C-202/90
ECLI:EU:C:1991:237
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61990CC0202
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
OPINION OF MR TESAURO — CASE C-202/90
O P I N I O N O F M R ADVOCATE GENERAL TESAURO delivered on 4 June 1991 *
Mr President, State finance authorities. As a consequence, Members of the Court, the tax-collection activities entrusted to third parties were abolished. 3 However, local authorities, including communes, may assume responsibility for the collection of certain taxes and appoint collectors and enforcement agents for that purpose. 4 1. The questions referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía concern the inter- pretation of Article 4(1), (4) and (5) of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value The rules applicable to tax collectors are added tax: uniform basis of assessment 1 contained in the abovementioned provisions (which I shall hereinafter refer to as 'the on the tax system, and in the Statute on the Sixth Directive')· The national court asks, in Organization of Tax Collection and Tax particular, whether under the provisions of Collectors, 5 provisions which give quite a the Sixth Directive the activities of a tax clear picture of the nature of the activities in collector must be regarded as dependent or question. On the one hand, tax collectors independent, and if independent, whether are appointed by local authorities following they must in any event be exempted from competitions held for that purpose; they value added tax since they are activities carry out their activities under the control engaged in as a 'public authority'. of the treasuries of the local authorities which appointed them and they enjoy some rights and prerogatives peculiar to civil servants. O n the other hand, however, tax collectors are required to provide a security of an amount fixed by the local authority on I shall summarize the basic facts of the case behalf of which they carry out their below and refer to the Report for the tax-collection activities; they appoint inde- Hearing for the details. pendently the auxiliary staff for their respective zones and, more generally, they organize their own undertakings and receive by way of remuneration a collection premium consisting of a proportion of the sums collected and a part of the 2. A recent reform of the Spanish tax supplements applied in the event of late system, 2 in essence, gave responsibility for payment. the collection of taxes — both State taxes and those of autonomous bodies — to the 3 — Royal Decree No 1451 of 27 November 1987 (BOE of 28 November 1987). 4 — Article 193 of the amended law on the rules governing * Original language: Iulian. local authorities, Royal Decree No 781 of 18 April 1986 1 — OJ L 145, p. 1. (BOE of 22 and 23 April 1986). 2 — Royal Decree No 1327 of 13 June 1986 (BOE of 2 July 5 — Decree No 3286 of 19 December 1969 (BO del M° Hac. 1986). of 30 December 1969).
I - 4256
AYUNTAMIENTO DE SEVILLA
3. When the tax collectors of the first and tax 'employed and other persons . . . in so second zones of the Commune of Seville far as they are bound to an employer by a calculated the amount of the collection contract of employment or by any other premium, they added on VAT. The legal ties creating the relationship of Commune contested the passing on of VAT employer and employee as regards working before the Tribunal Económico-Adminis- conditions, remuneration and the trativo Provincial, Seville, which, having employer's liability'. regard to the administrative instructions laid down by the Directorate-General of Taxes, dismissed the action on the ground that tax collectors were to be regarded as inde- pendent professionals since they engaged in 5. In my view, tax collectors are certainly their activities regularly and independently, not employed persons or bound to the tax and for valuable consideration; they were authorities by a contract of employment in therefore taxable persons for the purposes the narrow sense. Therefore, in order to of VAT. establish whether an activity of the kind described above can be considered to be exempt from VAT, it is necessary to determine whether the relationship between the tax collector and the tax authorities takes the form of a legal tie creating the The Commune of Seville appealed against relationship of employer and employee as that decision to the Tribunal Superior de regards working conditions, remuneration Justicia, Andalucía, which decided to refer and liability. the case to this Court for a preliminary ruling.
It is for the national court to make such a finding, on the basis of the interpretation 4. With its first question, the national court given by the Court of Justice of the seeks an interpretation of Article 4(1) and provisions applicable in the present case, (4) of the Sixth Directive on VAT in order and consequently on the basis of the criteria to determine whether the activities of tax to be applied in order to determine whether collectors are carried out independently and or not a given activity is carried out inde- are therefore chargeable to tax. pendently.
6. With regard to working conditions, the Let me remind the Court first of all that first thing to be determined is whether the Article 4(1) defines a taxable person as worker in question forms a part of the anyone who 'independently' carries out any employer's organization — in the present economic activity, whatever the purpose or case the communal administration — or results of that activity. I would add that the whether he is free to organize his activity concept of an economic activity covers all independently, and to what extent. The activities of producers, traders and persons freedom to organize one's own work inde- supplying services. Article 4(4) goes on to pendently (to choose colleagues, the give a negative definition of the term structures necessary for the performance of 'independently' in that it excludes from the one's tasks and one's working hours), in
I - 4257
OPINION OF MR TESAURO — CASE C-202/90
conjunction with the fact of not forming In the present case the tax collector bears part of the organization of an undertaking the entire economic risk in so far as any or an administrative authority, are charac- taxes he fails to collect translates into a loss teristic features of an activity which is of earnings, which would not be the case if carried out independently. he were bound to the commune by a contract of employment since in that case he would still be paid whether or not he collected the taxes.
