← Späť na vyhľadávanie
Súdny dvor Európskej únie·12.9.2002

C-285/01

ECLI:EU:C:2002:487

Súd
Súdny dvor Európskej únie
IČS
62001CC0285

BURBAUD

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL STIX-HACKL delivered on 12 September 2002 1

I — Introductory remarks the public service, the rules contained in the aforementioned directive are also relevant to these proceedings.

1. The present case concerns admission to the profession of hospital administrator in France, and in particular the compatibility of French admission requirements with 3. Article 1 of Directive 89/48/EEC pro- C o u n c i l D i r e c t i v e 8 9 / 4 8 / E E C of vides inter alia that: 'For the purposes of 21 December 1988 on a general system this Directive the following definitions shall for the recognition of higher-education apply: diplomas awarded on completion of pro- fessional education and training of at least three years' duration (hereinafter: the 'Di- rective'). 2

(a) diploma: any diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications or any set of such diplomas, certificates or other evidence:

II — Legal framework

— which has been awarded by a competent authority in a Member State, designated in accordance A — Community law with its own laws, regulations or administrative provisions,

2. In addition to the exception laid down in Article 39(4) EC regarding employment in — which shows that the holder has 1 — Original language: German. successfully completed a post-sec- 2 — OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16. ondary course of at least three

I - 8223

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

years' duration, or of an equivalent awarded on the successful completion duration part-time, at a university of education and training received in or establishment of higher edu- the Community and recognised by a cation or another establishment of competent authority in that Member similar level and, where appropri- State as being of an equivalent level ate, that he has successfully com- and if it confers the same rights in pleted the professional training respect of the taking up and pursuit of required in addition to the post- a regulated profession in that Member secondary course, and State;...

— which shows that the holder has the professional qualifications (c) a regulated profession: the regulated required for the taking up or pur- professional activity or range of activ- suit of a regulated profession in ities which constitute this profession in that Member State, a Member State;

provided that the education and train- ing attested by the diploma, certificate (d) regulated professional activity: a pro- or other evidence of formal qualifi- fessional activity, in so far as the taking cations were received mainly in the up or pursuit of such activity or one of Community, or the holder thereof has its modes of pursuit in a Member State three years' professional experience is subject, directly or indirectly by certified by the Member State which virtue of laws, regulations or adminis- recognised a third-country diploma, trative provisions, to the possession of certificate or other evidence of formal a diploma. The following in particular qualifications. shall constitute a mode of pursuit of a regulated professional activity:

The following shall be treated in the same way as a diploma, within the meaning of the first subparagraph: any — pursuit of an activity under a diploma, certificate or other evidence professional title, in so far as the of formal qualifications or any set of use of such a title is reserved to the such diplomas, certificates or other holders of a diploma governed by evidence awarded by a competent laws, regulations or administrative authority in a Member State if it is provisions;

I - 8224

BURBAUD

— pursuit of a professional activity the taking up or pursuit of the pro- relating to health, in so far as fession in question in its territory, such remuneration and/or reimburse- diploma having been awarded in a ment for such an activity is subject Member State; or...'. by virtue of national social security arrangements to the possession of a diploma....'

6. Under Article 4, the host State may require the applicant to implement certain compensatory measures, such as the provi- 4. Article 2 reads in part as follows: sion of evidence of professional experience, the completion of an adaptation period or the taking of an aptitude test.

'This Directive shall apply to any national of a Member State wishing to pursue a regulated profession in a host Member State in a self-employed capacity or as an B — National legislation employed person'.

7. The central legislation in the main pro- ceedings is Decree N o 88-163 of 19 February 1988 providing special public 5. Article 3 provides inter alia that: service rules on the grades and posts of management staff in hospital establish- ments. 3 That decree implements Law No 86-33, the general statute for public servants, Chapter IV of which governs 'Where, in a host Member State, the taking hospital public service. 4 up or pursuit of a regulated profession is subject to possession of a diploma, the competent authority may not, on the grounds of inadequate qualifications, re- fuse to authorise a national of a Member 8. Article 29 of Law No 86-33 essentially State to take up or pursue that profession provides that a 'fonctionnaire' is to be on the same conditions as apply to its own appointed by means of a competition. nationals: Article 37 states inter alia that public

3 — 'Décret portant statut particulier des grades et emplois des personnels de direction des établissements mentionnés à l'article 2 (1 ° , 2° et 3°) de la loi 86-33 du 9 janvier 1986' (JORF, 20 February 1988, p. 2390). That decree has since been amended (Decree No 2000-232 of 13 March 2000, (a) if the applicant holds the diploma JORF, 14 March 2000, p. 3971). required in another Member State for 4 — JORF, 11 January 1986, p. 535.

