← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·4.4.1995

C-391/92

ECLI:EU:C:1995:94

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
61992CC0391

COMMISSION v GREECE

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL LENZ delivered on 4 April 1995

Summary

A — Introduction I - 1624

B — Opinion I - 1626

I — Applicability of Article 30 of the Treaty I - 1626

II — The pharmacists' monopoly as a measure having equivalent effect I - 1629

III — Justification of the measure I - 1631

1. Imperative requirements relating to consumer protection 1-1631

2. Protection of health and life of humans I - 1633

(a) Infant formula as a medicinal product I - 1633

(b) Low birth rate and infant mortality I - 1637

3. Comparable arrangements in other Member States I - 1640

C — Conclusion I - 1641

* Original language: German.

I -1623

O P I N I O N O F MR L E N Z — CASE C-391/92

A — Introduction ings in April 1988. It maintains that imports would have been more straightforward had Article 10 of the Decree at issue not been adopted. Following the pre-litigation pro- cedure, the Commission brought an action before the Court in November 1992.

1. In the infringement proceedings with which this Opinion is concerned, the Com- mission claims that the Court should declare that the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of the EEC 3. In its application, the Commission main- Treaty ' by providing in Article 10 of Minis- tains that the provision constitutes a measure terial Decree N o A 2/oik. 361 of 29 January having equivalent effect to a quantitative 1988 that processed milk for infants may be restriction on imports within the meaning of sold only in pharmacists' shops. The con- Article 30 in accordance with the 'Dasson- tested provision constitutes a pharmacists' ville test'. 4 Admittedly, there are no Com- sales monopoly for formulae for infants up munity provisions relating to trade channels to the age of five months. Only one excep- for infant formulae and hence in principle tion to the sales monopoly is provided for, competence lies with the Member States. for municipalities possessing no pharmacists' However, that competence may be exercised s h o p . 2 In such locations, infant formulae only in accordance with the provisions of the may also be sold otherwise than in pharma- Treaty. The fact that trade is channelled as a cists' shops on certain conditions. 3 result of the sales monopoly constitutes a measure having equivalent effect within the meaning of the judgments in Destre 5 and Monteil and Samanni, 6 which cannot be jus- tified.

2. The origin of the infringement proceed- ings is a complaint brought by the Greek Association of Infant Formulae Undertak- 4. The Greek Government maintains for its part that the provision does not constitute a 1 — The E C Treaty since 1 November 1993 as a result of the Treaty on European Union of 7 February 1992 (OJ 1992 C 224). 2 — According to the Greek Government's submissions, only a small number of municipalities in the mountains or on thinly 4 — Judgment in Case 8/74 Dassonville [1974] ECR 837, para- populated islands in which medicinal products are normally graph 5. sold by doctors or State regional distribution centres are 5 — Judgment in Case C-369/88 Delattre [1991] ECR 1-1487, involved. paragraph 51. 3 — Provision of a special counter within the shop complying 6 — Judgment in Case C-60/89 Monteil and Samanni [1991] with public health stipulations. ECR 1-1547, paragraph 38.

I - 1624

COMMISSION v GREECE

measure having equivalent effect. After the ingly, it is necessary to ensure that advice is introduction of the measure, consumption of available when the product is sold and only a infant formulae remained constant year-on- pharmacist, on account of his special expert year, which suggests that it had no restrictive knowledge, can provide this. effect. Moreover, the Greek Government argues that in any event the measure was jus- tified. It relies in that connection on protec- tion of public health. It refers in the first place to the particular climatic conditions in Greece. In addition, the low birth rate and relative high infant mortality in Greece necessitate drastic measures. 6. The Greek Government further maintains that, in the event of the product's becoming spoiled or being recalled by the manufac- turer, only pharmacists are capable of react- ing quickly and efficiently on account of the infrastructure available to them. In addition, pharmacists' professional obligations, breach of which is subject to sanctions, afford a guarantee that the requisite care will be taken in storing and selling infant formulae.

5. It argues that infant formulae have the characteristics of medicinal products and accordingly it is appropriate that they should be available only on a doctor's prescription. This is the reason why they are sold exclus- ively by pharmacists' shops. In addition, it is sought to promote breast feeding for the 7. In addition, Greece did not constitute an good of babies' health. The majority of each exception in adopting the provision in ques- year's approximately 110 000 newborn tion. Other Member States also had compa- babies are wholly or partly botde-fed. That rable systems for the sale of infant formulae. type of feeding is associated with particular dangers as a result, for instance, of choosing a product which is not the optimum one for meeting the baby's needs or of unsuitable preparation. Labelling is not sufficient to provide information about the composition and proper preparation of infant formulae on account of the poor degree of education — 8. Since the written procedure ended prior even illiteracy — of a large proportion of to delivery of the judgment in Keck and Greek women of childbearing age. 7 Accord- Mithouard, 8 in which the Court altered its case-law on measures having equivalent

7 — In the defence it is stated that the illiteracy rate is 55%. In response to the Commission's submission that the rate is 2.4% at the worst, the Greek Government conceded that the 8 — Judgment of 24 November 1993 in Joined Cases rate was 1.9%, but that 49% of the women in question had C-267/91 and C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR at best only attended primary school. 1-6097.

