C-132/88
ECLI:EU:C:1990:83
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61988CC0132
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL MISCHO delivered on 22 February 1990 *
Mr President, 4 In that judgment the Court first Members of the Court, emphasized that
1 The Commission asks the Court to find that 'as Community law stands at present the Member States are at liberty to subject certain products such as cars to a system of road tax which increases progressively in 'by establishing and maintaining, in the amount depending on an objective criterion, form of a special consumption tax and the such as the power rating for tax purposes, single supplementary special tax, a system of which may be determined in various ways taxation which discriminates against new Such a system of domestic taxation is, and used cars with a cylinder capacity of however, compatible with Article 95 only in more than 1 800 cc imported from other so far as it is free of any discriminatory or Member States, the Hellenic Republic has protective effect' (paragraphs 12 and 13) failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 95 of the EEC Treaty'
The Court then went on to say: 2 Details of the legislation in question are given in the Report for the Hearing and accordingly I shall refer to them here only to the extent necessary for my reasoning to be followed 'in the absence of considerations relating to the amount of the special tax, consumers seeking comparable cars as regards such 3 In support of its application, the matters as size, comfort, actual power, Commission relies principally on the maintenance costs, durability, fuel judgment of 9 May 1985 in Case 112/84 consumption and price would naturally Humblot [1985] ECR 1367, which was choose from among cars above and below concerned with a special tax in France the critical power rating laid down by levied each year on cars which exceeded a French law However, liability to the special given fiscal power rating, which was nearly tax entails a much larger increase in five times higher than the highest amount of taxation than passing from one category of the progressive tax payable in respect of cars car to another in a system of progressive of a lower rating taxation embodying balanced differentials
* Original language: French
I - 1576
COMMISSION v GREECE
like the system on which the differential tax However, it cannot in my view be asserted is based' (paragraph 15) that that is so in the case of very small cars (for example, those shorter than 3 7 m, with an engine of less than 1 000 cc), on the one 5 The Court concluded that Article 95 hand, and top-of-the-range cars (longer prohibited the charging of such a tax where, than 4 7m and with a cylinder capacity of as in that case, the only cars on which it was 2 500 cc or more), on the other levied were imported, particularly from other Member States
9 On the other hand, there may well exist, 6 In its judgment of 17 September 1987 in on either side of a given cylinder-capacity Case 433/85 Feldain [1987] ECR 3521, the threshold, for example 1 800 cc as in the Court held that rules which, by providing present case, cars which, despite a fairly for a particular system of tax bands, resulted considerable difference of cylinder capacity, in domestically manufactured top-of-the- are sufficiently close 'as regards size, range cars being protected from the normal comfort, actual power' and so on (see progression of the tax had a discriminatory Humblot) for it to be possible to regard or protective effect within the meaning of them as satisfying the criterion which I have Article 95 of the Treaty, which favoured referred to It is possible, in particular, that, such cars despite the difference in cylinder capacity, the pre-tax price of such cars might be almost the same The Commission was 7 In both cases the national court had therefore fully entitled to base its action on submitted a question as to the compatibility the first paragraph of Article 95 in so far as of the tax systems in question with Article its complaint relates to the taxation of cars 95 in its entirety and the Court answered whose cylinder capacity is around 1 800 cc accordingly In the present case, however, the Commission asks you to establish an infringement of the first paragraph of Article 95 It maintains in particular that 10 Let us now consider what conclusions must be drawn regarding the differentiation 'the cars in question, regardless of their which the Greek taxation system operates cylinder capacity, are similar products' at the 1 800 cc threshold The Greek (letter prior to action, cited in paragraph I 2 Government contends that it is justified of the application) because cars with a larger cylinder capacity are 'luxury cars'