I - 8225

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

servants are to be established ('titulari- I I I— Facts and main proceedings sation') after successful completion of a 'stage'.

12. It is clear from the documents before the Court that Ms Burbaud, a former Portuguese national who was later granted 9. It follows from Article 5 of Decree French nationality, obtained a degree in No 88-163 that, in principle, recruitment law from the University of Lisbon in 1981. to the hospital managers' corps of the Her assertion that in 1983 she obtained the French public service is by way of a hospital administrator's diploma from the 'concours', that is to say a selection pro- National School of Public Health, Lisbon, cedure in the form of a competition. That and worked as a hospital administrator in competition is the requirement for admis- the Portuguese public service from sion to a course of training organised by the 1 September 1983 to 20 November 1989 National School of Public Health, Rennes has not been disputed. She was then (École Nationale de la Santé Publique de granted leave for the purposes of further Rennes, hereinafter: the 'ENSP'). The train- training in order to pursue doctoral studies ing course consists of theoretical and prac- in France. On 2 July 1993 Ms Burbaud tical elements and lasts 24 to 27 months. applied to the French Minister responsible Individual subjects are graded for assess- for Health for admission to the hospital ment purposes, with an assessment com- managers' corps of the French public ser- mittee grading the candidates ('classement') vice. By letter of 20 August 1993 the at the end of the training. Candidates who Minister rejected her application, essen- have successfully completed the training tially on the ground that admission to the course are established in the public service. French public service was subject to the candidate passing a competition.

10. Decree No 93-703 of 27 March 1993 relating to the ENSP 5stipulates inter alia that the ENSP is to award diplomas. 13. Ms Burbaud then lodged an application with the Tribunal Administratif de Lille (Administrative Court, Lille) for the annul- ment of the decision of the Minister responsible for Health. On 8 July 1997 11. Decree No 2000-232 of 13 March the Tribunal Administratif de Lille dis- 2000 6 stipulates that candidates who have missed that application. On 2 October successfully completed training of an equiv- 1997 Ms Burbaud brought an action alent level within the EEA may be against that judgment before the Cour exempted from all or part of the training Administrative d'Appel de Nancy (Admin- course. istrative Court of Appeal, Nancy), which referred the case to the Cour Adminis- trative d'Appel de Douai (Administrative 5 — JORF, 28 March 1993. Court of Appeal, Douai) on 30 August 6 — JORF, 14 March 2000. 1999.

I - 8226

BURBAUD

14. Ms Burbaud submits that, pursuant to authority make admission to the public the Directive, the diploma from the service of public servants from another National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Member State who rely on an equival- should have been recognised by France as a ent diploma subject to conditions, and diploma to be treated in the same way as in particular subject to passing the completion of the course at the ENSP and School's entrance examination, even that the Portuguese diploma which she for those who have sat a similar holds should therefore have entitled her to competition in their country of origin? admission to the management staff corps without sitting the entrance examination for the ENSP.

V — The first question IV — Questions referred for a preliminary ruling

15. The Cour Administrative d'Appel de A — Submissions of the parties Douai has stayed proceedings and has referred the following questions to the Court: 16. Ms Burbaud pointed out at the hearing that the French system infringes Article 39 EC and the general requirement of equal 1. Is a training course in a practical treatment in that it gives rise to — not training school for public servants, only indirect — discrimination. In that such as the ENSP (École Nationale de regard, she focused on the rules contained la Santé Publique; National School of in Article 5 of Decree No 88-163 under Public Health), leading to establish- which successful completion of the course ment in the public service, to be treated at the ENSP was a requirement for admis- in the same way as a diploma within sion to the profession and the selection the meaning of Council Directive system did not permit knowledge acquired 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 and, in another Member State to be taken into if so, how was the equivalence of the consideration, which deterred precisely diplomas from the National School of those candidates who were more highly Public Health, Lisbon, and the qualified. She added that France does not National School of Public Health, provide any justification for that system. Rennes, to be assessed?