I - 1625

B

effect within the meaning of Article 30, the tative restrictions on imports in the follow- parties were given the opportunity to express ing terms: their views in writing on this case-law and its possible consequences for this case.

'all trading rules ... which are capable of hin- 9. In that regard, the Commission main- dering, directly or indirectly, actually or tained its view that the case involved a meas- potentially, intra-Community trade'. " ure having equivalent effect within the mean- ing of Article 30, a view which it supported by argument at the hearing. For its part, the Greek Government argued that the provi- sion at issue constituted selling arrangements within the meaning of the judgments in Keck Since the Cassis de Dijon judgment 1 2 it has and Mithouard9 and Hiinermund10 and been clear that provisions which are applica- therefore for that reason alone did not fall ble to domestic and foreign products with- within the scope of Article 30. out distinction also constitute measures hav- ing equivalent effect within the meaning of Article 30.

B — Opinion

11. Accordingly in principle both State pro- visions relating to p r o d u c t s u and those I. Applicability of Article 30 of the Treaty relating to marketing , 4 fall within the scope of Article 30. In the case of provisions relat- ing to marketing, a development can be per-

11 — Judgment cited in footnote 4, paragraph 5. 10. An important preliminary issue in decid- 12 — Judgment in Case 120/78 Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmo- ing this case relates to the applicability of nopolverwaltung für Branntwein [1979] ECR 649. 13 — Cf. the judgments in Case 120/78 Rewe-Zentral AG v Article 30, which in any event appears to Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein, cited in foot- warrant consideration following the judg- note 12, in Case 178/84 Commission v Deutschland [1987] ECR 1227, in Case 216/84 Commission v France [1988] ment in Keck and Mithouard. Since the judg- ECR 793, in Case 90/86 Zoni [1988] ECR 4285 and in Case 76/86 Commission v Germany [1989] ECR 1021. ment in Dassonville the Court has defined 14 — Judgments in Case 75/81 Blesgen [1982] ECR 1211, in Case measures having equivalent effect to quanti- 286/81 Oosthoek's Uitgeversmaatschappij [1982] ECR 4575, in Case C-362/88 GB-INNO-BM [1990] ECR 1-667, in Case C-369/88 Delattre, cited in footnote 5, in Case C-60/89 Montea and Samanni, cited in footnote 6, in Case C-239/90 Boscher [1991] ECR 1-2023, in Joined Cases C-l/90 and C-176/90 Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior 9 — Cited in footnote 8. [1991] ECR 1-4151, in Case C-271/92 Laboratoire de pro- 10 — Judgment of 15 December 1993 in Case C-292/92 Hiiner- thèses oculaires [1993] ECR 1-2899 and in Case mund [1993] ECR 1-6787. C-315/92 Clinique Laboratoires [1994] ECR 1-317.

I - 1626

COMMISSION v G R E E C E

ceived since the 1980s which has the effect in restriction. ' 9 However, the Court held as the result of taking some State measures out- follows in paragraphs 16 and 17 of the judg- side the prohibition set out in Article 30 in ment: accordance with a balancing exercise which the Court invariably carries out. The path which the Court has taken in order to reach this result has differed. In some cases, it invoked justifying grounds within the mean- ing of Article 36, 1 5 at others it held that the measures in question did not even come within the scope of Article 30. I6

'16. However, contrary to what has previ- ously been decided, the application to prod- ucts from other Member States of national provisions restricting or prohibiting certain selling arrangements is not such as to hinder directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade between Member States within the meaning of the Dassonville judgment ..., pro- vided that those provisions apply to all affected traders operating within the national 12. Starting with the judgment in Keck and territory and provided that they affect in the Mithouard 17 — which has since been con- same manner, in law and in fact, the market- firmed on several occasions 18 — the Court ing of domestic products and of those from appears to have settled on a restrictive other Member States. approach to national marketing rules which are applicable without distinction. In the judgment, the Court does not speak of restricting its earlier case-law, but simply of 'clarifying' it. It also retains the form of words uncurtailed, according to which any measure which is capable of directly or indi- rectly, actually or potentially, hindering intra-Community trade constitutes a meas- ure having equivalent effect to a quantitative 17. Where those conditions are fulfilled, the application of such rules to the sale of prod- 15 — See Aragonesa de Publiádad Exterior and Laboratoire de ucts from another Member State meeting the prothèses oculaires, both cited in footnote 14. requirements laid down by that State is not 16 — See the judgments in Blesgen and in Oosthoek's Uitgevers- by nature such as to prevent their access to maatschappij, both cited in footnote 14, in Case C-23/89 Quietlynn and Richards [1990] ECR 1-3059, in the market or to impede access any more Case C-350/89 Sheptonhurst [1991] ECR 1-2387, in Case C-145/88 Torfaen Borough Council v B&Q [1989] ECR than it impedes the access of domestic prod- 3851, in Case C-332/89 Marchandise [1991] ECR 1-1027 and in Case C-169/91 B&QII [1992] E C R 1-6635. ucts. ...' 2 0 17 — Cited in footnote 8. 18 — Judgments in Hiinermund, cited in footnote 10, in Joined Cases C-401/92 and C-402/92 Tankstation t'Heukske [1994] ECR 1-2199, in Case C-69/93 Punto Casa [1994] ECR 1-2355 and in Case C-412/93 Leclerc-Siplec [1995] 19 — Cf. paragraphs 11 and 16 of the judgment. ECR 1-179. 20 — My emphasis.