8 I cannot share that view The Court has held that similar products are those that 11 In that respect it can rely on the judgment of 16 December 1986 in Case 'have similar characteristics and meet the 200/85 Commission v Italy [1986] ECR same needs from the point of view of 3953, which indicates that it is neither consumers' ' arbitrary nor unreasonable to treat cars in excess of a given cylinder capacity as luxury 1 — See in the first place, the judgment of 17 February 1976 in products and to subject them to the higher Case 45/75 Rewe v Hauptzollamt Landau [1976] ECR 181 paragraph 12 rate of VAT levied on such products within
I-1577
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
the tax system of a Member State I am higher than that exhibited by the two Greek therefore astonished that the Commission taxes at the threshold of 1 800 cc should claim, even in its rejoinder (paragraph II 7), that
14 If Italy was thus entitled to take a 'to classify an 1 800 ce car as a luxury car, in comparison with a car of 1799 cc cylinder capacity of 2 000 cc (or 2 500 cc — which is not so classified — is in the case of diesel engines) as the point for arbitrary' moving into the higher tax classification, there is no apparent reason why Greece should not be fully entitled to adopt a cylinder capacity of 1 800 cc for that In making that claim, it is challenging not purpose That threshold does not mark the only the threshold chosen by the Hellenic exact point at which domestic manufacture Republic but also, in general, the very ceases, since no vehicle with a capacity of principle of taxation differentiated on the between 1 600 and 1 800 cc is assembled in basis of a given threshold linked to cylinder Greece The lower tax rate is still enjoyed, capacity The same reasoning could be in so far as they are exported to Greece, by applied to any threshold, for example 2 000 cars as comfortable as the Audi 100 with or 2 500 cc an engine of 1 781 cc, the BMW 518i (1 795 cc), the Opel Omega 1 81 (1 796 cc), the Peugeot 505 SX 1 8 (1 796 cc), 12 The Court stated in Case 200/85 the Renault 21 GTS (1721 cc) or the Commission v Italy that Volkswagen Passat (1 781 cc)
'reference to a particular cubic capacity as the differential threshold between two rates of taxation is an objective criterion that 15 The choice of the second threshold takes no account of the origin of products' seems to me to be even less arbitrary or (paragraph 10) unreasonable since it is consistent with the relevant Greek tax system as a whole, which already places a tax differential threshold at Because of the very general nature of that the level of 1200 cc The Greek statement, it seems to me to be of scant Government explained that the two thre importance that cars which are above a sholds in question are regarded as reflecting given threshold are, or are not, classified as luxury products
'the social circumstances prevailing in 13 It should also be noted that there does Greece and, to some extent, in Europe: cars not seem to be any need to confine the with a cylinder capacity of 1 200 cc or less scope of the judgment in Case 200/85 to are intended for people with low income, the particular area with which it was those with a cylinder capacity of 1 201 to concerned, and specifically the matter of 1 800 cc are bought by people whose VAT, as the Commission wishes to do (see income is in the middle range; and those of paragraph 16 of its application), especially above 1 800 cc are, above all in Greece, since, in relative terms, the increase of the only for people with very substantial rate of VAT in the Italian case, at the thre incomes' (see p I-1574 of the Report for sholds of 2 000 and 2 500 cc, was much the Hearing)
I-1578
COMMISSION v GREECE
16 Since the Commission has not denied reductions of duty, serve legitimate social that the threshold of 1 200 cc makes it purposes possible to separate cars intended for people with low incomes from those designed for people in the middle-income range, it is 19 To concede that such objective differen difficult to see why it objects to the tiation becomes incompatible with Article 95 threshold of 1 800 cc as the boundary line merely because the heavier taxation in fact between the latter and cars intended for only affects imponed products would be to those with high incomes deny the Member States that freedom
17 It is true that, by contrast with cars 20 In that connection, it is significant that exceeding 1 800 cc, cars exceeding 1 200 cc in the great majority of the cases in which are produced in Greece However, that the Court has considered differentiated factor alone cannot be decisive As the taxation to be contrary to Article 95, it Court has consistently held 2 found that the criterion on which the differentiation was based was such that in advance it excluded imported products from the favourable tax regime or else it excluded 'at its present stage of development domestic products from the more onerous Community law does not restrict the tax regime 4