2. If the answer to the first question is in 17. Moreover, Ms Burbaud expressed the the affirmative, may the competent view that the training at issue was covered

I - 8227

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

by the Directive because it concerned a 20. Thus, the French Government takes the regulated profession and a diploma within view that, without prejudice to its classifi- the meaning of Article 1 of the Directive. cation as a diploma within the meaning of Furthermore, she maintained that the Decree No 93-703, the certificate which is requirements laid down in Article 3 of the awarded for such a 'stage' at the ENSP Directive were met. Finally, Ms Burbaud cannot be regarded as a diploma within the pointed out the parallels between the meaning of Article 1 of the Directive. The training she completed at the School for sole purpose of awarding that certificate Public Health in Lisbon and that at the was establishment in the hospital manage- ENSP. ment corps of the public service. The certificate was not awarded for completion of academic training because students at the ENSP were already members of the public service.

18. The French Government disputes that the training at the ENSP which, upon successful completion, leads to establish- ment in the public service in hospital administration, falls within the scope of 21. It also submits that the statute for the Directive. Moreover, it maintains that public servants and in particular the over- the employment which is the subject-matter riding interest of the public service would of these proceedings is part of the national not permit employment under that statute public service, even if, on the basis of the to be regarded as a regulated profession Court's case-law, the exception contained within the meaning of the Directive. The in Article 48(4) of the EC Treaty (now Directive was created for professions which Article 39(4) EC) is not applicable to the may be pursued independently of a par- main proceedings. Owing to the peculiar- ticular field of activity and therefore not for ities of the French public service, the those in the field of activity of the public Directive did not apply to such employ- service. ment or to the statute which governs employees in the public service.

22. Finally, the French Government sub- 19. It points out that a student at the ENSP mits that a decree from the year 2000 serves a probationary period in the public provides for the possibility of exempting service as a paid 'agent stagiaire' immedi- from the training at the ENSP, in full or in ately after passing the entrance examin- part, those candidates who have been ation and that successful completion of the admitted to the 'concours' and have training at the ENSP coincides with estab- received equivalent training in a Member lishment in the public service, which is, in State other than France or in one of the fact, the main objective of the training. States parties to the EEA. However, that

I - 8228

BURBAUD

decree was not designed to implement the 25. The Commission takes the view that Directive but to make it easier for the the hospital administrator's diploma at French authorities to admit EU nationals to issue is a diploma within the meaning of the management corps of the hospital Article 1 of the Directive. It was awarded public service by way of a 'concours'. by the competent authority of a Member State for completion of a three-year train- ing course after which the holder was qualified to pursue the profession of hos- pital administrator in the public service.

23. The Italian Government points out that the French system for recruitment to the hospital public service serves a dual func- tion: training in hospital management and selection of a limited number of the stu- dents. Clearly, those two functions had to be considered separately, the first falling within the scope of the Directive. Thus, as far as professional training was concerned, the ENSP diploma was to be treated in the same way as a diploma awarded in another 26. The diploma attested to the fact that a Member State. The equivalence had to be training course had been undertaken con- examined in the light of the requirements of sisting of practical and theoretical training the Directive. lasting 24 to 27 months and that it had been necessary to pass a competition in order to be awarded a place on that course.

24. The Swedish Government assumes that the profession of hospital administrator is to be classified as a regulated professional activity within the meaning of Article 1(d) of the Directive because admission to that profession presupposes successful comple- tion of an examination for entry to the ENSP, training, and success in the final examination there. It considers that, pro- 27. Pursuant to Article 3 of the Directive, vided that the other criteria laid down by the French authorities in the main proceed- the Directive are also met, the diploma is ings w e r e o b l i g e d to r e c o g n i s e thus a diploma within the meaning of the Ms Burbaud's diploma because it permitted Directive. It made no difference that a post admission to the same profession in the in the public service was connected with it. Member State where it was obtained. If Whether the diploma awarded to there were differences between the two Ms Burbaud was equivalent to that types of training, France could require that awarded by the ENSP was for the national compensatory measures be implemented as court to examine. provided for in Article 4(1) of the Directive.