I - 1627

O P I N I O N O F MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

13. The innovation therefore relates to cer- scope of the provision on sales, it is possible tain selling arrangements subject to the con- for there to be restrictions which specifically ditions referred to. What limiting criteria are affect imports. To exclude them a priori from to be applied in a specific case are not com- the scope of Article 30 seems to me to be pletely clear from the judgment itself. Con- inappropriate and also certainly not to have sequently, both in the literature and in Opin- been intended by the judgment in Keck and ions of Advocate General Van Gerven 21 and Mithouard 25 on the face of paragraph 17. Advocate General Jacobs 22 views have been expressed as to any possible limitations. 23

14. A preliminary consideration is appropri- ate in order to resolve the specific case 16. What is decisive, therefore, is how 'cer- before the Court: it must be assumed that tain' selling arrangements within the mean- Article 30 goes beyond a mere prohibition of ing of that judgment can be defined or what discrimination. Otherwise, all sorts of sales conditions are not covered thereby and national measures would be conceivable to which the classical test for measures hav- which — albeit applicable without distinc- ing equivalent effect to quantitative restric- tion — might be likely to impede the access tions apply. To my mind, when choosing to the market of products from other Mem- from among the conceivable approaches that ber States. The aim of Article 30 continues to solution should be selected which is most be to prohibit such measures in order to readily to be harmonized with the require- establish and maintain an internal market. ments of the free movement of goods and the former case-law.

15. Preventing or, in any event, impeding access to the market is also conceivable through the imposition of particular sales conditions. 2 4 Depending on the type and 17. Among the attempts to effect a theoreti- cal grasp of the judgment in Keck and Mith- 21 — Opinion of Advocate General Van Gerven of 16 March ouard, it has been argued that the case-law 1994 in Joined Cases C-401/92 and C-402/92 Tankstation 't might be construed as the introduction of a Heukske, cited in footnote 18, at 1-2201. 22 — Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs of 24 November de minimis rule. 26 Others interpret the case- 1994 in Leclerc-Siplec, cited in footnote 18. 23 — The ground had previously been prepared by the Opinion of Advocate General Tesauro of 27 October 1993 in Hiiner- mund, cited in footnote 10. 24 — Cf. Delattre, cited in footnote 5, Monteil and Samanni, 25 — Cited in footnote 8. cited in footnote 6, and Clinique Laboratoires, cited in 26 — Cf. the Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Leclerc- footnote 14. Siplec, cited in footnote 18, section 45.

I - 1628

COMMISSION v GREECE

law as a rule relating to the burden of selling arrangement, but it is capable of guid- proof. 27 ing and channelling sales. 30 This compulso- rily excludes other sales channels, which is certainly capable of adversely affecting imports. Since the use in certain circum- stances of proven distribution systems 31 is forbidden, this makes product marketing more onerous and more expensive, 32 which has a direct effect on imports. The develop- 18. Apan from the fact that in its earlier ment of new manners of marketing may in case-law the Court rejected the introduction these circumstances prove more difficult for of a requirement for the measures in ques- foreign manufacturers than for domestic tion to have an appreciable effect 2S and there ones, who are familiar with conditions on is no support for a rule on the burden of the home market. Rules governing the mar- proof in that case-law either, 29 a concrete keting of a product or a group of products way of considering the particular measure at generally are more intensive in their effects issue is afforded by those two approaches than rules governing general conditions of jointly and by the judgment in Keck and sale. 33 Mithouard. What should be determinative is the hindrance to the access to the market of imported goods.

II — The pharmacists' monopoly as a meas- ure having equivalent effect 20. Whether import volumes for a class of product differ in absolute terms before and after the introduction of such a measure can- not be decisive in determining whether the measure is to be classed as a measure having equivalent effect, since actual import vol- umes are also apt to be influenced by sub- 19. The introduction of the pharmacists' stantially different factors, which in turn are sales monopoly for infant formulae should affected by the characteristics of the product. be subjected to a 'preliminary examination' In addition, failure of imports to increase, as against this background. Admittedly, a sales monopoly effectuated by a State measure is a 30 — Cf. to this effect Delattre, cited in footnote 5, and Montea and Samanni, cited in footnote 6. 31 — The measure at issue was not introduced until 1988. 27 — Cf. the Opinion of Advocate General Van Gerven in Tank- 32 — The parties agree that pharmacists' profit margin is up to station 'i Heukske, cited in footnote 18, footnote 53. 15% whilst, according to a submission made by the Com- 28 — Judgments in Case 16/83 Prantl [1984] ECR 1299, para- mission at the hearing, that of supermarkets is up to 7%. graph 20, and in Case C-126/91 Yves Rocher [1993] ECR 33 — As, for instance, in the Sunday trading and Sunday employ- 1-2361, paragraph 21. ment cases: judgments in Torfaen Borough Council v B&Q, 29 — As a result of the broad definition of measures having in Marchandise and in B&QÎ1, all cited in footnote 16, and equivalent effect, there is no need for proof of the restric- in Case C-306/88 Rochdale Borough Council [1992] ECR tive effect of a measure; conversely, it could not avail a 1-6457, in Case 312/89 Conforama [1991] ECR 1-997 and in Member State to argue and possibly to prove that the meas- Case C-304/90 Reading Borough Council [1992] ECR ure in question does not in fact impede imports of goods. 1-6493.