freedom of each Member State to lay down tax arrangements which differentiate between certain products, even products which are similar within the meaning of the 21 I consider therefore that tax differen first paragraph of Article 95, on the basis of tiation based on a criterion recognized as objective criteria, such as the nature of the objective does not — suddenly — cease to raw materials used or the production be objective and become incompatible with processes employed Such differentiation is Article 95 solely because there are no compatible with Community law if it domestic products which meet the pursues objectives of economic policy which conditions for the higher tax rate, provided are themselves compatible with the that the imported products are not 'by defi- requirements of the Treaty and its nition', 'ex hypothesľ or 'inherently' the only secondary legislation, and if the detailed ones which could meet those conditions rules are such as to avoid any form of discrimination, direct or indirect, in regard to imports from other Member States or any form of protection of competing domestic 22 The Court expressly applied the products' foregoing principle in its judgments of 14
3 — See in addition to Commission v France supra paragraph 7 in particular the judgment of 10 October 1978 in Case 148148//77 Hansen and Balle v Hauptzollamt Flensburg ( 1978 1978]] ECR 1787 paragraph 16 18 It is apparent from the previous 4 — See judgments of 7 May 1981 in Case 153 153//80 Rumbaus decisions of the Court that such differen Hansen v Hauplzollamt Flensburg [19811981]] ECR 1165 of 27 May 1981 in Joined Cases 142 and 143 /80 Ammini 143/ tiation is also permissible if the tax benefits strazione delle finanze dello Stato v Essevi and Salengo granted, in the form of exemptions from or [1981 1981]] ECR 1413 of 15 March 1983 in Case 319 319//81 Commission v Italy [ 1983 1983]] ECR 601 (taxation of spirits ), of spirits), 11July 1985 in Case 278 278//83 Commission v Italy [ 1985 1985]] 2 — See in particular the judgments of 4 March 1986 in Case ECR 2503 ( VAT VAT—— taxation of sparkling wines } of 4 wines} 106 106//84 Commission v Denmark [ 1986 1986]] ECR 833,, 833 March 1986 in Case 106 106//84 Commission v Denmark [19861986]] paragraph 20 and of 7 April 1987 in Case 196 /85 196/ ECR 833833,, and of 7 April 1987 in Case 196 196//85 Commission Commissioni France France((1987 1987)) ECR 1597 paragraph 6 v France [ 1986 ] ECR 1597 1986]
I- 1579
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
January 1981 in Case 140/79 Chemial prohibited under Article 95 of the Treaty, Farmaceutici v DAF [1981] ECR 1, and in could have confined itself to referring to its Case 46/80 Vinal v Orbat [1981] ECR 77 judgment of 27 February 1980 in Case (taxation of denatured alcohol) when it held 171/78 Commission v Denmark [1980] ECR that: 447 (tax arrangements applicable to spirits), in particular paragraph 36, according to which a tax system of that kind contains incontestable discriminatory or protective characteristics, even if a very small fraction 'The application of such tax arrangements of imported products benefits from the most [which impose heavier charges on synthetic favourable rate of tax and a certain denatured alcohol than on denatured proportion of domestic production comes alcohol obtained by fermentation] cannot within the same tax category as imported be considered as constituting indirect products However, it did not only refer to protection of national production of alcohol that judgment (paragraph 28), but it also obtained by fermentation within the expressly contrasted with it its 'differen meaning of the second paragraph of Article tiated taxation' case-law, pointing out that 95 of the EEC Treaty on the sole ground that their consequence is that the product subject to the heavier taxation is in fact a product which is exclusively imported from other Member States of the Community' 'however at the present stage of its development and in the absence of any unification or harmonization of the relevant provisions, Community law does not 23 In the same context, one may also point prohibit Member States from establishing a 5 system of taxation differentiated according out, as does Professor Everling, that it also follows from the judgment of 3 March 1988 to various categories of products provided in Case 252/86 Bergandi [1988] ECR 1343, that the tax benefits granted serve legitimate that a system of differentiated taxation for economic or social purposes' (para various categories of games machines, which graph 29) pursues legitimate social objectives, is not discriminatory or protective merely because almost all the most heavily taxed products are imported
The Court went on to add (paragraph 31) that:
