T-6/90

JUDGMENT OF 6. 12. 1990 —CASE T-6/90

not challenged within the time-limits laid reopening of those time-limits and justify down in Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff consideration of such an application (see Regulations for lodging a complaint or the judgments in Case 28/72 Tontodonati appeal. v Commission [1973] ECR 779, in Case 173/80 Blasig v Commission [1981] ECR 1649, in Case 190/82 Blomefield v Commission [1983] ECR 3981, in Case Only the existence of a substantial new 326/82 Aschermann v Commission [1984] fact capable of adversely affecting the ECR 2253 and in Case 231/84 Valentini person concerned can lead to the v Commission [1985] ECR 3027).

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 6 December 1990*

In Case T-6 / 90 ,

Alessandro Petrilli, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels, represented by J. L. Lodomez, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of E. Arendt, 4 avenue Marie- Thérèse,

applicant,

APPLICATION for the annulment of the decision of 17 November 1989 rejecting the applicant's complaint lodged following the Commission's failure to reply to his request for review of his classification, submitted on 16 January 1989,

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber),

composed of: C. Yeraris, President of Chamber, A. Saggio and B. Vesterdorf, Judges,

(The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced.)

hereby:

(1) Dismisses the application as inadmissible;