C-276/00
ECLI:EU:C:2001:437
- Súd
- Súdny dvor Európskej únie
- IČS
- 62000CC0276
- Zdroj
- eur-lex.europa.eu ↗
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL MISCHO delivered on 11 September 2001 1
1. Turbon International GmbH, formerly 2. According to Turbon, the cartridges fall Kores Nordic Deutschland ('Turbon'), is within the scope of heading 8473 'Parts and challenging before the Hessisches Finanz- accessories (other than covers, carrying gericht (Finance Court), Hessen, (the 'Fi- cases and the like) suitable for use solely nanzgericht') the decision of the German or principally with machines of heading customs authorities, represented by the Nos 8469 to 8472' of the CN, since they Oberfinanzdirektion Koblenz (the 'Oberfi- consist of a part or accessory for a printer nanzdirektion'), to classify under heading whose classification under heading 8471 is 3215 'Printing ink, writing or drawing ink unchallenged. and other inks, whether or not concen- trated or solid' of the combined nomen- clature (the 'CN') ink cartridges without integrated print head, for Epson Stylus Colour ink-jet printers. Those goods con- sist of an ink cartridge (consisting in turn of a cuboid plastic casing of approximately 3. Considering that the action raised ques- 2.7 x 6.4 x 4.2 cm, cellular material, metal tions of interpretation of Community law screen, seals, tape seal, and labels, with a and being concerned to preserve the uni- total value of approximately DEM 4), ink formity of that law, taking account, in (approximately 35 ml) valued at DEM 0.35 particular, of the existence of binding tariff and packing materials consisting of a information issued by other Member cardboard box inside which is a sealed States, the Finanzgericht decided, by order grey plastic bag. It can only be used in ink of 21 February 2000, to stay the proceed- jet printers of the abovementioned make, ings and to refer the following question to the cartridge and the ink being specially the Court of Justice for a preliminary designed for that type of printer. ruling:
'Is a compatible ink-jet cartridge, consisting of an ink cartridge (plastic casing, cellular material, metal screen, seals, tape seal, labels), ink and packing materials, where both the ink cartridge and the ink can be used solely in an Epson Stylus Colour 1 — Original language: French. printer,
I - 1391
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
— to be classified under code number and varnishes; putty and other mastics; 3215 90 80 as a disposable, ink-filled inks') of section VI is as follows: cartridge (without integrated print head) for ink-jet printers,
'3215 Printing ink, writing or drawing ink and other inks, whether or not con- centrated or solid:
or
— Printing ink:
— is that compatible ink-jet cartridge a 3215 1100 Black part or accessory of a printer that is assigned to CN heading No 8471 as an essential unit of an automatic datapro- cessing machine, and therefore covered by CN heading No 8473?' 3215 19 00 Other
3215 90 — Other:
4. In the version of the Combined Nomen- clature which was in force at the time when the dispute in the main proceedings arose, that is to say the version in Commission 3215 90 10 — Writing or drawing ink Regulation (EC) No 1734/96 of 9 Septem- ber 1996 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomen- clature and on the Common Customs 3215 90 80 Other'. Tariff, 2 heading 3215, inserted into Chapter 32 ('Tanning or dyeing extracts; tannins and their derivatives; dyes, pig- ments and other colouring matter; paints 5. Headings 8471 and 8473, inserted into Chapter 84 ('Nuclear reactors, boilers, 2 — OJ 1996 L 238, p. 1. machinery and mechanical appliances;
I - 1392
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
parts thereof') of Section XVI, are as 8473 Parts and accessories follows: (other than covers, carry- ing cases and the like) suitable for use solely or principally with machines '8471 Automatic data processing of heading Nos 8469 to m a c h i n e s and u n i t s 8472: thereof; magnetic or optical readers, machines for transcribing data onto data media in coded form and machines for process- ing such data, not else- w h e r e s p e c i f i e d or included:
8473 30 — Parts and accessories of the machines of head- ing No 8471:
8471 60 — Input or output units, whether or not con- taining storage units in 8473 30 10 — Electronic assemblies the same housing:
8471 60 10 For use in civil air- 8473 30 90 — Other'. craft
Other 6. It is plain that ink cartridges for printers are not mentioned as such under either heading 3215 or heading 8473. 8471 60 40 — — — Printers
8471 60 50 — — — Keyboards 7. In order to determine whether they should none the less be classified under those headings, the general rules for the 8471 60 90 — — — Other interpretation of the combined nomencla- ture and the explanatory notes to the harmonised system for the designation and codification of goods, drawn up by the Customs Cooperation Council, now the
I - 1393
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
World Customs Organisation, must be (b) mixtures, composite goods consisting applied. of different materials or made up of different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be classified by reference to 3(a), shall be classified as if they consisted of the material or component which gives them their essential character in so far 8. Amongst the general rules for the inter- as this criterion is applicable.' pretation of the combined nomenclature, rules 3 and 5 merit particular attention in light of the question which we are asked.