24 If that had in fact been the case, the court, in reply to a preliminary question as to whether the fact that a Member State levied on automatic gaming machines for the most part originating abroad a tax three 'the Member States are in principle at times higher than that applied to similar liberty to subject products to a system of machines mostly produced domestically was taxation which increases progressively in amount according to an objective criterion, 5 — Professor Dr Ulrich Everling: Aktuelle Fragen der provided that the system is free from any europäischen Steuergerichtsbarkeit in Die Steuerberalung Bonn September 1988 p 281 at p 286 discriminatory or protective effects'
I-1580
COMMISSION v GREECE
25 At this stage we can therefore conclude 27 In order to check whether that is the that the Greek system of taxing cars, in so case as far as the contested Greek system is far as it is based on cylinder capacity as a concerned, it is necessary to examine sepa basis for differential tax rates, with a rately the two taxes in question threshold of 1 800 cc as from which the higher rate of tax is applicable, is not in principle incompatible with the first A — The special consumption tax paragraph of Article 95 of the Treaty even if, in fact, only imported cars fall within the most heavily taxed category of cars 28 The special consumption tax comprises two components The first relates solely to the car's cylinder capacity It is calculated as follows: DR 20 per cc for cars of 600 to 26 But for such a system of taxation to be 1 200 ce; DR 26 per cc for cars of 1 201 to truly lawful under Article 95, it must be 1 800 ce; DR 38 per cc for cars of more 'free from any discriminatory or protective than 1 800 cc The first component is 6 subject to a ceiling of DR 100 000 effect' It is apparent from Humblot and Feldain, cited earlier, that that is not the case where a 'special tax' 29 The second component of the tax is obtained by the following calculation:
'entails a much larger increase in taxation than [that which arises on] passing from one first component x 4 x V / category of car to another in a system of 100 000 progressive taxation embodying balanced 7 differentials' where V is the pre-tax price of the car less DR 25 000
In other words, as I pointed out in my Opinion in Case 200/85, a differentiated 30 The sum of those two components gives taxation system in which the highest tax amounts which correspond to a percentage affects only products imported from other of the pre-tax price of the car Because of Member States is not discriminatory (or the incidence of the first component of the protective) unless the latter is of a markedly tax, that percentage varies for each higher rate and additional cubic centimetre The minimum tax is 48% for a car of 600 cc, and the maximum is 400% for cars of 2 632 cc and above 'marks a break or a discontinuity with regard to the general taxation system to 31 To simplify its exposition of the which the category of products concerned is problem, the Commission makes a separate 8 subject' comparison for each band of 100 cc According to the Commission, the 6 — See Humblot [1985] ECR 1378, paragraph 13 Feldain [1987] ECR 3540 paragraph II and Bergandi [1988] progression of the special consumption tax ECR 1375 paragraph 31 is not balanced Up to 1 800 cc it increases 7 — See Humblot [1985] ECR 1379, paragraph 15 and Feldain [1987] ECR 3540 paragraph II on average by only 116 percentage points 8 — [1986] ECR 3966 (right hand column) per band of 100 cc; at 1 801 cc it first
I-1581
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
makes a sudden jump of 86 5 points, the entire cylinder capacity of the car, that thereafter growing at the average rate of is to say also to the part of the capacity 15 2 points per band of 100 cc corresponding to one or both of the lower categories In the Commission's view, that constitutes a 'break in the progression', which would not exist in a system in which the upper weightings applied only to the 32 That presentation of the progression of part of the cylinder capacity above the the tax does not, however, seem to me to be differential thresholds in question and in acceptable as it stands since it overlooks the which the bands below those thresholds fact that the Greek system also has a differential threshold at 1 200 cc If account continued to be subject to the lower rates is taken of the three categories of cars thus normally applicable to them created, the progression of the tax is as follows:
34 The following table illustrates the foregoing by comparing the rates calculated (i) as from 48% for a car of 600 cc, it according to the other more 'balanced' increases 8 points per band of 100 cc, method advocated by the Commission with reaching 96% at 1 200 cc; those applicable in the present system
Cylinder Present * Other * capacity system system (in cc)
