C-106/94
ECLI:EU:C:1995:75
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61994CC0106
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
OPINION OF MR ELMER — JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL ELMER delivered on 16 March 1995 *
Introduction lation (EEC) N o 1714/88, 2 establishes rules for the grant of aid to undertakings which use sugar in the manufacture of certain chemical products, inter alia 'pharmaceutical products' as dealt with in Chapter 30 of the Common Customs Tariff.
1. Are throat pastilles with the brand names 'Pulmoll' and 'Valda' and mixtures with the brand names 'Sangart-mixture' and 'Quinto- nine' 'pharmaceutical products' as referred to in Chapter 30 of the Common Customs Tariff?
From 1987 to 1990 through its director, Patrick Colin, Distrithera SARL received FF 2 371 976.78 in sugar refunds under the said regulations by declaring red and green Pulmoll pastilles, Sangart-mixture and That is the question which the Court has Quintonine as pharmaceutical products. been asked to decide in this case. Over the same period, through its director, Daniel Dupré, Laboratoires Valda SA received FF 1 728 760 in sugar refunds by declaring Valda pastilles, manufactured from a base of gelatine and gum arabic, as pharmaceutical products. Facts
2. Council Regulation (EEC) N o 1010/86 of 25 March 1986 laying down general rules for the production refund on certain sugar prod- The Administration des Douanes et Droits ucts used in the chemical industry, 1 as Indirects did not, however, accept that they amended by Article 9 of Commission Regu- were pharmaceutical products and instead found that the pastilles fell under Common
* Original language: Danish. 1 — OJ 1986 L 94, p. 9. 2 — OJ 1988 L 152, p. 23.
I - 4762
COLIN AND DUPRÉ
Customs Tariff Chapter 17 ('Sugar and sugar guaiacol (1.6 mg per g) and terpineol (1.6 mg confectionery') and the mixtures under per g). Common Customs Tariff Chapter 22 ('Bev- erages, spirits and vinegar') and demanded repayment of the refunds granted; they also brought criminal proceedings against the two companies' directors.
Every bottle of Sangart mixture is made up, according to the evidence, of distilled water (100 cm 3 ), syrup (25 cm 3 ) and 90° alcohol (16 cm 3 ) to which is added 0.005 g sodium arsenate, 0.02 g sodium nucleinate, 1 g nux vomica, 1.5 g calf liver extract and various 3. As far as the composition of the throat flavourings. pastilles is concerned, it was explained to the Court that red Pulmoll pastilles consist essentially of sugar, terpene (3.8 mg), men- thol (0.76 mg), amylocaine hydrochloride (0.152 mg), glycirrhizin (7.6 mg) and a bind- ing agent, flavouring and colouring.
100 g of Quintonine mixture contains, besides water, 96° alcohol and sugar, certain bitter and flavouring substances (cinnamon, cola, bitter orange, quinine), 0.033 g nux vomica and 0.068 g calcium glycerophos- phate.
Green Pulmoll pastilles also consist essen- tially of sugar with menthol (1.52 mg), pep- permint essence (0.19 mg), eucalyptus oil (0.76 mg) and a binding agent, flavouring and colouring. The questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Valda pastilles consist essentially of sugar 4. In the criminal proceedings pending and gelatine or gum arabic, to which is added before the courts which made the references menthol (3.28 mg per g), eucalyptol doubt has arisen with regard to the interpre- (0.451 mg per g), and thymol (1.6 mg per g), tation of the Common Customs Tariff.
I - 4763
OPINION OF MR ELMER — JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
In Case C-106/94 (Patrick Colin), the Cour Common Customs Tariff ("Pharmaceu- d'Appel, Bourges, referred the following tical products")?' questions to the Court:
'— Having regard to their composition, presentation and use, do red Pulmoll pastilles fall within the scope of Com- In Case C-139/94 (Daniel Dupré), the Tribu- mission Regulation (EEC) N o 717/85 of nal de Grande Instance, Paris, referred the 19 March 1985 on the classification of following questions to the Court: goods falling within subheading 17.04 D 1 or within the scope of Chapter 30 of the Common Customs Tariff, "Pharma- ceutical products" — 30-4?