I -1629

OPINION OF MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

would otherwise have been possible, would 23. Furthermore, in the instant case there are also constitute a restriction. particular circumstances which alone suggest that the arrangement in question constitutes a measuring having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports. In Greece no domestic production of infant for- mulae takes place. The Commission asserted this claim and it was confirmed by the Greek Government in response to a question. There are apparently fourteen competing products 21. In my view, the actual introduction of on the market, coming from other Member the sales monopoly is in itself capable of States of the Community. Consequently, it is impeding imports and hence it should be not possible to make a genuine comparison assumed that Article 30 is applicable. The of the restriction of access to the market for establishment of monopolies at the market- domestic and imported products. Accord- ing level seems, even according to the ingly, any increased difficulty resulting from Court's estimation after the judgment in the measure at issue as regards marketing Keck and Mithouard, to be a measure having possibilities specifically affects imported equivalent effect within the meaning of Arti- products. cle 30. In the judgments in Ligur Carni34 and La Crespelle, 35 which were concerned with exclusive rights of certain bodies at the marketing stage, 36 the Court considered Articles 30 and 36 without having recourse solely to the Keck and Mithouard case-law. 24. Whilst in the judgment in Keck and Mithouard there is a criterion for excluding 'certain' selling arrangements from the scope of Article 30 which is worded as follows, 'provided that [the sales arrangements] affect in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and of those from other Member States', the converse conclusion can be inferred in this case that 22. According to the Court's case-law both since in fact only the marketing of products before and after the judgment in Keck and from other Member States is affected, the Mithouard, a pharmacists' monopoly must measure must be categorized as a measure therefore be categorized as a measure having having equivalent effect. equivalent effect.

34 — Judgment in Joined Cases C-227/91, C-318/91 and C-319/91 Ligur Carni [1993] ECR 1-6621. 35 — Judgment in Case C-323/93 La Crespelle [1994] ECR 1-5077. 25. For those reasons, there is, to my mind, 36 — In Ligur Carni the proceedings were concerned with national legislation under which products (fresh meat) were no doubt that the monopoly arrangement subjected in transit and on arrival in the municipality of destination to systematic veterinary and health inspections should be assessed as being a measure having for which a fee had to be paid. The La Crespelle case was equivalent effect within the meaning of Arti- concerned with exclusive rights of insemination centres to operate in a particular area. cle 30 of the Treaty.

I - 1630

COMMISSION v GREECE

III — Justification of the measure argues that labelling alone provides insuffi- cient consumer information about infant for- mulae, that is to say, both from the point of view of the composition of the product and its preparation for use. 26. The Greek Government puts forward a series of arguments designed to justify the measure, which have to be tested in the clas- sical manner.

29. The composition of infant formulae is bindingly governed at Community level b y 27. In the first place, there is the fact that Directive 91/321. The extent to which ingre- there is a piece of Community legislation dients must be mentioned and the manner in concerned with infant formulae and it relates which this must take place under the pre- only to their composition, presentation and scribed labelling requirements is governed by labelling, namely Directive 91/321/EEC. 37 3S Directive 91/321 in conjunction with Direc- As far as marketing channels are concerned, tive 79/112/EEC. 4° The compulsory label- there is no Community legislation, with the ling accordingly provides information about result that the Member States continue to be product composition. competent to legislate in this field and to rely, where appropriate, on Article 36 of the Treaty.

30. The Greek Government argues that the 1. Imperative requirements reding to con- low level of education of a large proportion sumer protection of women of childbearing age precludes ref- erence to the labelling. Manifestly, the Greek Government is assuming that a substantial number of the women in question are not capable of reading the words on the package. 28. In order to justify the selling arrange- Following the dispute between the Greek ment, the Greek Government relies on con- Government and the Commission as to how sumer protection, which is to be taken into many such women are illiterate, it will be account as an imperative requirement. 39 It assumed that a small proportion amounting to about 2 % of the women potentially affected are illiterate. The question now is whether that circumstance constitutes a 37 — Commission Directive 91/321/EEC of 14 May 1991 on infant formulae and follow-on formulae, OJ 1991 L 175, p. 35. 38 — Article 1 of the directive refers to the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes, whose aims and prin- 40 — Council Directive 79/112/EEC of 18 December 1978 on the ciples — dealing with marketing, information and responsi- approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to bilities of health authorities — are to be given effect by the the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for Member States. sale to the ultimate consumer, OJ 1979 L 33, p. 1, as 39 — Cf. the Cassis de Dijon judgment, cited in footnote 12, amended by Council Directive 89/395/EEC of 14 June paragraph 8. 1989, OJ 1989 L 186, p. 17.