(ii) at that first differential threshold, it jumps suddenly by 28 9 points at 1 100 88 % 88 % + 8 4- 8 1 201 cc, rising to 135 2% at 1 300 cc, 1200 96 % 96 % + 39,2 + 10,4 then growing regularly by 10 4 points 1300 135,2 % 106,4 % + 10,4 + 10,4 per band of 100 cc and reaching 1400 145,6 % 116,8% + 10,4 + 10,4 1 500 156 % 127,2 % 187 2% at 1 800 cc; + 10,4 + 10,4 1600 166,4 % 137,6 % + 10,4 + 10,4 1700 176,8 % 148 % + 10,4 + 10,4 1 800 187,2 % 158,4 % +101,6 + 15,2 1900 288,8 % 173,6 % + 15,2 + 15,2 (iii) at that second differential threshold, it 2 000 304 % 188,8 % + 15,2 + 15,2 makes the sudden jump mentioned by 2 100 319,2 % 204 % + 15,2 + 15,2 2 200 334,4 % 219,2 % the Commission (86 5 points); it + 15,2 + 15,2 2 300 349,6 % 234,4 % reaches 288 8% at 1900 cc, before + 15,2 + 15,2 2 400 364,8 % 249,6 % progressing by 15 2 points per band of + 15,2 + 15,2 2 500 380 % 264,8 % 100 cc, finally reaching a maximum 4- 15,2 + 15,2 2 600 395,2 % 280 % rate of 400% at 2 632 cc / / 2 632 400 % 284,8 %
35 A comparison of the two columns 33 The explanation for this large increase marked with an asterisk, which show the at the thresholds of 1 200 and 1 800 cc lies increase in rate per 100 cc band, reveals in the fact (which the Commission that the increase is identical in the two mentioned for the first time only in its systems, except when the transition is made rejoinder — paragraph 113) that the from 1 200 to 1 300 cc and from 1 800 to respective weightings of 26 and 38 apply to 1 900 cc: in the system advocated by the
I-1582
COMMISSION v GREECE
Commission, it would be, at those two thre and the second (156%) categories, namely sholds, of exactly the same order of 2 16, is the same as the ratio between the magnitude as that applicable to the other averages of the second and first (72%) 100 cc bands in the category in question categories It is immediately noticeable that the progression, as a whole, would thus be more balanced
39 Finally, allow me to remind the Court once again that the differentiation of the 36 Must a system which involves a sharp taxation at the threshold of 1 800 cc is increase in taxation at two different levels beneficial not only to Greek cars with a necessarily be regarded as inherently incom smaller cylinder capacity but also to patible with the first paragraph of Article 95 imported cars, in particular those of a of the Treaty? capacity exceeding 1 600 cc but less than 1 801 cc, of which none is produced in Greece at the present time
37 It will be recalled, in the first place, that Humblot was concerned with a 'special tax' and it was the subjection to that tax which gave rise to a 'break' from the taxation system that was otherwise applicable As I 40 I therefore consider that the actual said in my Opinion in Case 200/85, existence of the two taxation thresholds cannot be criticized Moreover, by contrast with the position in Feldain, the location of the two thresholds is not such as to permit 'the French tax [which affected only the inference that they were chosen in order imported cars] was, so to speak, outside the to favour domestically produced cars normal system for the taxation of cars, which consisted of a tax which increased progressively with the fiscal horsepower' ([1986] ECR 3966, last paragraph)
41 The question remains whether the same can be said of the percentages of tax which affect the three categories of cars On this In the present case the increase in the Greek point, the system at issue in Feldain did not tax at the threshold of 1 800 cc, beyond attract any criticism But in the present case which it affects only imported cars, is in certain points call for comment The tax on conformity with the logic of the Greek 1 200 cc cars is 96 % and the tax on cars of system which already involves a similar 1201 cc is 124 9%, giving a ratio of 1: increase at the threshold of 1 200 cc, which 1 30 The tax on 1 800 cc cars is 187 2 % affects Greek cars as well and the tax on cars of 1 801 cc is 273 7 % In the latter case, the ratio is 1: 1 46 The difference derives from the progression of the amounts, expressed in drachmas per 38 It is also true, as has been emphasized cubic centimetre, which apply to the three by the Greek Government, that the ratio categories of cars (the first component of between the averages of the third (337%) the tax) I would remind the Court that, for
I-1583
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
cars of up to 1 200 cc, the figure is DR 20 the first paragraph of Article 95 of the per cc For cars up to 1 800 cc the amount Treaty is DR 26 per cc, and for cars of 1 801 cc and above the figure is DR 38 per cc The ratios between those figures are the same as those determined for the tax as a whole, namely 1: 1 46 (38/26) and 1: 1 30 (26/20) If a ratio of 1: 1 30 were also applied as B — The single supplementary special tax between the second and third categories, the figure for the third category should be DR 33 8 instead of DR 38 In this case, the 'jump' at the 1 800 cc threshold would no longer be 86 5 points but only 56 2 points, and the tax would then progress by 13 52 45 Let us now consider the situation points for each additional 100 cc, instead of regarding the single supplementary special 15 2 points tax payable on first registration of the car