On the other hand, while it is part of the relationship between employer and employee for an employer to be able to give I now come, finally, to the issue of liability. a worker instructions and to have a certain In the present case a distinction must be control and disciplinary power over him, made between liability arising as a result of those circumstances are not incompatible the tax collector's own conduct and liability with an activity which is carried out inde- arising from the taxation, that is to say pendently. In fact, a requirement to take relating to the appropriateness of the tax. It instructions from another person can be is clear that the tax collector can be held clearly seen in relationships whose object is liable only for the former and that, an activity which is indisputably inde- therefore, it must be determined, on the pendent, such as contracts for work; and as basis of the applicable national legislation, this Court has already had occasion to hold whether the worker in question is liable in connection with the professions of vis-à-vis third parties for his own acts and notaries and bailiffs, the fact of being conduct. subject 'to disciplinary control under the supervision of the public authorities (a situation to be found in other regulated professions) . . . is not a sufficient ground for regarding notaries and bailiffs as persons who are bound by legal ties to an employer within the meaning of Article 4(4)'. 6 From the foregoing considerations, it is clear that the term 'independently' in Article 4(4) of the Sixth Directive on V A T must be interpreted as meaning that an independent worker is one who does not form part of the organization of an under- taking, who has sufficient freedom to With regard to the method of remuneration, organize the human and material resources the fact that pay (albeit fixed by law 7 ) is necessary for the activity in question to be according to the individual services and is carried out and who bears the economic risk therefore uncertain is clear evidence of the of that activity. existence of an independent employment relationship. It is obvious that in a relationship of employer and employee, the economic risk can fall only on the employer.
6 — Judgment in Case 235/85 Commission v Netherlands 7. By its second question, the national court [1987] ECR 1471, paragraph 14. 7 — See in this regard the judgment in Case 235/85, op cit., asks whether the activities carried out by a paragraph 14. tax collector are to be regarded as exempt
I-4258
AYUNTAMIENTO DE SEVILLA
from VAT pursuant to the first activity carried on by a private individual is subparagraph of Article 4(5) of the Sixth not exempted from VAT merely because it Directive since they are activities engaged in consists in carrying out acts falling within 'as a public authority'. Under that provision, the prerogatives of the public authority'. 9 bodies governed by public law are excluded That pronouncement is surely applicable to from tax in respect of the activities in which the present case. Moreover, the delegation they engage as public authorities. of tax collection to a third party, who provides such a service, for valuable consideration and on an independent basis, First of all, as the Court itself has pointed for the tax authority, produces a supply of out on a number of occasions, the Sixth services which, as such, is chargeable to tax Directive is characterized by its general pursuant to Article 4(1) of the Sixth scope and by the fact that all exemptions Directive on VAT. must be expressly provided for and precisely defined. In particular, it is clear from the provision in question that two conditions In short, even when, as in the present case, must be fulfilled in order for the exemption it is not disputed that a given activity is, in to apply: the activities must be carried out principle, part of the prerogatives of the by a body governed by public law and they public authority, the activity cannot be must be carried out by that body acting as a exempted under the first subparagraph of public authority. 8 Article 4(5) of the Sixth Directive when it is not carried out directly by a body governed by public law, but is entrusted to a supplier However, as the Court held in Case 235/85, of services who is a third party vis-à-vis the cited above, the foregoing means that 'an body itself.
8. In t h e light of the foregoing considerations, I therefore p r o p o s e that the C o u r t s h o u l d give the following reply t o the questions referred by t h e T r i b u n a l Superior d e Justicia d e Andalucía:
(1) T h e t e r m 'independently' u s e d in Article 4(4) of the Sixth Directive is t o be i n t e r p r e t e d as meaning t h a t a n i n d e p e n d e n t activity is an activity carried o u t by a taxable person w h o is n o t organically part of an u n d e r t a k i n g or an adminis- trative authority, w h o has sufficient o r g a n i z a t i o n a l f r e e d o m with regard t o the
8 — Sec the judgments in Case 107/84 Commission v Germany [1985] ECR 2655, paragraph 11 ; Case 235/85, cited above, paragraph 21; and Joined Cases 231/87 and 129/88 Comune de Carpando Piacentino and Others [1989] ECR 3233, paragraph 12. 9 — Judgment in Case 235/85, cited above, paragraph 21.
I - 4259
OPINION OF MR TESAURO — CASE C-202/90
human and material resources used in carrying out the activity in question and who bears the economic risk entailed in that activity.
(2) The first subparagraph of Article 4(5) of the Sixth Directive must be inter- preted as meaning that an economic activity which consists in carrying out acts falling within the prerogatives of the public authority are not excluded from the scope of VAT when they are not exercised directly by a body governed by public law but are entrusted to a supplier of services who constitutes a third party vis-à-vis the body itself.
I - 4260