I - 8229

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

B — Assessment (a) Application of the Directive to profes- sions in the public service

1. Classification of training courses at schools such as the ENSP 30. First of all, an examination should be made of the French Government's sub- missions, according to which the Directive does not apply to professions in the public sector. 28. To answer the first question referred, it must first of all be determined whether employment in the public health sector, that is to say, in the public service, is covered by the Directive at all. Then, it must be examined whether the hospital administrator's diploma can be classified as 31. In that regard, reference is made to a a diploma within the meaning of the judgment of the Court 7 in which the Directive, and in particular whether the Directive was applied to a profession in profession of hospital administrator in the public service. France constitutes a regulated profession within the meaning of the Directive.

32. Moreover, the provisions relating to the scope of the Directive should be taken 29. This preliminary ruling procedure as the starting point. Article 2(1) plainly shows that the Directive has legal and states that the Directive 'shall apply to any practical significance not only for EU national of a Member State wishing to nationals outside a host State but also for pursue a regulated profession... in a self- the nationals of a host State, in this case employed capacity or as an employed French nationals. That is because, although person'. It follows from that article that, the latter themselves fulfil the nationality in principle, the Directive covers all self- requirement necessary in many professions employed and employed persons in regu- in the public service, they may be faced lated professions. If the Directive did not with another obstacle to admission to the also apply to professions in the public profession, that is to say the requirement service, the Community legislature would that they obtain a diploma in the host State. have provided for an exception to that The Directive provides for recognition of effect. Thus, Article 2 of the Directive diplomas obtained in another Member provides for an exception for professions State, inter alia, whether by persons who which are the subject-matter of a separate had always been nationals of the host State Directive. or who, like Ms Burbaud, became nationals of that State only after they had obtained a diploma in another Member State. 7 — Case C-234/97 Fernández de Bobadilla [1999] ECR I-4773.

I - 8230

BURBAUD

33. However, the Directive does not pro- 36. Rather, to determine the extent of such vide for an express exception for profes- an exception under primary legislation, sions in the public service. Nevertheless, the reference should be made to the (narrow) 12th recital contains the following refer- interpretation of Article 48(4) of the EC ence to the exceptions laid down in primary Treaty (now Article 39(4) EC), the provi- legislation for employment in the public sion at issue in this case. service and for activities involving the exercise of public authority in a Member State:

'Whereas the general system for the recog- nition of higher-education diplomas is entirely without prejudice to the appli- 37. The French Government has not cation of Article 48(4) and Article 55 of advanced any arguments to demonstrate the Treaty;'. that the conditions for application of that exception are met in this case. It has merely stated that although certain appointments in the public service do not fall within the scope of the exception laid down in Article 39(4) EC, they are none the less part of the French public service. However, 34. However, that reference merely has a in the present proceedings it is precisely the declaratory significance because the excep- extent of the exception under Community tions provided for in Article 48(4) of the law which is the decisive factor. That is EC Treaty (now Article 39(4) EC) and because the relevant framework when Article 55 of the EC Treaty (now Article 45 making a legal assessment in the light of EC) cannot be revoked by the Directive, Community law is, of course, Community that is to say by secondary legislation. 8 law, not national law.

35. Thus, exceptions laid down in primary legislation also have the effect of exceptions from the Directive. However, that does not automatically mean that, as a result, the whole of the public sector falls outside the scope of the Directive. 38. Consequently, there may be professions or at least activities which, although part of the public service of the Member State 8 — Cf. Pertek, 'Une dynamique de la reconnaissance des diplômes à des fins professionnelles et à des fins académ- concerned, do not fall within the scope of iques: réalisations et nouvelles réflexions, 119' (p. 191 et seq.), in Pertek, La reconnaissance des qualifications dans the exception enshrined in primary legis- un espace européen des formations et des professions, 1998. lation and of significance to the Directive.

I - 8231

O P I N I O N O F MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

39. As far as professions in the health 42. It can therefore be concluded that, in sector are concerned, it can of course be principle, the Directive is also applicable to said that in principle they do not satisfy the employment in the public service. 11 condition developed in case-law and there- fore they do not fall within the scope of the exception provided for by Article 48(4) of the EC Treaty (now Article 39(4) EC). That is because that condition presupposes posts 'which actually involve direct or indirect participation in the exercise of powers (b) Is a hospital administrator's diploma a conferred by public law and duties designed diploma within the meaning of the Direc- to safeguard the general interest of the State tive? or of other public authorities'. 9

43. In order for the hospital adminis- trator's diploma to be regarded as a 40. Finally, an examination must also be diploma within the meaning of Article 1(a) made of the arguments advanced by the of the Directive, it must meet the require- French Government concerning the pecu- ments laid down in that provision, in liarities of the 'écoles d'administration' in particular that it has been awarded by a France, one of which is the ENSP. competent authority in a Member State, designated in accordance with its own laws, regulations or administrative provi- sions and that it qualifies the holder to take up a regulated profession.