'— May Commission Regulation (EEC) — Having regard to their composition, N o 717/85 of 19 March 1985 on the presentation and use do green Pulmoll classification of goods falling within pastilles fall within the scope of Com- subheading 17.04 D I of the Common mission Regulation (EEC) N o 717/85 of Customs Tariff be interpreted as mean- 19 March 1985 on the classification of ing that it refers to goods whose com- goods falling within subheading 17.04 D position (percentage by weight) is dif- I or within the scope of Chapter 30 of ferent from that indicated in Article 1 of the Common Customs Tariff "Pharma- that regulation? ceutical products" — 30-4?
— Having regard to its composition, pre- sentation and use does Sangart mixture fall within the scope of Chapter 30 of the Common Customs Tariff ("Pharma- — If the reply to the first question is in the ceutical products")? negative, must heading 30.04 of the Customs Nomenclature which refers to medicaments be interpreted as meaning that it includes a product which con- tains not only sugar but above all flavouring agents which may also have — Having regard to its composition, pre- medicinal properties in such propor- sentation and use does Quintonine fall tions that it is used essentially for ther- within the scope of Chapter 30 of the apeutic and prophylactic purposes?'
I - 4764
COLIN AND DUPRÉ
The relevant tariff headings The Customs Cooperation Council's Notes on that position are identical to those relat- ing to the Harmonized System:
5. In both cases the facts relate to a period both before and after the introduction of the harmonized system nomenclature and the combined nomenclature ('CN'), which in 'This heading covers most of the sugar prep- 1988 replaced the Customs Cooperation arations which are marketed in a solid or Committee nomenclature. That change, semi-solid form, generally suitable for which is not reflected in a consistent way in immediate consumption and collectively the questions raised, is not of any material referred to as sweetmeats or confectionery. importance for the cases before the Court. The Explanatory Notes which, according to the Court's case-law may be an important aid to the interpretation of the scope of the various tariff headings 3 but do not have legally binding force, 4 to which reference is made below, are the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC) Explanatory Notes (as regards the Tariff and Statistical nomencla- ture) and the Harmonized System Explana- tory Notes (as regards the CN). It includes inter alia:
6. Chapter 17 of the Customs Tariff deals with 'Sugar and sugar confectionery' and ... Preparations put up as throat pastilles or heading 17.04 covers under both the Cus- cough drops, consisting essentially of sugars toms Cooperation Council Nomenclature (whether or not with other foodstuffs such and the C N 'Sugar confectionery not con- as starch or flour) and flavouring agents taining cocoa'. (including such substances as benzyl alcohol, menthol, eucalyptol and tolu balsam). H o w - ever, whenever a flavouring agent could also have medicinal properties and its proportion 3 — See, for instance, the judgment in Case 200/84 Daiber [1985] ECR 3363. in each pastille or drop is such that the 4 — See the judgment in Case C-35/93 Eisbein [1994] ECR 2655. preparation is thereby given therapeutic or
I - 4765
OPINION OF MR ELMER —JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
prophylactic uses, the pastilles or drops fall Article 1 of the regulation is worded as fol- in heading 30.03.' lows:
'Anicie 1
The Nomenclature Committee states that Cough and throat-irritation pastilles having heading 17.04 includes inter alia cough drops the following composition (percentage by made up of sugar (99% approximately) to weight): which has been added small proportions of various substances such as menthol, eucalyp- tol, aniseed, tolu, coltsfoot, marrubium, ben- — sucrose, glucose and caramel: 99,50, zoin, etc. in a wrapping showing the com- mercial name of the product, its composition, and in some cases a drawing of — camphor: 0,007, a man coughing.
— menthol: 0,207,
— eucalyptol: 0,069,
— Balsam Tolu: 0,003,
— thymol: 0,069, Commission Regulation N o 717/85 56 of 19 March 1985, which is referred to in the questions referred by both courts, describes — benzyl alcohol: 0, 138, 'cough and throat-irritation pastilles' as con- taining flavouring agents which may also have medicinal properties but, owing to the low proportions in which those agents are present, may not be regarded as medicaments shall be classified in the Common Customs pursuant to Note 1 to Chapter 30. Tariff under subheading:
5 — OJ 1985 L 78, p. 13. 6 — As the Commission points out, Regulation No 717/85 relates to the Customs Cooperation Council Nomen- clature. Identical rules under the CN were, however, intro- duced by Commission Regulation No 2723/90 of 24 Septem- 17.04 Sugar confectionery, not containing ber 1990 (OJ 1990 L 261, p. 24). cocoa.'