I-1631

O P I N I O N O F MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

danger which requires and justifies a special may, however, have graphic representations selling arrangement. ... for illustrating methods of preparation', a possibility which is made use of in practice.

31. It may be assumed that there are no dan- 33. I therefore consider that, even if it must gers inherent in the product itself, since be assumed that there is a small percentage infant formulae may in any case be marketed of women who cannot read or write, in the Community only if they comply with recourse by such persons to infant formulae the provisions of Directive 91/321. 41 It is which are freely obtainable on sale does not therefore not absolutely necessary to read constitute a particular danger. and check the substances making up the product in order to administer it safely. Moreover, a potential purchaser is quite free to seek advice at any time from a person she trusts, namely one of her relations or acquaintances, or consult her doctor or phar- macist. 34. Furthermore, it appears to me to be far from reality to assume that a mother of all people should administer something impru- dently to her child, thus endangering her infant, since it can generally be assumed that it will be the mother who will primarily see to the well-being of her child.

32. As regards the preparation of infant for- mulae for use, in principle the situation can be no otherwise. Article 4(3) of Directive 91/321 provides that 'In order to make infant formulae and follow-on formulae ready for 35. In Community law, consumer protection use, nothing more shall be required, as the is largely taken into account by provisions case may be, than the addition of water'. on labelling. Both the Community legislator However, heed should be paid to the quan- and the Court of Justice regard this as an tity of the product to be used and the fact adequate safeguard. In the instant case, there that the water should have been boiled. Sym- are in my view no discernible grounds for bols and drawings may be employed in order deviating from that rule. to put over the information necessary to that effect. The second sentence of Article 7(5) of the directive states that '[Infant formulae]

41 — The second sentence of Article 2 of the directive provides as follows: ' N o product other than infant formula mav be 36. Consequendy, consumer protection as marketed or otherwise represented as suitable for satisfying by itself the nutritional requirements of normal healthy an imperative requirement does not justify infants during the first four to six months of life'. the restrictive selling arrangement.

I - 1632

COMMISSION v GREECE

2. Protection of health and life of humans 39. With regard to the alleged requirement for a doctor's prescription, the Commission vigorously contested that this could be inferred from the Greek legislation. In answer to an express question put at the hearing, the representative of the Greek Government essentially stated that, since the products are subject to monopoly sale b y pharmacists, there is inevitably a requirement 37. The Greek Government puts forward for a prescription. I am not convinced b y several grounds, all of which may be sub- that answer. In the final analysis, there is n o sumed under the general heading of health need to decide in these proceedings on the protection. 'Protection of health' is one of alleged requirement for a prescription; never- the justificatory grounds set out in Article theless, this circumstance is relevant as 36, which the Member States may invoke at regards the Greek Government's classifica- any time in areas not governed by Commu- tion of the product. nity law. The arguments raised by the Greek Government must therefore be considered, not in the context of the imperative require- ments evolved by the Court, but under the heading of one of the public interest grounds set out in Article 36, which may be operative also in the event that a measure restricts imports. 42

(a) Infant formula as a medianal product

40. In this connection, the Greek Govern- ment also stated that infant formula is sub- ject to the licensing procedure for medicinal products. That factual claim was confirmed by the Commission, which inferred the licensing requirement from Article 3 of the ministerial decree at issue. In my view, this 38. The Greek Government takes the view might constitute a measure having equivalent that infant formula has the characteristics of effect contrary to Article 30, since it amounts a medicinal product and that accordingly the to a product-related restriction of market sale of infant formulae has been required to access and, as a result of Directive 91/321, be on doctor's prescription and only from the composition and presentation of infant pharmacists. formulae as requirements for market access are governed exclusively by Community law. However, there is no need to assess the licensing procedure as it is not the subject of 42 — Cf. Aragonesa de Publicidad Extenor, cited in footnote 14, paragraph 13. these proceedings.

I - 1633

O P I N I O N OF MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

41. In contrast, the Greek Government's 2. Medicinal products claim that infant formula has the characteris- tics of a medicinal product requires further examination. If the product were lawfully categorized as a medicinal product, the legis- lative decision to restrict its sale to pharma- cies would in principle be justified, until Any substance or combination of substances such time as proof was given to the con- presented for treating or preventing disease trary. 43 in human beings or animals;

Any substance or combination of substances which may be administered to human beings 42. The expression 'medicinal product' is or animals with a view to making a medical defined at Community level by Directive diagnosis or to restoring, correcting or modi- 65/65/EEC. 44 Article 1 of that directive pro- fying physiological f unctions in human beings vides as follows: or in animals is likewise considered a medic- inal product'. 45