41. The Court has held that for the excep- tion provided for by Article 48(4) of the EC Treaty (now Article 39(4) EC) to apply, it makes no difference whether a person is a public servant ('Beamter') or a salaried 44. There is no doubt that the ENSP employee ('Angestellter'). 10 Thus, the fact diploma meets the requirement of being that participants on the ENSP training awarded by a competent authority in a course are subject to special regulations, Member State, designated in accordance that is to say they are regarded as 'agents with its own laws, regulations or adminis- stagiaires', and that they are appointed trative provisions. With regard to the other public servants upon successful completion requirements, the only serious question is of the training, is also irrelevant. whether the profession at issue, for the

11 — Pertek, 'La reconnaissance mutuelle des diplômes d'enseig- 9 — In particular, see, for example, Case C-473/93 Commission nement supérieur', Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, v Luxembourg [1996] ECR I-3207, paragraph 48, a n d 1989, 623 (p. 633 et seq.); Scordamaglia, 'La direttiva Cee Case 307/84 Commission v France [1986] ECR 1725, which sul riconoscimento dei diplomi', in Tizzano (ed.), Problem- concern nurses. atica del diritto delle Comunità europee, 1992, 266 10 — Case 307/84 (cited in footnote 9, paragraph 11) a n d (p. 284); Schneider, Die Anerkennung von Diplomen in Case 152/73 Sotgiu [19741 ECR 153, paragraph 5. der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, 1995, p. 184 et seq.

I - 8232

BURBAUD

taking up of which the ENSP diploma is reserved to those who fulfil certain con- required, is a regulated profession. ditions and access to it is prohibited to those who do not fulfil them'. 12

45. According to the legal definition in 48. Those conditions are fulfilled in the Article 1(c) of the Directive, a regulated present case. That is apparent from the profession is a profession which consists of provisions contained in Law No 86-33, in one or more regulated professional activ- Decree No 88-163 and in the statute ities. governing hospital administrators. It fol- lows from Article 5 of Decree No 88-163 that, in principle, recruitment to posts in the hospital public service is by way of a competition, which is a requirement for access to a course of training organised by the ENSP. Successful graduates are estab- lished in the public service. 46. From Article 1(d) of the Directive, it also follows that a regulated professional activity is a professional activity, in so far as the taking up or pursuit of such activity or one of its modes of pursuit in a Member State is subject, directly or indirectly by 49. It follows from the above that in order virtue of laws, regulations or administrative to pursue the profession of hospital admin- provisions, to the possession of a diploma. istrator, it is necessary to complete the training course successfully. Thus, a 'pro- fessional monopoly' exists.

47. The following interpretation of that provision was given by the Court in 50. The fact that the ENSP diploma is also Aranitis: the document which records appointment as a public servant is as irrelevant as the fact that candidates have already been admitted to the public service during their training course. Those two aspects merely demonstrate the different functions of the diploma and testify to its dual nature as 'Access to, or pursuit of, a profession must evidence of the successful completion of the be regarded as directly governed by legal course and as an instrument of appoint- provisions where the laws, regulations or ment. administrative provisions of the host Member State create a system under which that professional activity is expressly 12 — Case C-164/94 Aranitis [1996] ECR I-135, paragraph 19.

I - 8233

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

51. The function of the document issued by taking up and pursuit of that profession in the ENSP other than purely as a qualifi- Portugal. cation is merely a feature peculiar to the system of recruitment to the French public service. That additional function arises from national legislation and makes no difference whatsoever to the classification of the diploma as a diploma within the meaning of Article 1 of the Directive. It is irrelevant for the purposes of the Directive 54. In particular, the duration and/or con- that national legislation confers on such a tent of the training should also be deter- diploma other functions which extend mined, or it should be examined whether beyond the scope of the Directive. the regulated profession in France includes activities which are not a component of the corresponding regulated profession in Por- tugal; in other words, a comparison should be made of the content of the respective activities, not of the professions themselves, 2. Equivalence of the certificate from the since there would otherwise be a danger of National School of Public Health, Lisbon deciding the case simply on the basis that and the diploma from the ENSP they have the same designation. 13