10. Under rule 5: 9. Under rule 3:
'When by application of rule 2(b) or for 'In addition to the foregoing provisions, the any other reason, goods are prima facie following rules shall apply in respect of the classifiable under two or more headings, goods referred to therein: classification shall be effected as follows:
(a) the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred (a) camera cases, musical instrument cases, to headings providing a more general gun cases, drawing-instrument cases, description. However, when two or necklace cases and similar containers, more headings each refer to part only specially shaped or fitted to contain a of the materials or substances con- specific article or set of articles, suit- tained in mixed or composite goods able for long-term use and presented or to part only of the items in a set put with the articles for which they are up for retail sale, those headings are to intended, shall be classified with such be regarded as equally specific in articles when of a kind normally sold relation to those goods, even if one of therewith. This rule does not, however, them gives a more complete or precise apply to containers which give the description of the goods; whole its essential character;
I - 1394
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
(b) subject to the provisions of rule 5 (a), the goods', and the note concerning rule packing materials and packing con- 5(a) which states that: tainers(1) presented with the goods therein shall be classified with the goods if they are of a kind normally used for packing such goods. However this provision is not binding when such packing materials or packing con- tainers are clearly suitable for repetitive 'This Rule shall be taken to cover only use.' those containers which:
(1) are specially shaped or fitted to contain a specific article or set of articles, i.e. they are designed specifically to accom- 11. Footnote (1) states: 'The terms "pack- modate the article for which they are ing materials" and "packing containers" intended. Some containers are shaped mean any external or internal containers, in the form of the article they contain; holders, wrappings or supports other than transport devices (e.g. transport con- tainers), tarpaulins, tackle or ancillary transport equipment. The term "packing containers" does not cover the containers referred to in general rule 5(a)'. (2) are suitable for long-term use, i.e. they are designed to have a durability com- parable to that of the articles for which they are intended. These containers also serve to protect the article when not in use (during the transport or storage, for example). These criteria enable them to be distinguished from simple packages; 12. In the explanatory notes to the har- monised system, a distinction is made as between notes on the general rules and notes on particular headings. The former include, first of all, the note on rule 3(b) under which 'the factor which determines essential character will vary as between (3) are presented with the articles for different kinds of goods. It may, for which they are intended, whether or example, be determined by the nature of not the articles are packed separately the material or component, its bulk, quan- for convenience of transport. Presented tity, weight or value, or by the role of a separately the containers are classified constituent material in relation to the use of in their appropriate headings;
I - 1395
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
(4) are of a kind normally sold with such (b) refills for ball-point fountain pens articles; and comprising the ball point and the reservoir (heading 96.08). On the other hand, mere ink-filled cartridges for ordinary fountain pens remain in this heading. (5) do not give the whole its essential character.'
(c) inked ribbons for typewriters or ink- 13. The notes on the general rules also pads (heading 96.12).' include a note concerning rule 5(b), accord- ing to which:
and the note concerning heading 8473 'This rule governs the classification of which states that '[t]he accessories covered packing materials and packing containers by this heading are interchangeable parts or of a kind normally used for packing the devices designed to adapt a machine for a goods to which they relate. However, this particular operation, or to perform a par- provision is not binding when such packing ticular service relative to the main function materials or packing containers are clearly of the machine, or to increase its range of suitable for repetitive use, for example, operations'. certain metal drums or containers of iron or steel for compressed or liquefied gas.'
