C-154/98
ECLI:EU:C:1999:124
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 61998CO0154
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
ORDER OF 5. 3. 1999 — CASE C-154/98 P
ORDER OF THE COURT 5 March 1999 *
In Case C-154/98 P,
Guérin Automobiles EURL, a company in judicial liquidation, established at Alençon (France), acting in the person of Xavier Lemée, liquidator, represented by Jean-Claude Fourgoux, of the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Pierrot Schütz, 4 Rue Beatrix de Bourbon,
appellant,
APPEAL against the order of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Third Chamber) of 13 February 1998 in Case T-276/97 Guérin Automobiles v Commission [1998] ECR 11-261, seeking to have that order set aside,
the other party to the proceedings being:
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Giuliano Marenco, Principal Legal Adviser, and Guy Charrier, a national expert on secondment to its Legal Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, also of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,
defendant at first instance,
* Language of the case: French.
I - 1452
GUÉRIN AUTOMOBILES v COMMISSION
T H E COURT,
composed of: G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, President, P. J. G. Kapteyn, J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch, P. Jann (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, C. Gulmann, J. L. Murray, D. A. O. Edward, H . Ragnemalm, L. Sevón and M. Wathelet (Rapporteur), Judges,
Advocate General: G. Cosmas, Registrar: R. Grass,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General,
makes the following
Order
Facts and procedure
By application lodged at the Court Registry on 17 April 1998, Guérin Automobiles EURL (hereinafter 'Guérin Automobiles') brought an appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice against the order of the Court of First Instance of 13 February 1998 in Case T-276/97 Guérin Automobiles v Commission [1998] ECR11-261 ('the contested order 5 ), in which the Court dismissed as inadmis- sible its application for the annulment of Commission Decision SG(97) D/823182 of 25 April 1997 rejecting the complaint by which Guérin Automobiles challenged the standard distribution contract for Volvo cars in France and its application.
I -1453
ORDER OF 5. 3. 1999 — CASE C-154/98 P
2 Guérin Automobiles was originally a dealer, inter alia, for Volvo cars. Its dealership contract of indefinite duration with the French importer of cars of that make was terminated on 16 August 1988.
3 O n 3 August 1992, it addressed to the Commission a complaint concerning Volvo France SA under Article 3 of Regulation N o 17 of the Council of 6 February 1962, the first regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty (OJ, English Special Edition 1959-1962, p. 87). By that complaint, it challenged the distribution system implemented by the manufacturer and requested the withdrawal of the exemption under Commission Regulation (EEC) N o 123/85 of 12 December 1984 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of motor vehicle distribution and servicing agreements (OJ 1985 L 15, p . 16).
4 Guérin Automobiles was declared insolvent by judgment of the Tribunal de Com- merce (Commercial Court), Alençon, of 22 May 1995. Maître Lemée, its legal representative, was appointed as liquidator of the company.
5 By letter of 25 April 1997 the Commission definitively rejected Guérin Automo- biles' complaint.
6 By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 20 October 1997, Guérin Automobiles brought an action for the annulment of the Commis- sion's decision of 25 April 1997.
I - 1454
GUÉRIN AUTOMOBILES v COMMISSION
The contested order
7 By the contested order the Court of First Instance dismissed that action as mani- festly inadmissible on the ground that proceedings were not commenced within the period of two months laid down in the fifth paragraph of Article 173 of the EC Treaty.
s At paragraph 20 of the contested order the Court held that Community law docs not, in a case such as the one before it, require the Community institutions to inform the addressee of a measure capable of adversely affecting it of the remedies available to challenge that measure or of the time-limits and procedures for bringing an action to that end.
The appeal
9 In support of its appeal, Guérin Automobiles relies on a single plea in law, based on the general Community law principles of the protection of legitimate expecta- tions, legal certainty, respect for the rights of the defence and the right to an effec- tive judicial remedy, and on the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
io It argues that Community law, whose origins are autonomous and unconnected with national legal systems, takes time to be assimilated. It is not yet possible for all citizens to have a sufficient understanding of it. They will be unfamiliar with its terminology, its complex rules and the way in which the Community institutions work.
1 1 That is why, having regard to the general principles of Community law mentioned in paragraph 9 of the present order, it is necessary to indicate the remedies avail- able and the time-limits for availing themselves thereof in order to make the right to a judicial remedy effective.
I -1455
ORDER OF 5. 3. 1999 — CASE C-154/9S P
Findings of the C o u r t
i2 Under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, where an appeal is clearly inadmissible or clearly unfounded, the Court may at any time dismiss it by reasoned order without initiating the oral procedure.
13 Articles 189, 190, 191 and 192 of the E C Treaty, which define precisely the nature of and rules applicable to the legal measures that may be adopted by the Com- munity institutions, do not impose on those institutions any general obligation to inform the addressees of those measures of the judicial remedies available or of the time-limits for availing themselves thereof.
u It is true that in the majority of the Member States the administrative authorities are under an obligation to provide this information. However, it is generally the legislature that has created and regulated that obligation. Moreover, to impose such an obligation would require the prior identification of the administrative measures concerned, the content, form and placing, in the measure adopted or in a separate document, of the compulsory information, and the consequences flowing from the absence of the required information or the inaccuracy of the information provided.
is In the absence of express provisions of Community law, the Community admin- istration and judicature cannot be placed under a general obligation to inform indi- viduals of the remedies available or of the conditions under which they may avail themselves thereof.
ie It is therefore appropriate to declare, pursuant to Article 119 of the Rules of Pro- cedure, that the appeal is clearly unfounded.
I - 1456
GUÉRIN AUTOMOBILES v COMMISSION
Costs
i7 Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure provides that the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party's pleadings. Since the Commission has applied for an order on costs and Gućrin Automobiles has been unsuccessful in its appeal, the latter must be ordered to pay the costs.
O n those grounds,
THE COURT
hereby:
1. Dismisses t h e appeal;
2. Orders Guérin Automobiles E U R L t o pay t h e costs of t h e appeal.
Luxembourg, 5 March 1999.
R. Grass G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias
Registrar President
I - 1457