I - 4766
COLIN AND DUPRÉ
7. Chapter 22 of the Customs Tariff is 'Medicaments (excluding goods of heading entitled 'Beverages, spirits and vinegar'. N o 3002, 3005 or 3006) consisting of mixed Heading 22.09 of the Customs Cooperation or unmixed products for therapeutic or pro- Council Nomenclature is identical to phylactic uses, put up in measured doses or heading 22.08 of the C N and covers in forms or packings for retail sale'.
'Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80% vol; spirits, liqueurs and other spirituous bever- ages; compound alcoholic preparations of a The introductory Notes to Chapter 30 of the kind used for the manufacture of beverages'. Customs Cooperation Council Nomencla- ture state:
According to the Explanatory Notes, the heading covers:
'For the purposes of heading N o 30.03, "medicaments" means goods ... which are either:
'Spirituous beverages, sometimes referred to as food supplements, designed to maintain general health or well-being. They may, for example, be based on extracts from plants, fruit concentrates, lecithins, chemicals, etc., and contain added vitamins or iron com- (a) Products comprising two or more con- pounds.' stituents which have been mixed or com- pounded together for therapeutic or pro- phylactic uses; or
8. Chapter 30 of the Customs Tariff is headed 'Pharmaceutical products'. Heading 30.03 of the Customs Cooperation Council (b) Unmixed products suitable for such uses Nomenclature, entitled 'Medicaments put up in measured doses or in forms or (including veterinary medicaments)', corre- in packings of a kind sold by retail for sponds to C N heading 30.04, which covers therapeutic or prophylactic purposes.'
I - 4767
OPINION OF MR ELMER — JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
The Explanatory Notes of the Customs cough mixtures, Patrick Colin further Cooperation Council and the Harmonized pointed out that in the Bioforce judgment 7 System Explanatory Notes are identically the court recognized that a product should worded: be classified under heading 30.04 and not under heading 22.08 despite a significant alcohol content, because the alcohol was present purely 'to act as an adjuvant, a pre- servative and a vehicle for the active princi- ples of the said product'.
'... preparations put up as throat pastilles or cough drops, consisting essentially of sugars (whether or not with other foodstuffs such as gelatin, starch or flour) and flavouring agents (including such substances as benzyl alcohol, menthol, eucalyptol and tolu bal- sam) fall in heading 17.04 provided that 10. Daniel Dupré contends that Valda pas- whenever a flavouring agent could also have tilles are medicaments according to the medicinal properties its proportion in each French implementing legislation relating to pastille or drop is such that the preparation Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January is not thereby given therapeutic or prophy- 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid lactic uses.' down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products (OJ, English Special Edition 1965- 1966, p. 20) and moreover in his view should also be regarded as medicinal products under the Court's case-law on the subject. Under Procedure before the Court Directive 65/65/EEC '[a] ny substance or combination of substances which may be administered to human beings or animals with a view to making a medical diagnosis or to restoring, correcting or modifying physi- ological functions in human beings or in ani- mals' is considered a medicinal product. That requirement as to 'mode of operation' is sat- isfied by Valda pastilles and their sugar con- 9. Patrick Colin states that red Pulmoll pas- tent is immaterial in that respect. At the same tilles certainly only contain low doses of time Valda pastilles satisfy the requirements active substances. What is decisive, however, of the directive with regard to their 'descrip- is that those substances together have a ther- tion' as a medicinal product, since the prod- apeutic effect and therefore the pastilles uct's packaging clearly sets out the recom- should fall under Chapter 30 of the Customs mended dose and its composition, and also Tariff relating to pharmaceutical products. the product is subject to the national rules The high sugar content is irrelevant in that connection. Sugar is very frequently used as a binding agent in products classified under Chapter 30. With particular reference to 7 — Case C-177/91 [1993] ECR I-45.