14. In the light of the question referred to 15. In support of the classification of the the Court the note concerning heading cartridges at issue under heading 8473, 3215 is of particular relevance. Under it: Turbon has submitted a whole series of arguments before both the national court and the Court of Justice.
'This heading does not include:
16. The first relates to the features of the cartridges. These are in the form of a plastic casing specially designed for Epson Stylus
I - 1396
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
Colour printers. The casing comprises a cally adapted for the cartridge, ink and piece of cellular material which, after fill- printer in question. Turbon notes, on ing, absorbs ink in its capillary system, the that point, that the regular supply to diameter of the capillaries being specifically the print head is endangered where calculated on the basis of the cartridge and there is compensation which is too the surface tension of the ink used in order weak while compensation which is to prevent leaks and to ensure that the print too strong produces, by contrast, an head has the necessary quantity of ink in ink leak. order to print.
17. In the light of those features, the item in question cannot, according to Turbon, be — The interior of the plastic casing is deemed to be a mere container. Plainly, the fitted, upstream of the exit opening, cartridges do not only hold ink, but are with a metallic screen preventing lumps designed and fitted to ensure an optimal of ink from reaching the print head and supply of ink to the print head and are to clogging it up. accord with the characteristics of the print head, and they must therefore be deemed to form part of a printer.
— On the exterior of the plastic casing, the exit opening is provided with a seal 18. Although the cartridges do not incor- preventing any air from entering after porate a print head, they are wholly com- the ink cartridge is fitted. That device parable to cartridges which do include one prevents the ink from drying out at the and which the Customs authorities regard same time as ensuring an appropriate as printer parts. channelling of ink from the cartridge towards the print head.
19. In any event, the classification of ink cartridges supplied with a print head as printer parts negates the objection to clas- — Finally, the cover closing the back of sification of the contested cartridges as a the cartridge includes a ventilation and printer part on the ground that a liquid pressure compensation system specifi- cannot be classified as a printer part.
I-1397
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
20. However, even if that classification as a 24. On that point, Turbon seeks to rely on part of a printer had to be set aside, the judgments in ELBA, 3in which preference classification under heading 8473 still was given to the heading taking into applies since it should at least be classified account the purpose of the goods on the as an accessory to a printer. ground that it was more specific, over a heading based on the materials from which the goods were made, in Thyssen Hantel Logistic, 4in which the intended purpose was also held to be decisive, and in VOBIS Microcomputer, 5 in which the essential character was determined on the basis of the value and importance of the constituent materials for the purpose of the use of the 21. It is indeed an interchangeable part or goods. In the light of the latter judgment, device designed to adapt a machine for a the ratio of 10 to 1 between the value of the particular operation, in this case for print- casing and that of the ink contained ing, within the meaning of the explanatory excludes classification of the cartridges as note to the harmonised system concerning ink. heading 8473 of the CN.
25. The fourth argument concerns the meaning of a part of a printer. According 22. The second of Turbon's arguments to Turbon, that classification cannot be relates to the unchallenged classification reserved to parts of a printer performing of toner cartridges for photocopiers under the essential functions in the operation of the same heading as photocopiers. Accord- such a machine, that is to say in the ing to Turbon, the ink cartridges in ques- printing process, since, on that argument, tion play exactly the same role in a printer classification as printer parts would be as toner cartridges in a photocopier. refused to numerous parts of it, for example, to its cover, which are in no way necessary to the actual printing pro- cess.
23. The third argument is that, even if the cartridges in question may, prima facie, just 26. Those arguments advanced by Turbon as readily be classified under heading 3215 in favour of the classification under head- as under heading 8473, general rule 3(a) on the interpretation of the CN, which requires preference to be given to the more 3 — Case 205/80 [1981] ECR 2097. specific heading, requires classification 4 — Case C-4J9/93 [1995] ECR I-1381. under heading 8473. 5 — Case C-121/95 [1996] ECR I-3047.