52. The second part of the first question referred concerns the equivalence of the 55. However, as the Swedish Government certificate from the National School of correctly observes, such an examination is a Public Health, Lisbon, and the diploma matter for the competent national auth- from the ENSP. orities. Whilst it is for the Court of Justice to give the national court guidance as to the interpretation required to decide the case, it is for the national court to assess the facts at issue in the light of the criteria adopted by the Court of Justice. That applies in 53. Proceeding from Article 3 of the Direc- particular in view of the nature of the tive, which is the central provision in that analysis to be carried out. 14 That is regard, it should be examined whether the because the application of Community applicant, Ms Burbaud, possesses a legislation and its implementing provisions diploma which is required in another to a particular case is a matter for the Member State, in this case Portugal, for national court. the taking up and pursuit of the profession of hospital administrator in Portugal. It should therefore be examined whether the 13 — With regard to this danger of nominalism, see Scordam- certificate from the National School of aglia (cited in footnote 11), p. 276. 14 —Case C-446/98 Fazenda Pública [2000] ECR I-11435, Public Health, Lisbon, is required for the paragraph 23.

I - 8234

BURBAUD

VI — The second question the most objective way of implementing the principle of equal access to the public service.

56. The second question referred concerns whether specific conditions for admission to the public service are permissible, in particular a specific form of entrance 59. It therefore followed that a competition examination. Moreover, that question could not in any way be regarded as a relates only to the situation where the diploma within the meaning of Article 1 of persons concerned have already sat a the Directive and thus Member States were competition in their country of origin and not obliged to recognise any equivalence rely on an equivalent diploma. between competitions organised by them and those organised in another Member State.

A — Submissions of the parties 60. Furthermore, Member States remained responsible for establishing the conditions for recruitment and the rules for the functioning of their public service, provided 57. The French Government suggests that that they complied with Articles 12 and the answer to the second question should 39(2) EC. In this regard, the French Gov- be that a Member State (host State) may ernment submits that the organisation of a stipulate t h a t a n a t i o n a l of a n o t h e r single competition for all candidates, Member State who has already sat a regardless of nationality, wishing to be competition in his country of origin must admitted to the public service of a Member pass a further examination in the host State State, is consistent with the principle of to be admitted to the public service. equal treatment. It adds that the Commis- sion expresses the same view in its reasoned opinion of 13 March 2000.

58. The competition which is the subject- matter of these proceedings could not be regarded as a diploma within the meaning 61. The Italian Government takes the view of Article 1 of the Directive because it that the second question concerns neither concerned a particular form of recruitment the freedom of movement for workers and did not confirm that a person who had within the Community nor the recognition passed the competition had successfully of higher-education diplomas under the completed a particular course of study. Directive, but, rather, the equivalence Moreover, admission to the public service between national selection procedures for of the Community was also by way of a the pursuit of management functions in the competition. Finally, the competition was public service.

I - 8235

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

62. However, such subject-matter fell of freedom of movement for workers within the competence of the Member State (which, clearly, is directly applicable) even concerned, which should be free to choose if it was applied without discrimination to the recruitment procedure which best nationals of the host State and nationals of suited its own system and its own require- other Member States. ments. Nevertheless, such freedom was not unlimited since there were restrictions derived from any applicable Community legislation and the prohibition of discrimi- nation against workers.

65. However, the Swedish Government considers that the existing system could be compatible with Community law if it pursued an objective which was in the general interest and it did not go beyond what was necessary to achieve that objec- tive. However, that was a matter for the 63. Proceeding from its observations on the national court. The fact that Ms Burbaud first question, the Swedish Government had already sat a competition in Portugal submits that Ms Burbaud satisfies the was irrelevant in view of the objective of training requirements laid down for hospi- the French competition. tal administrators in France. Thus, she should not be required to sit the entrance examination for the ENSP.