The Court has been called upon on many 'For the purposes of this Directive, the fol- occasions to interpret this definition. 46 It has lowing shall have the meanings hereby repeatedly been a question of the demarca- assigned to them: tion line between medicinal products and cosmetics against the background of more difficult conditions of market access for medicinal products. The Court has held that a product, even when by virtue of its charac- teristics it may be subsumed under the Com- munity definition of cosmetics, may never- theless be regarded as a medicinal product. 47 Comparable case-law exists with regard to the demarcation between medicinal products 43 — Cf. the judgments in Defattre, cited in footnote 5, para- graph 56, and in Monteil and Samanni, cited in footnote 6, paragraph 43. Cf. also Council Directive 85/432/EEC of 16 December 1985 concerning the coordination of provi- sions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action 45 — My emphasis. in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 46 — Judgments in Case C-227/82 Van Bennekom [1983] ECR 1985 L 253, p. 34). According to the first recital in the pre- 3883, in Case 35/85 Thsier [1986] 1207; cf. judgments in amble to that directive, the creation of a monopoly for Delattre, cited in footnote 5, and in Monteil and Samanni, pharmacists continues to be a matter for the Member States cited in footnote 6; judgments in Case C-l12/89 Upjohn alone. [1991] ECR 1-1703, in Case C-290/90 Commission v Ger- 44 — Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the many [1992] ECR 1-3317 and in Case C-219/91 Ter Voort approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation [1992] ECR 1-5485. or administrative action relating to medicinal products (OJ, 47 — See the judgments in Delattre, cited in footnote 5, in Mon- English Special Edition 1965-1966, p. 20), as amended by teil and Samanni, cited in footnote 6, in Upjohn, cited in Council Directive 89/341/EEC of 3 May 1989 (OJ 1989 L footnote 46, and in Case 295/90 Parliament v Council 142, p. 11). [1992] ECR 1-4193.

I - 1634

COMMISSION v GREECE

and foodstuffs. 48 According to that case-law process, are clearly distinguishable from the Member States have a relatively wide dis- foodstuffs for normal consumption, which cretion to categorize particular products as are suitable for their claimed nutritional pur- medicinal products. poses and which are marketed in such a way as to indicate such suitability.

43. Nevertheless, in my view, the defendant Member State is precluded in this case in the light of Community legislation from classing infant formulae as medicinal products. (b) A particular nutritional use must fulfil Directive 91/321 on infant formulae and the particular nutritional requirements: follow-on formulae, which I have repeatedly cited, is based on Directive 89/398/EEC, 49 a directive approximating national legislation on foodstuffs intended for particular nutri- tional uses. (i) ...

Article 1 of that directive reads as follows: (")

' 1 . This Directive concerns foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses. (iii) of infants or young children in good health.'5°

2. (a) Foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses are foodstuffs which, owing to their Point 1 of Annex I to the directive, entitled special composition or manufacturing 'Groups of foods for particular nutritional uses for which specific provisions will be laid down by specific Directives', reads 'Infant 48 — Cf. the judgments in DeUttre, cited in paragraph 5, and in formulae'. Ter Voort, cited in footnote 46. 49 — Council Directive 89/398/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses, OJ 1989 L 186, p. 27. 50 — My emphasis.

I - 1635

O P I N I O N OF M R LENZ — CASE C-391/92

44. The first recital in the preamble to Greek legislator itself assumed that arrange- Directive 91/321 reads as follows: ments were being adopted for the sale of foodstuffs for healthy infants.

'Whereas the essential composition of the products in question must satisfy the nutri- tional requirements of infants in good health 45. Moreover, since the focus is expressly on as established by generally accepted scientific healthy infants, the characteristics required data.' 5 1 to comply with the definition of medicinal products set out in Directive 65/65 are not present. Product characteristics going beyond the effects that any healthy nutrition has in warding off human illnesses cannot be attributed to the product by mere presenta- tion. 53 Restoring, correcting or modifying Article 1(1) provides as follows: physiological functions assumes in the first place that those functions deviate from the norm and this cannot be assumed in the case of healthy infants. 54

'This Directive is a specific Directive within the meaning of Article 4 of Directive 89/398/EEC and lays down compositional and labelling requirements for infant formu- lae and follow-on formulae intended for use by infants in good health in the Communi- 46. Whilst, as a result, infant formulae are ty'. 52 not to be categorized as medicinal products, it still has to be considered whether protec- tion of public health warrants the contested arrangements and whether that aim cannot be achieved by means less restrictive of intra- Community trade. 55

I consider that, in view of this binding defi- nition laid down by Community law, a 53 — Cf. medicinal products by virtue of their presentation Member State is left with no leeway to sub- within the meaning of the first alternative set out in Article ject the foodstuff in question to the special 1(2) of Directive 65/65. 54 — Cf. Medicinal products by virtue of their characteristics rules for medicinal products. Moreover, in pursuant to the second alternative set out in Article 1(2) of Article 1 of the ministerial decree at issue the Directive 65/65. 55 — Cf. judgments in Case 104/95 De Peijper [1976] ECR 613, paragraph 32, in Case 247/81 Commission v Germany [1984] ECR 1111, paragraph 7, in Case 87/85 Cophalux [1986] ECR 1707, paragraph 19, in Delattre (cited in foot- note 5), paragraph 67, in Monteil and Samanni (cited in 51 — M y emphasis. footnote 6), paragraph 46, and in Case C-373/92 Commis- 52 — M y emphasis. sion v Belgium [1993] E C R 1-3017, paragraphs 8 and 10.