I - 1398
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
ing 8473 of the cartridges found a certain the casing is clearly not a container of the favour with the national court, which took type generally used for storing printing ink. note of a series of factors which in its view were likely to preclude the plastic casing in the form in which the cartridge is presented from being deemed to be a mere container for ink.
31. In addition, the Finanzgericht does not view the fact that the ink stored in the cartridge is consumed as a barrier to classification as a printer part, since the cartridge, taken as a whole, is used rather 27. Firstly, the national court notes that the than consumed in the printing process. cartridge is not specially shaped to hold ink but, rather, to be fitted in the printer for which it was designed.
32. The national court notes that a car- tridge has a period of use less than that of a 28. Secondly, it notes that the cartridges in printer, even where it is refilled, but the question are refillable. same goes for other parts of such a machine.
29. Thirdly, it finds that the container, namely the casing, and its content, namely 33. The Oberfinanzdirektion challenges the ink, are not separable in the light of the those arguments, in addition to a circular function assigned to the cartridge. by the Germans Customs authorities, by three arguments in support of classification under heading 3215. First of all, it argues that the product to be classified is the ink contained in the cartridge. The ink is a product indispensable to the operation of the printer rather than the cartridge itself, 30. It therefore appears to the national which is only a necessary container in the court that the classification of the plastic case of a liquid product. It goes on to stress casing as a mere container is not in that since a liquid product is involved and accordance either with general rule 5(a), the printer is complete even without the ink to the extent that it is specifically the casing cartridge the contested cartridges cannot which determines the essential character of readily be deemed to constitute printer the whole, or with general rule 5(b), since parts.
I - 1399
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
34. Only those products which are necess- operation of which the part is essential', ary for the assembly of a machine or are and that is not so in the present case, since obtained on dismantling it can be desig- the Epson Stylus Colour printer can operate nated as parts of machines under Note 2(b) perfectly both from the mechanical and to Section XVI of the CN. The Oberfi- electronic points of view, without the nanzdirektion contends that the item con- contested ink cartridges. cerned cannot be in the nature of an accessory. Ink cartridges, it contends, do not enable the printer to carry out a particular operation, since the printing process which they facilitate is, by defini- tion, the normal function of a printer. 38. Even without a cartridge, the printer can receive signals issued by a computer, convert them and transmit them to the print head.
35. The Oberfinanzdirektion refute, finally, the reliance placed on the value ratio between the casing and the ink for 39. The sole consequence of the absence of making the classification, that ratio being a cartridge is the impossibility of visualising relevant only if the objective characteristics the results of the printing. But that impossi- of the goods to be classified do not provide, bility does not flow from the absence of a unlike the present case, a solution. cartridge, but from the absence of ink, the proof being that the presence of an empty cartridge in the printer leads to the same result.
36. Those views are broadly shared by the Commission in its observations. In its opinion, classification under heading 8473 as a part or accessory of a printer, is 40. The Commission also notes that clas- excluded. sification of a product as a part of another is unconnected with the fact that the former was designed in response to the technical specification of the latter.
37. As the Court of Justice ruled in the judgment of 19 October 2000 in Peacock, 6 the word 'part' implies a 'whole' 'for the 41. Consequently, it is immaterial that the contested cartridges are equipped with an opening designed to maintain the pressure 6 — Case C-339/98 [2000] ECR I-8947. balance, specially designed for the Epson
I - 1400
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
Stylus Colour printer, as is their complex that, if the metal screen in the contested technical design, owing to their capillary cartridge, the purpose of which is not system and cover shape. stated in the order for reference, is a mechanical or electronic element indispens- able to the printing process, the classifi- cation under heading 8473, as a part for a printer, should be envisaged. 42. Classification as an accessory under heading 8473 is similarly excluded, accord- ing to the Commission, in view of the explanatory note to the harmonised system concerning that heading, since ink car- tridges are not designed to enable the 46. The Commission's observations appear printer to perform a particular operation to be particularly relevant, both in relation and do not allow it to increase its range of to the impossibility of classifying as a part operations. or accessory of a printer the contested cartridges and in relation to the grounds for their classification under heading 3215.