42 I consider that a system involving two 46 For cars with a cylinder capacity of less thresholds at which the taxation increases than 1 200 cc, this tax is DR 100 per cc, so sharply is permissible only if, at the second that it progresses by DR 10 000 per band of threshold, which affects only imported cars, 100 cc and reaches DR 120 000 at the the progression is not greater than the one 1 200 cc threshold For cars with a cylinder that affects both imported and domestic capacity of 1 201 to 1 800 cc, it is DR 100 products Indeed, if a ratio of 1: 1 46 were per cc for the first band of 1 200 cc and to be acceptable, why not a ratio of 1: 2 or DR 200 per cc for the band from 1 201 to 1: 3 or 1: 5, like the one at issue in 1 800 cc; it is thus DR 140 000 at 1 300 cc Humblotì and increases by DR 20 000 per band of 100 cc, so as to attain DR 240 000 at the 1 800 cc threshold On each side of the 1200 cc threshold, the single supple mentary special tax thus increases regularly, by DR 100 and DR 200 per cc respectively 43 A system of that kind must be consistent Moreover, it is apparent from the foregoing from start to finish, in other words it must that that differentiation in rates, in so far as display an internal logic which cannot be it is based on an objective criterion, that of faulted at any level of taxation cylinder capacity, would be perfectly lawful under the first paragraph of Article 95 of the Treaty even if Greece did not produce cars taxed at the higher rate
44 Since in the present case the rate or percentage of increase in the applicable tax at the 1 800 cc threshold is not the same as that which applies to the 1 200 cc threshold, 47 But, as in the case of the special I propose that the Court hold that the consumption tax, the Hellenic Republic special consumption tax is incompatible with applies a second differentiation of the single
I-1584
COMMISSION v GREECE
supplementary special tax at the 1 800 cc the part of the cylinder capacity in excess of threshold: for cars with a cylinder capacity 1 800 cc but also to the part between 1 200 exceeding 1 800 cc, the single sup and 1 800 cc Furthermore, for the part of plementary special tax is in fact DR 150 per the cylinder capacity below 1 200 cc, the cc for the first tranche of 1 200 cc and is rate is not DR 100 per cc, as it is for cars DR 300 per cc above 1 200 cc From of a cylinder capacity of less than 1 800 cc DR 240 000 at 1 800 cc it thus rises to (irrespective of whether their total cylinder DR 360 300 at 1 801 cc and then increases capacity is below or above 1 200 cc) but by DR 300 per cc DR 150 per cc
48. On the one hand, therefore, following the pattern below 1 200 cc, the progression above 1 800 cc is perfectly regular 50 The consequence of such divergences Moreover, the fact that it is DR 300 per cc between the calculation methods is as and is thus greater than the increase follows: whereas, for a car of a cylinder applicable to the bands below 1 800 cc capacity of 1 800 cc or less the tax increases constitutes a differentiation based on an by DR 200 per cc as from the 1 200 cc objective criterion which, in itself, is not threshold, for a car with a cylinder capacity objectionable, particularly since the increase of over 1 800 cc it does not increase by in the rate per cc above the 1 800 cc DR 300 per cc until it has leapt drastically threshold, after which point all the cars from DR 240 000 to DR 360 000 actually concerned are imported, is exactly the same at the 1 800 cc threshold In other words, as that applied at the 1 200 cc threshold, whilst a 1 201 cc car is subject to a tax of above which there are also Greek cars, and DR 120 200, which is only DR 200 more the progression in the rate per cc at the than that payable on a car of 1 200 ce, a 1 800 cc threshold is even lower ( 1 : 15) car of 1 801 cc is subject to a tax of than that which operates at the 1 200 cc DR 360 000 which, for its part, is threshold ( 1 : 2 ) DR 120 000 + DR 300 more than the tax on a car of 1 800 cc