I - 1636

COMMISSION v GREECE

(b) Low birth rate and infant mortality of bottle feed. In case the foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses might affect public health, the Scientific Committee for Food had to be consulted prior to the adop- tion of the directive on infant formulae and follow-on formulae in accordance with Arti- cle 4 of Directive 89/398. 56

47. The Greek Government submits that the low birth rate and relatively high rate of infant mortality necessitated radical steps. As far as the low birth rate is concerned, my view is that selling arrangements are in no way apt to influence the birth rate one way or the other. This finding seems so obvious to me as to require no further argument to back it up.

49. The Greek Government also submitted with regard to infant mortality that it sought to promote breast feeding. The promotion 48. The situation is different with regard to and protection of breast feeding is a recog- infant mortality. Admittedly, the Commis- nized aim of the Community, as Directive sion has sought to undermine the Greek 91/321 makes clear. Both the preamble and Government's premise — that infant mortal- the operative part of the directive contain ity is high in Greece by Community stan- several references to that aim. This drive is dards — by referring to statistics for other based on the current state of medical science, Member States. I take the view that matters according to which breast feeding is superior do not turn in this case on whether the rate in some respects with regard to babies' of infant mortality in Greece is in the first, health to bottle-feeding, a view which is second or third rank in comparison with being propagated by the World Health other Member States. Combating infant mor- Organization. For instance, new born babies tality is an aim of public interest in its own do not yet possess an immune system of right and justifies the taking of appropriate their own and derive their resources in that measures to reduce it. The only question is respect from their mother's milk, as a result how the pharmacists' monopoly is capable of of which — statistically — breast-fed infants affecting infant mortality. The Greek Gov- are less prone to illness. In contrast, the pur- ernment does not contend that infant formu- lae present dangers for the life of infants on account of their composition. Indeed, it would be precluded from invoking such dan- 56 — It appears from the twelfth recital in the preamble to Direc- tive 91/321 that the Scientific Committee for Food was in gers on account of the Community rules fact consulted. As regards the duty to consult scientific committees, see, inter alia, the judgment in Case governing the composition and presentation C-212/91 Angelopbarm [1994] ECR 1-171.

I-1637

OPINION OF MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

ported advantages of breast feeding for the which to situate the submission of the Greek child's physical and mental development are Government, which complains of a reduc- less quantifiable. The aim of promoting tion of breast feeding on account of socio- breast feeding in the interests of infants' economic factors. Objectively, it is more or health appears therefore to be in the interests less impossible for a working woman who of public health. has no time or place to be together with her child — even if she is in favour of breast feeding — exclusively to breast feed him for four to five months as doctors recommend. Against this background, it is imperative that supplies of a substitute product should be available to the population everywhere in the country in the interests of public health. The 50. Assuming that breast feeding is benefi- Greek Government also seems to have seen cial to infants' health, it is necessary to clar- matters in this light when it laid down the ify whether the measure at issue is appropri- derogation from the pharmacists' monopoly ate in order to promote this aim. The by which in municipalities without a phar- promotional effect could be at most an indi- macy infant formulae may also be sold in rect one in so far as it makes bottle-feed retail shops, which are to set up a special more difficult to purchase. When questioned counter and are subject to certain public at the hearing, the representative of the health provisions. Greek Government stated in effect that the promotion of breast feeding was not the main aim of the measure, but a welcome side-effect. Consequently, I consider it essen- tial to consider what factors are liable to influence a woman's decision on how to feed her baby. The prime factors are certainly the physical possibilities of a woman and a mother and the law can have no effect on them. This is true both of the ability t o breast feed and of the extent to which the baby can be breast fed.

52. The question therefore arises as to whether restricting the sale of infant formu- lae to pharmacies is appropriate to achieve the desired side effect of promoting breast feeding. This is more than doubtful. The Greek Government stated at the hearing that 51. Other factors are of a social kind, such breast feeding has been declining in Greece as the burden on the woman and the mother in recent years. It said that this is attributable in her societal context as a result of her fam- to the social and economic conditions pre- ily and career obligations. In my estimation, vailing at the present time. Increasing num- such factors play quite a significant part in a bers of women in Greece are working and mother's decision whether to breast feed and hence have less time to occupy themselves whether to continue to breast feed for the with their children, especially in their early time being. This is probably the context in months.

I - 1638

COMMISSION v GREECE

53. In order to influence breast feeding pos- 55. The view that monopolizing sales at itively in such a context, it is necessary to pharmacies is not capable of promoting create the contextual conditions which will breast feeding is also supported by the Greek provide even a working woman with the Government's statement that consumption freedom to decide to breast feed her child. of infant formula has remained constant, even following the introduction of the phar- macists' monopoly in 1988. However, if the pharmacists' monopoly is incapable of hav- ing a positive influence on a mother's decision whether or not to breast feed, it cannot produce a reduction in infant mortal- ity and there is no justification for the restriction of the free movement of goods.