43. According to the Commission, heading 3215 prevails, in the light of general rule 5(b) of interpretation of the CN, where, presented separately from the printer, the 47. First of all, it should be noted that the ink cartridge has no functions other than to Commission and the Oberfinanzdirektion hold stock and store the liquid which it are plainly right in refusing to classify the contains. contested cartridges as accessories to a printer. It is clear that where an ink cartridge is inserted into a printer, the printer is not being adapted for a particular operation, to increase its range of oper- ations or to enable it to perform a par- 44. In the Commission's view there are no ticular service relative to the main function grounds for treating printer cartridges dif- of the machine, as set out in the explana- ferently from fountain pen cartridges which tory notes to the harmonised system con- also in each case are designed for use with a cerning heading 8473. It is only being particular pen, sold under a specific brand, allowed to perform the function for which and which undoubtedly come under head- it is specifically designed, that is to print on ing 3215 in accordance with the explana- paper the data sent in the form of signals by tory note to the harmonised system con- a computer. cerning that heading.
45. The Commission does, however, make 48. The Commission's observations on one qualification, inasmuch as it observes classification as a printer part are more
I - 1401
OPINION OF MR MECHO — CASE C-276/00
paradoxical, but none the less precise. It is could have made a different technical at first sight surprising to read that a printer choice from that which they decided on. I operates perfectly well without an ink guess it ought to be possible to manufacture cartridge, the only problem with that mode printers supplied with an ink reservoir, of operating being that the results of the which the user would have to replenish at machine's operations cannot be seen, in regular intervals. In that case, the reservoir other words, that the printer produces a would undoubtedly be delivered with the blank sheet. printer and would clearly form a part of it and the ink would be supplied in packag- ing, the format of which would be imma- terial, provided that filling the tank was easy. That is not the case for Epson Stylus Colour printers which must be supplied with ink in cartridges which are sold 49. One can imagine the reaction of the separately and which, once empty, have proud proprietor of such a machine when a to be replaced. technician called upon to remedy the failure to print assures him that, notwith- standing that nothing has been printed, the machine is operating perfectly.
50. But the Commission is none the less right, since, as it points out, the reason why the machine fails to print is not that there is no cartridge in the position envisaged by the manufacturer but that the cartridge contains no ink. It must be noted that the 52. Admittedly, the Finanzgericht points essential character, for the purposes of out, the cartridges may be refilled. It does general rule 3(b), of the contested car- not appear however that that is a con- tridges is the ink that they contain. The clusive factor. Refilling is a complex oper- plastic casing is no more than the best ation, which does not consist simply of method which could be devised to supply decanting the ink from a bottle into the the printer with a liquid product indispens- casing, as one would decant wine from a able to its operation and which cannot but bottle into a carafe, and I very much doubt be packaged. that the users of the printers in question are encouraged by the manufacturer to refill automatically, which can cause consider- able difficulty if not done correctly. That is why when a cartridge is refilled this is usually done by a professional, who might just as easily be said to be facilitating the 51. I note also that the designer and the reuse or recycling of empty packaging as to manufacturer of the printer in question be refilling. In other words, it is not because
I - 1402
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
it is possible to refill that ink cartridges may proportioned in such a way that the flow of not be classified as consumable products the drink enables a glass to be filled with which the printer must, as also in the without overflowing. It is also true of jars case of paper, be supplied to carry out the of spices, which are designed differently tasks which may be expected of it. according to whether they are intended to hold thyme or cayenne pepper, since a cook seasoning a dish does not intend the cayenne pepper to come out of the jar in the same quantity as the thyme. It is also true, and this is the last example, of boxes of artificial sweeteners designed to release, 53. It is also clear from Turbon's observa- by simply pressing a button, one unit at a tions that Epson Stylus Colour printers time. Therefore there are no grounds for only have one position for ink cartridges considering that the contested cartridges or, and, consequently, if users wish to change more specifically, the casing containing the from one print colour to another, they must printing ink, may not, in any case, be change the cartridge for the essential classified as packaging on the basis of the element to reach the print head to obtain way in which they are constructed. the desired result, namely ink of the chosen colour. One cannot make it clearer than that the cartridge provides the essential element and therefore it is characterised by the ink which it holds, and not the plastic casing in which it is stored.