I - 4768
COLIN AND DUPRÉ
on the marketing of medicinal products. With particular reference to the Sangart and Finally, Valda pastilles are composed of Quintonine mixtures, the French Govern- ingredients other than those listed for throat ment and the Commission state that these pastilles which, according to the Customs are products which, given their composition, Cooperation Council, should be classified are a 'fortifier' or tonic, and which therefore, under heading 17.04. having regard to their alcohol content, should be classified under heading 22.09 (Customs Cooperation Council Nomenclature) and 22.08 (CN) respectively. This is supported by the Explanatory Notes to the Customs Cooperation Council nomenclature, according to which the head- ing covers 'Spirituous beverages, sometimes referred to as food supplements, designed to maintain general health or well-being'. The 11. The Commission and the French Gov- products serve in fact simply to facilitate ernment take the view that both Pulmoll and digestion and counteract loss of appetite and Valda pastilles should fall under heading fatigue. According to their 'mode of opera- 17.04 since essentially they consist of sugar tion' they are not intended to prevent or and the other ingredients are present in such treat a particular illness and cannot therefore minimal doses that the therapeutic or pro- be classified as medicinal products. The phylactic effect required before a product majority of the ingredients of those products can be classified under Chapter 30 of the have no therapeutic effect, while the medici- Customs Cooperation Council or C N is not nal ingredients are either not effective with present. regard to particular illnesses or are present in too small doses to be able to have any ther- apeutic or prophylactic effect which could result in another classification.
The Commission points out, for example, Opinion that menthol, which is contained in both Valda and Pulmoll pastilles, is a flavouring which certainly can have certain medicinal properties. It is only, however, if the sub- stance is present in such quantities that it has a therapeutic or prophylactic effect that this can result in classification under Chapter 30. The percentage by weight of menthol in Valda and Pulmoll pastilles is 0.0328% and 12. The questions in Case C-106/94 must be 0.076% respectively, that is to say, even understood as a request for an interpretation lower than in the pastilles referred to in of Chapter 30 of the Common Customs tar- Regulation N o 717/85 which are classified iff and not as asking for a customs classifica- under heading 17.04. tion of particular products.
I - 4769
OPINION OF MR ELMER —JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
13. It follows from the settled case-law of Member State's legislation on trade in medic- the Court of Justice that, regard being had to inal products. That is apparent from the gen- the requirements of legal certainty, the de- eral notes to Chapter 30 in the Explanatory cisive criterion for the tariff classification of Notes to the Common Customs Tariff where goods must be sought in their objective char- it is stated that: 'The description of a product acteristics and qualities, as defined in the as a medicament in Community legislation ... headings of the Common Customs Tariff. or in the national legislation of the Member Only in that way can the unequivocal appli- States, or in any pharmacopoeia, is not the cation of the provision at issue be ensured deciding factor in so far as its classification in for both the trader concerned and the this chapter is concerned.' authorities called upon to interpret it (judg- ment in Case C-338/90 Hamlin Electronics GmbH 8).
The concept of medicinal product as laid down in Council Directive 65/65/EEC, is 14. The description of the product is not therefore different from that of the Customs decisive. As Advocate General Gulmann Tariff. That directive 'is designed to eliminate stated in his Opinion in Case C-177/91 Bio- — at least in part — obstacles to trade in force, 9 it is 'clear that the presentation of a proprietary medicinal products within the product is not in itself sufficient for it to be Community whilst at the same time attaining regarded as a medicinal product. To allow the essential objective of safeguarding public the presentation of a product in itself to be health'. 10 In order to promote trade and at decisive for its tariff classification might the same time protect public health the cause a product to be covered by a customs directive makes a relatively broad range of heading merely on grounds of a special pre- products subject to the supervision laid sentation, even though its objective proper- down in the medicinal products legislation. ties did not correspond to the criteria laid down in the relevant heading. That would conflict with the principle of legal certainty and might lead to arbitrary discrimination'.
16. In contrast, the criterion for tariff classi- fication as a medicinal product is its thera- 15. Nor, in relation to the Customs Tariff, is peutic or prophylactic application. The it decisive how a given product stands in Explanatory Notes to both heading 30.03 relation to the Community or individual in the Customs Cooperation Council
8 — [1992] ECR I-2333, at paragraphs 8 and 9. 10 — See the judgment in Case 227/82 Van Bennekom [1983] 9 — See footnote 7. ECR 3883.