66. The existing system compelled a hospi- tal administrator qualified in another Member State to take an entrance examin- ation for a training course which was designed for the very purpose of training hospital administrators. Therefore, that 64. The French system was such that examination was not designed to test pro- recruitment to the public service was made fessional experience or the knowledge after a basic education at university level required to pursue the profession in France but before professional specialisation. A but was geared to newcomers to the pro- recruitment system which requires profes- fession. sionally qualified workers to sit an admis- sion examination which must also be sat by non-qualified persons was contrary to the rules on the freedom of movement for workers. Such rules prohibited not only discrimination on grounds of nationality but also all obstacles to access to profes- sions in another Member State. The exist- 67. Thus, since the entrance examination ing recruitment system fell within the scope did not recognise professional experience, it

I - 8236

BURBAUD

placed the highest qualified workers at a B — Assessment disadvantage because their qualifications could not be taken into account. Con- sequently, the existing system acted as a deterrent. It was even discriminatory because there was a majority of foreign workers among the group of those placed at a disadvantage, since candidates from France had not yet had the opportunity to 70. The second question concerns the pecu- gather comparable professional experience. liarities of the French system of recruitment to hospital public administration. The present case relates to a system which provides for an assessment both before and after a training course, that is to say a selection competition and an assessment as to whether the course has been completed successfully. 68. The Commission submits that the competition is part of the recruitment system and must be regarded separately from the recognition of diplomas. The recognition of diplomas did not confer any right to employment. Instead, the recruitment systems in existence on the relevant labour market applied. Thus, the French authorities were able to stipulate 71. It must be noted first of all that the that a competition should be sat even by question referred concerns not only the those persons who had already sat a com- entrance examination ('concours d'entrée') parable competition in their country of but also the assessment as to whether the origin. However, this had to ensure access course has been completed successfully, to the profession and not only access to a because admission to the ENSP is presented training course. only as one of the conditions for entry to the public service.

69. At the hearing, the Commission con- centrated on assessing the French system in the light of Article 39 EC and in so doing 72. As regards the French Government's took the view that access to the profession submission that the Member States are free was restricted because the same conditions to determine the rules for recruitment to applied, even to qualified foreigners. The the public service, it must be observed that Commission pointed out that France had there are restrictions under Community law not presented any justification for that also in that regard, as the Italian Govern- restriction. ment rightly points out.

I - 8237

OPINION OF MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

73. It is apparent from its wording and its course are, in fact, already members of the link with the first question that the second public service in their capacity as 'agents question also refers to the Directive. stagiaires' and become established public Neither the second nor the first question servants upon the assessment of their mentions any other provision of Commu- training to that effect at the ENSP. nity law. It is not for the Court of Justice to determine what Community rules are rel- evant, but to interpret the provisions cited by the national court, in this case, the Directive.

76. The generalisation cannot be made, as will be shown below, that the existing rules implement the principle of equality only 74. However, even in the context of the where admission to posts in the public Directive, it remains a fundamental obli- service is concerned, which is the French gation on the part of Member States, both Government's argument. It is just as dif- when transposing and actually applying it, ficult to support the argument that to observe the principles established by the Article 39(2) EC, a requirement under Court in its case-law on the recognition of primary legislation, is satisfied. Even diplomas. 15 reliance on the requirement of equal treat- ment does not appear to be relevant since, under the French system, applicants who have qualified in another Member State are subject to the same rules as unqualified applicants; in particular they must undergo the same training.

75. As the Commission correctly points out, a selection mechanism for admission to the public service is permissible in principle. As already stated when address- ing the first question, the system chosen by France combines training and admission as well as quantitative and qualitative elements in its selection procedure. That applies both to the entrance examination 77. As the Swedish Government and the and to the assessment at the end of the Commission correctly point out, not only course; the participants on the training newcomers to the profession but also qualified applicants are subject to the French system. In particular, that applies 15 — This essentially concerns the principles contained in Case to the requirement to pass an entrance C-340/89 Vlassopoulou [1991] ECR I-2357. Cf. Case C-238/98 Hocsman [2000] ECR I-6623, paragraphs 23 et examination for a place on the training seq. and 31 et seq., and Case C-31/00 Dreessen [2002] ECR I-663, paragraph 24 et seq. course.

I - 8238

BURBAUD

78. In accordance with the requirements of munity law in that it does not permit the Directive, Member States must provide previously obtained qualifications to be for a test of the equivalence of diplomas. If taken into account. However, the obli- such a test shows that a diploma obtained gation to recognise 'end products', 17 that is in another Member State is 'equivalen[t]' to to say to recognise an equivalent diploma that from the ENSP (and the second ques- obtained in another Member State, con- tion is raised only where this is the case), stitutes one of the basic principles of the applicants should not even be required to Directive. attend the training course.