54. It was explained that the cartridge is more complicated than one might think, since it is shaped to maintain precisely the 56. Nor is it clear that the casing consti- flow of ink corresponding to the needs of tutes packaging within the meaning of the printer. Whilst I do not doubt this, it general rule 5(b). As noted by the Finanz- appears that there are plenty of forms of gericht, they are not the kind normally used container designed specifically to produce a to hold printing ink, if only because they certain quantity where they supply the actually hold little ink. It might still be product they contain. objected that, in relation to the retail sale of printing ink to users of printers, the pack- aging of ink in cartridge form, able to be fitted directly in the position provided to that end by the manufacturer of the machine, constitutes a standard mode of marketing, the sale of ink in more capacious containers being of interest only 55. That is, it seems to me, true of simple to users, probably a minority, who know bottles, the neck of which is most certainly how to refill cartridges.
I - 1403
OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-276/00
57. Furthermore, in relation to the value 59. Classifying the contested cartridges ratio between the ink and the casing, I note under that heading is not contradictory that there are certainly many other prod- given the classification, under another ucts which, because they are packaged in a heading, either in the case of toners for format corresponding to the preferences of photocopiers, which include a mechanical consumers, who wish to be able to con- element, or printer cartridges including a sume them immediately, without any hand- print head, an essential element in the ling and without having to transport a operation of a printer, or of ball point pens cumbersome and heavy container, are sold linked to their reservoir, which perform the in small quantities, with the result that the function of writing, since they are designed value of the product contained in the for printing on paper with ink held in the packaging may be lower than the value of reservoir. It is wholly compatible with, the packaging, but still without the customs under the same heading, ink cartridges for classification no longer being that appli- fountain pens which are to those pens what cable to the contents. the contested cartridge is to the printer, since their purpose is both to hold the ink and to release, regularly, a flow of ink necessary for the use of an instrument designed to print on paper and have a format, which varies according to the brand, allowing them to be inside the pen for which they are designed, as the Com- mission rightly observed.
58. I prefer, to justify the classification of the contested cartridges under heading 3215, to rely on general rule 3(b), the meaning of which need not be forced, to conclude that what is essential to the purpose of a cartridge, that is operating as part of the printing process, is the ink 60. I can only endorse the Commission's which it contains. Classification under reservation concerning the consequences heading 3215 does not pose, in my inter- which must derive from the classification pretation, any problem. This is printing of the cartridges, if it were found that the ink, a liquid product held in a container metal screen constituted a mechanical or corresponding to consumer expectations, electronic element indispensable to the which does not include any mechanical or printing process. That finding would electrical element occurring in the printing destroy the reasoning followed above for process the presence of which could cause excluding the classification as a printer part the content to lose its essential character in and entail classification under heading the classification of the goods. 8473, as claimed by Turbon.
I - 1404
TURBON INTERNATIONAL
Conclusion
61. Taking account of my conclusions after consideration of the question from the national court in the light of the arguments put forward, I propose that the Court should reply to the Finanzgericht's question as follows:
Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 866/97, must be interpreted as meaning that an ink cartridge consisting of a plastic casing, cellular material, metal screen, seals, tape seal and labels, ink and packing materials without an integrated print head which may be used solely in an Epson Stylus Colour printer classified under heading 8471 of the combined nomenclature, must, generally, be classified under heading 3215 of the combined nomenclature. It may conceivably be classified differently only if the metal screen contained in the ink cartridge fulfils a specific mechanical or electronic function in the printer: in that case, the ink cartridge should be classified as a part or accessory of a printer under heading 8473 of the combined nomenclature.
I - 1405