← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·Rozsudok·10.12.1991

C-19/91

ECLI:EU:C:1991:471

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61991CJ0019

COMMISSION v BELGIUM

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 10 December 1991 *

In Case C-19/91,

Commission of the European Communities, represented by Xavier Lewis, a member of its Legal Service, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Roberto Hayder, a representative of the Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,

applicant,

v

Kingdom of Belgium, represented by J. Devadder, Adviser in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Belgian Embassy, Résidence Champagne, 4 Rue des Girondins,

defendant,

Application for a declaration that, by failing to comply with the judgment delivered by the Court of Justice on 24 May 1988 in Case 307/86 Commission v Belgium [1988] ECR 2677 on the transposition into Belgium law of Council Directive 87/714/EEC of 4 October 1982 laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels (Official Journal 1982 L 301, p. 1), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty and in particular Article 171,

* Language of the case French.

I - 5939

JUDGMENT OP IO. 12. 1991—CASE C-19/91

THE COURT ,

composed of: O. Due, President, Sir Gordon Slynn, R. Joliét and P. J. G Kapteyn (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, C. N. Kakouris, G. C. Rodríguez Iglesias, M. Diez de Velasco and J. L. Murray, Judges,

(The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced.)

hereby:

1. Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 May 1988, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty;

2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

I - 5940

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Rozsudok C-19/91 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik