subheading 90.28 A II (a) but subheading 90.28 A II (b) provided that no other major function of the apparatus justifies its classification under another heading.

* Original language: French.