79. To impose such a requirement would otherwise mean that no account was taken of the professional experience or qualifi- cations gained in another Member State, 82. It should be pointed out that the French which would be a classic case of covert Government's argument that there is no discrimination. obligation to recognise competitions is correct in so far as there can be no auto- matic recognition as such. What must be examined, however, is whether and to what extent a foreign entrance competition is equivalent to a competition in the host 80. Since the assessment at the end of the State. training course constitutes more than simply a quantitative selection but also includes an assessment of knowledge and/or practical experience, even the possi- bility of only sitting the final assessment 16 (which is not an option), that is to say of having direct access to this type of examin- ation, could constitute an infringement of the Directive where those already qualified in the profession are concerned. 83. On the one hand, the fact that a Member State organises a competition cannot be an obstacle to applying the recognition obligation provided for in the Directive. 18 On the other hand, however, Community law does not require the com- 81. Therefore, the system applied in the plete abolition of competitions either. The main proceedings is inconsistent with Com- Directive does not govern quantitative but

16 — Cf. Favret, 'Le système général de reconnaissance des diplômes et des formations professionnelles en droit 17 — See Schneider with regard to selection competitions for communautaire: L'esprit et la méthode', Revue trimes- teacher training (cited in footnote 11, page 377). trielle de droit européen, 1995, p. 259 (265). 18 — Case C-419/92 Scholz [1994] ECR I-505.

I - 8239

O P I N I O N O F MRS STIX-HACKL — CASE C-285/01

qualitative admission restrictions, 19 that is is to say tests which do not permit previous to say the recognition of diplomas. qualifications to be taken into account at all.

84. Thus, an obligation (possibly) to adapt recruitment systems can at least be derived from the Directive. This means that, within the context of competition procedures, provision must be made for the possibility 87. The necessary adaptations of national of taking into account qualifications law may in themselves require legal acquired in another Member State. 20 Thus, changes to be made to existing recruitment in certain circumstances, the Directive also systems, for example to the special provi- requires a closed monopoly to be trans- sions for the hospital public service in the formed into an open monopoly. 21 general statute or to the respective decrees concerning 'agents stagiaires' or the 'ENSP'. 23 This could be achieved, for instance, by extending exceptions that already exist to cases concerning the rec- ognition of diplomas. In that connection 85. It is true that, as already stated above, reference need only be made to the existing Article 4 of the Directive permits Member exceptions for cases of ' m u t a t i o n ' States to require compensatory measures to (transfer) 24 or 'tour extérieur' (fast stream be implemented and such measures may career progression). also be incorporated into a (modified) selection procedure. 22

86. Therefore, in principle, provision could also still be made for tests in such a 88. Thus, the answer to the second ques- modified selection procedure. However, tion should be that the competent authority such tests must be differentiated from the may not make admission to the public tests at issue which are the same for service in the host State of public servants qualified and unqualified applicants, that from another Member State who rely on an equivalent diploma subject to conditions, and in particular subject to passing an 19 — As regards this distinction, see my Opinion in Case examination such as that in the main C-232/99 Commission v Spain [2002] ECR I-4235, point 41 et seq. proceedings. 20 — Cf. Pertek (cited in footnote 11 ), p. 634, with regard to the education and training sector. 21 — See Pertek (cited in footnote 8), p. 153 and p. 162, regarding the two forms. 2 3 —Cf. Decree N o 2000-232 of 13 March 2000 (JORF, 22 — See Favret (cited in footnote 16), p. 265, regarding this 14 March 2000, p. 3971). possibility. 24 — Schneider (cited in footnote 11), p. 392.

I - 8240

BURBAUD

VII — Conclusion

89. In the light of the foregoing, I propose that the Court should answer the questions referred as follows:

( 1 ) A training course in a practical training school for public servants, such as the ENSP (École Nationale de la Santé Publique; National School of Public Health), leading to establishment in the public service, leads to a diploma within the meaning of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration.

(2) The competent authority may not make admission to the public service of the host State of public servants from another Member State who rely on an equivalent diploma within the meaning of the Directive subject to conditions, and in particular subject to passing an examination such as that in the main proceedings.

I - 8241

Text rozhodnutia bol prevzatý z verejne dostupných úradných zdrojov. Rozhodnutie je úradným dokumentom.
Navrhy_ga C-285/01 – Súdny dvor Európskej únie | AI Pravnik