I - 4770
COLIN AND DUPRÉ
Nomenclature and C N heading 30.04 are 18. In its observations, the Commission very clear on that point. " The addition of undertook a detailed review of the individual substances with a certain medicinal effect active substances in the throat pastilles does not automatically lead to classification involved in the case. That review reveals that under Chapter 30. active substances are present in such low doses that the original position — classifica- tion as sugar confectionery under heading 17.04 — should be maintained, since the principal ingredient is sugar.
17. That point of principle also underlies Commission Regulation N o 717/85 to which the questions refer. That regulation classifies certain cough and throat-irritation pastilles containing substances which in certain dos- Thus red Pulmoll pastilles contain, for ages may have medicinal properties under instance, the substance terpene and Valda heading 17.04. pastilles contain thymol. Despite the fact that those substances, according to the medical evidence available, may in certain doses have a therapeutic or prophylactic effect as a medicinal product, it must, however, be noted that they are present in such low quantities in the pastilles in question that That regulation may not, moreover, be even with the maximum daily intake of pas- regarded as stating anything more than that a tilles recommended on the packing, they. certain specific product with a certain spe- would have no effect of that sort. .12 The cific composition is covered by heading throat pastilles should therefore be classified 17.04 and it does not indicate the heading under Chapter 17, heading 17.04 'Sugar con- under which throat pastilles with a different fectionery, not containing cocoa', since no composition are to be classified. objective characteristics have been shown to indicate that they fall under any other chap- ter and tariff headings.
The first question from the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris, as to whether Regu- lation N o 717/85 refers to goods whose composition (percentage by weight) is differ- 19. The principal ingredients of Sangart- ent from that indicated in Article 1 of that mixture and Quintonine are distilled water, regulation should therefore be answered in the negative. 12 — According to Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, Lon- don, 1989, the recommended daily dose of terpene is, for example, 500-800 mg, and thymol is effective in a daily dose of 3 g. Red P u l m ó l lpastilles contain 3.8 mg terpene and 11 — See paragraph 8 above. Valda-pastilles 1.6 mg thymol.
I - 4771
OPINION OF MR ELMER — JOINED CASES C-106/94 AND C-139/94
sugar and alcohol, and both products are whose description corresponds to their intended to be drunk. Thus they should be objective properties. classified under heading 22.09 of the Cus- toms Cooperation Council Nomenclature ( C N heading 22.08) as 'Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80% vol; spirits, liqueurs and other spirituous beverages; compound alco- In its observations, the Commission under- holic preparations of a kind used for the took a detailed review of the very few active manufacture of beverages', unless objective substances in the mixtures. For example, it is characteristics are shown to indicate that stated that sodium arsenate is traditionally they should be classified under other chap- used in the treatment of anaemic conditions, ters and tariff headings. but since each bottle of Sangart mixture con- tains per 141 cm 3 only 0.005 mg of the sub- stance, any therapeutic effect must be excluded. Since therefore no objective char- acteristics have been shown for the mixtures It is expressly stated in introductory Note in question which could lead to a departure 1(a) to Chapter 30 that the Chapter does not from the original position, on the same cover '[f] oods or beverages (such as dietetic, grounds as those given for the throat pas- diabetic or fortified foods, food supplements, tilles it must be concluded that these prod- tonic beverages and mineral waters)'. Such ucts too should not be classified under products fall under other tariff headings Chapter 30.
Conclusion
I n v i e w of the foregoing I w o u l d p r o p o s e that the C o u r t reply t o the questions referred to it as follows:
— C o m m i s s i o n R e g u l a t i o n ( E E C ) N o 717/85 of 19 M a r c h 1985, as a m e n d e d b y C o m m i s s i o n R e g u l a t i o n ( E E C ) N o 2723/90 of 24 S e p t e m b e r 1990, s h o u l d be i n t e r p r e t e d as m e a n i n g that it d o e s n o t cover g o o d s w h o s e c o m p o s i t i o n (per- centage b y w e i g h t ) is o t h e r t h a n that referred t o in Article 1 of t h e Regulation.
— T h e C o m m o n C u s t o m s Tariff s h o u l d be i n t e r p r e t e d as m e a n i n g that the defi- nition of ' P h a r m a c e u t i c a l p r o d u c t s ' in C h a p t e r 30 d o e s n o t include t h r o a t p a s - tilles a n d m i x t u r e s w i t h t h e c o m p o s i t i o n of the p r o d u c t s in q u e s t i o n in this case.
I - 4772