49 One the other hand, however, the fact cannot be overlooked that for cars with a cylinder capacity of more than 1 800 cc the procedure for calculating the tax is no 51 The single supplementary special tax longer the same as that applicable above the too thus suffers a 'break in progression' at 1 200 cc threshold Whereas, for a car of a the 1 800 cc threshold, in so far as the cylinder capacity exceeding 1 200 cc (but calculation procedures applicable as from less than or equal to 1 800 cc), the highest that threshold are such that they entail an rate of the tax, namely DR 200 per cc, increase in taxation which is much greater applies only to the part of the cylinder than that which would result from the capacity which exceeds 1 800 cc, for a car application to that threshold, above which of a cylinder capacity of over 1 800 cc the there are only imported cars, of the calcu rate of DR 300 per cc applies not only to lation procedures applicable to the 1 200 cc
I- 1585
OPINION OF MR MISCHO —CASE C 132/88
threshold, above which there are also Greek domestic manufacture or the same cars at cars Indeed, if the same calculation method the second-hand stage or both which are were applied, namely DR 100 for the first placed at an advantage over imported 1 200 ce, DR 200 for the band between second-hand cars However, it must be 1 201 and 1 800 cc, and DR 300 above that concluded that, since both systems of tax figure, a 1 801 cc car would be subject to a have an inherent defect, namely excessive tax of DR 240 000 instead of DR 360 300 increase in tax as from the 1 800 cc This sharp 'jump' in the level of taxation, threshold, that defect has an impact on all which does not occur at the 1200 cc imported cars threshold, thus marks a break or discon tinuity with respect to the system of taxation normally applied Since the higher tax affects only cars imported from other 55 It must then be stated that, during the Member States, that system of taxation pre-litigation phase, the Commission also cannot be regarded as 'free of any discrimi criticized the detailed rules for determining natory or protective effect' within the the taxable amount for calculation of the meaning of Humblot and Feldain and is special consumption tax which is charged on therefore unlawful under Article 95 of the second-hand cars upon importation That Treaty tax is determined by reducing the price of corresponding new cars by 5% for each year of the car's age, but without any C — The taxation of second-hand cars deduction beyond four years, so that the total reduction cannot exceed 20% The Commission considers that as a result of 52 In its application, the Commission asks those rules the taxable amount for imported the Court to find that the Greek system of second-hand cars taxation is discriminatory as regards both new cars and second-hand cars Does that mean that, with respect to the taxation of second-hand cars, the Commission relies on 'is always higher than the net value of the the arguments relating to new cars which I corresponding domestically produced have examined here? vehicle on which the special consumption tax was paid when it was new' (reasoned opinion, paragraph 2 3) 53 The least that can be said is that the Commission's claims in that respect are far from clear The result is higher taxation for imported cars 54 In paragraph 22 of the application, the Commission asserts in a very laconic manner that 56 The Commission did not expressly reiterate that complaint, either in its application or in its reply It confined itself 'the foregoing considerations also apply, to making, at paragraph 22 of its mutatis mutandis, to second-hand cars' application, the statement which I have just cited At the hearing, the Commission's agent referred to that phrase, claiming that It would be desirable to know whether, in the Commission had thus mentioned that the Commission's view, it is new cars of complaint
I-1586
COMMISSION v GREECE
57 But 'the foregoing considerations' are in entitled to conclude that the Commission no way related to the question of determi had abandoned it, which, furthermore, nation of the taxable basis for cars, only to explains the fact that, in its defence and the procedures for calculation of the two rejoinder, it expressed no views on the taxes Therefore, in my view, the Hellenic matter That complaint must therefore be Republic, which, in the pre-litigation phase, regarded as inadmissible because it was contended that the complaint concerning made only at the pre-litigation stage the taxable basis was unfounded, was
Conclusion
58 For all the foregoing reasons, I propose that the Court find that by applying, in the form of the special consumption tax and the single supplementary special tax, a system of taxation which discriminates against cars with a cylinder capacity of more than 1 800 cc imported from other Member States, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 95 of the Treaty
59 Even though the Commission contended, wrongly, at the hearing that its action also related to the method of evaluation of the taxable amount for imported second-hand vehicles, I do not consider that that should have any repercussions concerning costs I propose that the Court order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs
I-1587