54. It is not for the Court to make proposals as to which societal measures are appropriate to persuade mothers where appropriate to breast feed, creating the contextual condi- tions is a matter of policy. To my mind, to restrict the sale of infant formulae to phar- macies is in principle not capable of having a positive influence on mothers' decision whether or not to breast feed. A mother who, for whatsoever reason, cannot breast 56. In the course of arguing that the measure feed will manage to procure the food essen- was in the public interest, the Greek Gov- tial for her child's survival no matter how ernment referred to the possibility of the hard it is made for her. Consequently, from product's spoiling and to the ensuing dan- the purchaser's point of view, the pharma- gers to infants' health. In this connection, it cists' monopoly can only make buying more should be observed that in theory there is difficult and products more expensive. 57 always a possibility of foodstuffs' becoming Although breast and bottle are alternative spoilt. In order to minimize this danger, methods for feeding infants, they are not there is a duty imposed by Community law substitutes in the sense that where infant for- to indicate the date of minimum durability mula is more difficult to obtain, this results on the product. 5 8 It requires no special in more widespread recourse to the natural knowledge to be expected of a pharmacist to method of feeding. In principle, a mother's check whether the sell-by date has been decision as to how to feed her child is deter- exceeded. A minimum of attention can be mined by other factors, including the socio- expected to be paid to checking the sell-by economic ones to which I have already date also in every retail shop or supermarket. referred. Apart from this, it is to be expected that the mother will take heed of the sell-by date,

57 — Whilst, from the manufacturers' and importers' viewpoint, it is liable to make selling the product more difficult and more expensive. 58 — See Article 3(1)(4) of Directive 79/112.

I-1639

OPINION OF MR LENZ — CASE C-391/92

since after all she is buying food for her 59. In my view, it can be assumed that a child. To my mind, checking the sell-by date product recall will be necessary only in rare is sufficient to counter the sale of spoiled exceptional cases. For instance, the Greek infant formula and guarantees this as far as is Government was incapable of naming a sin- humanly possible. gle instance in which such an action had taken place in Greece, but had to refer to an instance in which a product had to be recalled on the Belgian and Luxembourg markets. 59 I consider that by using the pos- sibilities afforded by modern telecommuni- cations in such extremely rare instances a recall action could also be carried out reli- ably in the event that infant formula was also allowed to be sold otherwise than by phar- macists. The sales channels can be traced and 57. Moreover, it may be assumed that infant the necessary information communicated. formula is particularly carefully prepared Even if such a recall action should prove and packaged, as a result inter alia of Direc- more expensive than one conducted using tive 91/321. The Greek Government's argu- the pharmacists' infrastructure, it would in ment seems to be based to some extent on any event be a more moderate means than the false premise that the pharmacist can establishing a pharmacists' monopoly. check the content of each packet of infant formula which he sells. As a rule, infant for- mula consists of powder which is sold in sealed packages. The pharmacist would have to open the packet in order to carry out analyses of any kind whatsoever on the con- tents. I therefore take the view that the phar- macists' monopoly affords no greater secu- rity against the consumption of spoiled products than allowing the product to be sold in retail shops. 3. Comparable arrangements in other Mem- ber States

60. Lastly, the Greek Government asserts 58. Lastly, the Greek Government argues that administrative rules comparable to the that in the event of products' being recalled Greek pharmacists' monopoly for infant for- only pharmacists afford a guarantee that such mula exist in other Member States. The an action will be carried out swiftly and Commission denies this and confirms the surely. Only they, it is maintained, possess an infrastructure capable of guaranteeing a rapid, reliable and widespread reaction. 59 — See the defence, p. 14.

I - 1640

COMMISSION v GREECE

existence of statutory selling arrangements Article 30 of the EC Treaty. The Greek Gov- only in Spain. Voluntary agreements between ernment's reference to practice in other manufacturers and distributors are not, in its Member States consequently does not view, comparable. involve any factors capable of providing additional justification for its action. In the result, I consider that the pharmacists' monopoly in respect of infant formulae is contrary to Article 30 of the Treaty. 61. In principle, the legal view in other Member States gives reason for checking the arguments again for validity. However, no grounds for the statutory arrangements apparently existing in Spain have been Costs adduced which in substantive terms go beyond the justificatory grounds which have already been considered. In so far as arrange- ments relating to sales channels exist which came into being on the initiative of and pur- According to Article 69(2) of the Rules of suant to agreements between the economic Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be agents concerned, they are not caught by ordered to pay the costs.

C — Conclusion

62. In view of the foregoing considerations, I p r o p o s e that the C o u r t s h o u l d rule as follows:

(1) T h e Hellenic R e p u b l i c has failed t o fulfil its obligations u n d e r Article 30 of t h e E C Treaty b y p r o v i d i n g in Article 10 of Ministerial D e c r e e N o A 2/oik. 361 of 29 J a n u a r y 1988 that processed milk for infants m a y be sold o n l y b y p h a r m a - cies.

(2) T h e Hellenic R e p u b l i c is o r d e r e d t o p a y the costs.

I - 1641

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Navrhy_ga C-391/92 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik